Improved adherence to practice guidelines yields better outcome in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: findings from nationwide FINACS studies.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment options for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without ST elevation have evolved rapidly during the recent years, but the successful implementation of practice guidelines incorporating new treatments into practice has been challenging. In this study, we evaluate whether targeted educational intervention could improve adherence to treatment guidelines of ACS without ST elevation. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A previous study, FINACS I, evaluated the treatment and outcome of 501 consecutive non-ST elevation ACS patients that were referred in early 2001 to nine hospitals, covering nearly half of the Finnish population. That study revealed poor adherence to ESC guidelines, so targeted educational intervention on optimal practice was arranged before the second study (FINACS II), which was performed in the same hospitals using the same protocol as FINACS I. FINACS II, undertaken in early 2003, evaluated 540 consecutive patients. Interventions. Targeted educational programmes on optimal practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The use of evidence-based therapies in non-ST elevation ACS patients. In-hospital event-free (death, new myocardial infarction, refractory angina, readmission with unstable angina and transient cerebral ischaemia/stroke) survival, and event-free survival at 6 months. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and risk markers were similar in both studies, and no significant changes in resources were seen. In 2003, the in-hospital use of statins, ACE-inhibitors, clopidogrel and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists increased significantly, and in-hospital angiography was performed more often, especially in high-risk patients (59% vs. 45%, P < 0.05); waiting time also shortened (4.2 +/- 5.5 vs. 5.8 +/- 4.7 days, P < 0.01). Overall no significant change was seen in the frequency of death either in-hospital (2% vs. 4%, P = NS) or at 6 months (7% vs. 10%, P = NS) in FINACS II. However, the survival of high-risk patients improved both in-hospital (95% vs. 90%, P = 0.05) and at 6 months (89% vs. 78%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with non-ST elevation ACS-targeted educational interventions appeared to be associated with improved adherence to practical guidelines, which yielded a better outcome in high-risk ACS patients.

Electrocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy with time-voltage QRS and QRST-wave areas.

The sum of time-voltage QRS areas in the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) has outperformed other 12-lead ECG indices for detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We assessed indices of time-voltage QRS and T-wave (QRST) areas from body surface potential mapping (BSPM) for detection of and quantitation of the degree of LVH. We studied 42 patients with echocardiographic LVH (LVH group) and 11 healthy controls (controls). QRST area sums were calculated from 123-lead BSPM and from the 12-lead ECG for comparison. Leadwise discriminant indices and correlation coefficients were used to identify optimal recording locations for QRST area-based LVH assessment. BSPM QRS area sum was greater in the LVH group than in controls (3752 +/- 1259 vs 2278 +/- 627 microV s, respectively; P<0.001) and at 91% specificity showed 74% sensitivity for LVH detection. The 12-lead QRS area sum performed similarly. Taking T-wave areas into account did not improve the results. QRS area sum from two most informative leads (located in the upper and lower right precordium) also separated the LVH group from controls (61.1 +/- 23.5 vs 27.8 +/- 6.5 microV s, respectively; P<0.00001). This 2-lead QRS area sum showed 90% sensitivity with 100% specificity for LVH detection and maintained high correlation to indexed left ventricular mass (r=0.732; P<0.001). In conclusion, the BSPM QRS area sum compared to 12-lead QRS area sum does not substantially improve LVH assessment. The 2-lead QRS area sum may improve ECG QRS area-based LVH assessment.

Decreases by magnesium of QT dispersion and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Magnesium treatment suppresses ventricular arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction and possibly mortality after infarction, but the underlying mechanisms are inadequately understood. We tested whether the effect of magnesium could be attributed to an influence on the autonomic control of the heart, changes in disturbed repolarization, relief of ischaemia or limitation of myocardial injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive 70 mmol of magnesium (n = 31) infused over 24 h or placebo (n = 26). Occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias and heart rate variability (SD of 5-min mean sinus beat intervals over a 24 h period, SDANN; low frequency/high frequency amplitude ratio, LF/HF ratio), and the number of ischaemic episodes on vectorcardiography were measured from the first day of treatment. QT dispersion corrected for heart rate was measured from the 12-lead ECG. Magnesium decreased the number of hourly ventricular premature beats (P < 0.001) and the number of ventricular tachycardias (P < 0.05). QT dispersion corrected for heart rate was decreased in both measurements at 24 h and 1 week (P < 0.001). SDANN and LF/HF ratio were unchanged. The number of ischaemic episodes on vectorcardiography were equal, and peak creatine kinase MB release did not differ between the groups. In testing the pathophysiological mechanisms, serum magnesium levels after infusion correlated with hourly ventricular premature beats (rs = -0.47; P < 0.01), ventricular tachycardias (rs = -0.26; P < 0.05), and QT dispersion corrected for heart rate (rs = -0.75; P < 0.001), but not with SDANN, LF/HF ratio or peak creatine kinase MB. QT dispersion corrected for heart rate correlated with hourly ventricular premature beats (rs = 0.48; P < 0.001) and ventricular tachycardias (rs = 0.27; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium suppresses early ventricular arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction. The decreased arrhythmicity is related to enhancement of homogeneity in repolarization, but not to attenuation of prevailing ischaemia, improvement of autonomic nervous derangements or myocardial salvage.