ABSTRACT
Carcinoid tumours offer a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Although new biochemical markers and improved methods for tumour detection, including PET and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, have been developed during the last two decades many patients are still diagnosed at late stages of the disease. This is supported by the fact that the age of diagnosis is about the same today as it was 10 years ago. It is our opinion that plasma chromogranin A levels should be be determined in all patients which are investigated because of symptoms that might be connected to a neuroendocrine tumour. In cases with flushing or diarrhoea, U-5-HIAA should also be determined and these two tumour markers are enough to diagnose most patients with midgut carcinoid tumours. In patients with foregut or hindgut tumours other specific hormones should be included. For the localization procedure conventional radiological techniques including CT, MRI and ultrasound investigations should be supplemented with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Endoscopic ultrasound investigations might in the future be relevant for diagnosis of duodenal carcinoids, whereas gastric and rectal carcinoids are diagnosed by endoscopy. A combination of more aggressive surgery combined with medical treatment such as somatostatin analogues and alpha-interferon has significantly increased the survival rates in patients with classical midgut carcinoid tumours. Metastatic foregut and hindgut tumours are still a therapeutic challenge and it is important in the future to classify all carcinoid tumours based on specific tumour biology patterns. Such a tumour biology based treatment is a prerequisite for a more individually based therapy in the future.
Subject(s)
Carcinoid Tumor/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoid Tumor/mortality , Carcinoid Tumor/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Diagnostic Imaging , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/mortality , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Survival RateABSTRACT
24 patients with malignant carcinoid tumours received octreotide and interferon alfa (IFN-alpha). All the patients initially received octreotide 50-100 micrograms, twice daily. When progressive symptoms or increasing biochemical markers were observed, the daily dose was raised to a median 300 micrograms. If the initial dose proved ineffective or if no improvement was seen after escalation, IFN-alpha was added (median 9 MU subcutaneously per week). After the addition of IFN-alpha, 17 of the 22 patients (77%) with elevated urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid showed a significant (> 50%) reduction. Only 1 patient progressed and 4 had continuously stable biochemical disease. No significant reduction in tumour size was noted; in 5 patients, the tumour continued to grow despite decreasing hormone levels. 18 patients had carcinoid syndrome when IFN-alpha was added in 10 (56%) symptoms ameliorated. Thus, the addition of IFN-alpha is beneficial for patients with malignant carcinoid tumours that progress and/or who do not respond to octreotide.
