Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
6.
Personal Disord ; 4(2): 121-128, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23046042

ABSTRACT

The current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnostic system for Axis II disorders continues to be characterized by considerable heterogeneity and poor discriminant validity. Such problems impede accurate personality disorder (PD) diagnosis. As a result, alternative assessment tools are often used in conjunction with the DSM. One popular framework is the object relational model developed by Kernberg and his colleagues (J. F. Clarkin, M. F. Lenzenweger, F. Yeomans, K. N. Levy, & O. F. Kernberg, 2007, An object relations model of borderline pathology, Journal of Personality Disorders, Vol. 21, pp. 474-499; O. F. Kernberg, 1984, Severe Personality Disorders, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; O. F. Kernberg & E. Caligor, 2005, A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders, in M. F. Lenzenweger & J. F. Clarkin, Eds., Major Theories of Personality Disorder, New York, NY: Guilford Press). Drawing on this model and empirical studies thereof, the current study attempted to clarify Kernberg's (1984) PD taxonomy and identify subtypes within a sample with varying levels of personality pathology using finite mixture modeling. Subjects (N = 141) were recruited to represent a wide range of pathology. The finite mixture modeling results indicated that 3 components were harbored within the variables analyzed. Group 1 was characterized by low levels of antisocial, paranoid, and aggressive features, and Group 2 was characterized by elevated paranoid features. Group 3 revealed the highest levels across the 3 variables. The validity of the obtained solution was then evaluated by reference to a variety of external measures that supported the validity of the identified grouping structure. Findings generally appear congruent with previous research, which argued that a PD taxonomy based on paranoid, aggressive, and antisocial features is a viable supplement to current diagnostic systems. Our study suggests that Kernberg's object relational model offers a plausible substantive aid in refining PD classification.


Subject(s)
Personality Assessment , Personality Disorders/diagnosis , Adult , Aggression , Antisocial Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Antisocial Personality Disorder/psychology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Psychological , Paranoid Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Paranoid Personality Disorder/psychology , Personality Disorders/classification , Personality Disorders/psychology , Reproducibility of Results
7.
Clin Neuropsychol ; 21(1): 146-61, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17366282

ABSTRACT

It has been suggested that virtual reality may provide a medium for producing neuropsychological measures with greater ecological validity. The present study examined the usefulness of virtual reality (VR) to assess learning and memory in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A total of 20 TBI participants were compared with 20 healthy controls on their ability to learn and recall 16 target items presented within a VR-based generic office environment. The results indicated that VR memory testing accurately distinguished the TBI group from controls. Additionally, non-memory-impaired TBI participants acquired targets at the same rate as HC participants. Finally, there was a significant relationship between the VR Office and a standard neuropsychological measure of memory, suggesting the construct validity of the task. These findings suggest that the VR Office provides a viable medium for measuring learning and memory. The present results provide preliminary support for the ecological validity of the VR Office, which ultimately can improve assessment of real-world functioning following TBI.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Memory, Short-Term , Neuropsychological Tests , Pattern Recognition, Visual , Social Environment , User-Computer Interface , Adult , Attention , Brain Injuries/psychology , Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Orientation , Reproducibility of Results
8.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 86(8): 1565-74, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16084809

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a neuropsychologic rehabilitation program consisting of psychotherapy and cognitive remediation in the treatment of the affective and neuropsychologic sequelae of mild-spectrum traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Single-blind randomized, wait-listed controlled trial, with repeated measures and multiple baselines. SETTING: Outpatient clinic in northern New Jersey. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty persons with persisting complaints after mild and moderate TBI (11 in treatment group, 9 controls). INTERVENTIONS: The experimental group received both 50 minutes of individual cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy and 50 minutes of individual cognitive remediation, 3 times a week for 11 weeks. The control group was wait-listed and received treatment after conclusion of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom Check List-90R General Symptom Index, plus scales of depression, anxiety, coping, attention, and neuropsychologic functioning. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the treatment group showed significantly improved emotional functioning, including lessened anxiety and depression. Most significant improvements in emotional distress were noted at 1 month and 3 months posttreatment. Performance on a measure of divided auditory attention also improved, but no changes were noted in community integration scores. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive behavioral psychotherapy and cognitive remediation appear to diminish psychologic distress and improve cognitive functioning among community-living persons with mild and moderate TBI.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation , Psychotherapy/methods , Adult , Brain Injuries/complications , Chi-Square Distribution , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Single-Blind Method , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome , Waiting Lists
9.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc ; 10(2): 278-85, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15012848

ABSTRACT

The degree of neuropsychological dysfunction across multiple domains was examined in individuals suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). In this descriptive study, a similar series of neuropsychological tests was administered to a group of CFS patients and healthy participants. More specifically, CFS patients (n = 141) who met the 1994 Case Definition criteria were compared to 76 healthy control participants on tests of memory, attention (concentration), speed of information processing, motor speed, and executive functioning. On the 18 measures administered, CFS patients scored 1 standard deviation below the healthy mean on nine measures and scored 2 standard deviations below the healthy mean on four of the measures. Moreover, results indicated that CFS patients were more likely than healthy controls to fail (1.6 SD below the healthy mean) at least one test in each of the following domains: attention, speed of information processing, and motor speed, but not on measures of memory and executive functioning. Finally, CFS patients demonstrated a greater total number of tests failed across domains.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/complications , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Severity of Illness Index
10.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 191(5): 324-31, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12819552

ABSTRACT

Individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) face chronic physical debilitation, reduced neuropsychological functioning, and changes in emotional well-being that significantly detract from quality of life. The role of psychiatric disturbance in reducing quality of life in CFS remains unclear. In the current investigation, the role of psychiatric status in reducing health-related quality of life in CFS was examined. Four subject groups were compared on measures of functional well-being, mood, and neuropsychological status: individuals with CFS and no history of psychiatric illness, individuals who had current symptoms of psychiatric illness that began after their CFS diagnosis, individuals who had current symptoms of psychiatric illness that began before their CFS diagnosis, and a healthy sedentary control group. Overall, it was found that individuals with CFS suffer from profound physical impairment. Concurrent psychiatric illness, however, did not adversely affect physical functional capacity. Physical functional capacity was not worse in individuals with a concurrent psychiatric illness. As expected, concurrent psychiatric illness was found to reduce emotional well-being. Moreover, individuals with a psychiatric illness that predated the onset of CFS suffered the greatest emotional distress. Thus, an individual's psychiatric history should be considered when attempting to understand the factors maintaining disability in CFS.


Subject(s)
Affect , Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Neuropsychological Tests , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/epidemiology , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Social Adjustment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...