A Systemic Hyperthermia Oncologic Working Group trial. Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Based on earlier clinical and preclinical studies, we conducted a phase II trial in metastatic sarcoma patients of the combination of 41.8 degrees C (x60 min) radiant heat (Aquatherm) whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) with 'ICE' chemotherapy. The ICE regimen consists of ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)), concurrent with WBH, with etoposide also on days 2 and 3 post-WBH. METHODS: Therapy was delivered every 4 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles. All patients received filgrastim or lenograstim. RESULTS: Of 108 patients enrolled as of September 2001, 95 are evaluable for response. Of the evaluable patients (mean ECOG performance status approximately 1; mean age 42.3; 58% male) 33 had no prior therapy for metastatic disease, and 62 were pretreated (mean: 1.5 prior regimens). The overall response rate was 28.4% (4 complete remissions and 23 partial remissions) with stable disease (SD) in 31 patients. For no prior therapy, the response rate was 36%; in pretreated patients it was 24%. The median overall survival by Kaplan-Meier estimates was 393 days (95% CI 327, 496); the median time to treatment failure was 123 days (95% CI 77, 164). The major toxicity (287 cycles) was grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia seen in 79.7 and 60.6% of treatments respectively; there were 7 episodes of infection (grade 3/4) with 2 treatment-related deaths, bot involving disease progression and ureteral obstruction. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with continued clinical investigation of this combined modality approach.

A pilot study of whole body hyperthermia and carboplatin in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of whole body hyperthermia (WBH) to carboplatin (CBDCA) can induce responses in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. 16 pretreated patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were entered on a Systemic Hyperthermia Oncological Working Group (SHOWG) study; (14 patients were eligible with 14 evaluable for toxicity and 12 for response). The patients were treated with WBH (Aquatherm) 41.8 degrees C x 60 min in combination with carboplatin (CBDCA) (area under the curve (AUC) of 8) every 4 weeks. Disease status was evaluated every two cycles. Patients were treated for a maximum of six cycles. One patient had a complete response (CR) and 4 had a partial response (PR). 4 patients had stable disease (SD). 3 patients had progressive disease (PD). 2 patients were unevaluable: 1 had a bowel obstruction shortly after her first treatment; the second patient achieved a CR, but only had one treatment secondary to an idiosyncratic reaction to sedative drugs. 2 patients entered on study were ineligible, as they did not meet criteria for platinum resistance; 1 entered a CR and 1 had SD. Dose-limiting toxicity, which required CBDCA dose reductions, was grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included neutropenia (grade 3/4), and nausea and/or vomiting. Consistent with preclinical modelling, these results suggests that 41.8 degrees C WBH can overcome platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. These observations suggest further investigation of the therapeutic potential of WBH in a group of patients who historically fail to respond to salvage therapies is warranted.

Whole body hyperthermia induction of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors: implications for rheumatoid diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that 41.8 degrees C x 60 min whole body hyperthermia (WBH) induces increased serum levels of soluble necrosis factor receptors (sTNF-R). METHODS: We tested the serum of cancer patients for changes in sTNF-RI and RII levels, as a function of time, pre and post: (1) WBH alone, (2) WBH and chemotherapy, i.e., melphalan (L-PAM), and (3) L-PAM alone. RESULTS: For sTNF-RI there was a marked increase (over pre-treatment values, i.e., 86%) in serum levels after WBH alone (n = 3), which peaked 2.5 h post-WBH; L-PAM (iv) only resulted in a dip in sTNF-RI seen 40 min postadministration; the combination (WBH + L-PAM), resulted in both the dip at 40 min and the increase at 2.5 h post-treatment. For sTNF-RII both WBH alone (n = 3) and WBH + L-PAM (n = 2), there was an increase in receptor serum levels of 25% and 30%, respectively, which peaked 5.5 h post-treatment, and remained elevated at 24 h. L-PAM alone resulted in a dip in levels only at 40 min post-treatment. sTNF-RI and RII levels returned to baseline values within 7 days post-treatment. CONCLUSION: 41.8 degrees C WBH results in transient increases in TNF-RI and RII. These results may have therapeutic implications for the application of WBH to TNF mediated disease processes.

Phase I trial of intravenous thymidine and carboplatin in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biologic interactions and toxicities of carboplatin combined with a 24-hour infusion of thymidine 75 mg/m(2) in a phase I trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with cancer refractory to conventional therapy were treated. The first set of patients (n = 7) received thymidine alone 4 weeks before subsequent planned courses of thymidine combined with carboplatin followed (4 weeks) by carboplatin alone. Carboplatin was administered over 20 minutes at hour 20 of the 24-hour thymidine infusion. The carboplatin dose was escalated in patient groups: 200 mg/m(2) (n = 3); 300 mg/m(2) (n = 7); 350 mg/m(2) (n = 4); 400 mg/m(2) (n = 3); 480 mg/m(2) (n = 10); and 576 mg/m(2) (n = 5). At the maximum-tolerated dose (480 mg/m(2)), five patients received combined therapy first and carboplatin alone second, and five patients received carboplatin first and combined therapy second. Maintenance therapy for stable or responding patients was combined therapy. RESULTS: Evaluation demonstrated a trend toward thymidine protection of carboplatin-induced treatment-limiting thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia with carboplatin alone or in combination was negligible. Thymidine alone had no myelosuppressive effects and produced reversible grade 1 or 2 nausea and vomiting (57%), headache (25%), and grade 1 neurotoxicity (22%). Thymidine did not enhance expected carboplatin toxicities. There was no therapy-related infection or bleeding. Analysis of platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate and urine showed no effect by thymidine. Similarly, thymidine pharmacokinetics was not affected by carboplatin. As predicted, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide levels in peripheral lymphocytes were increased during exposure to carboplatin and/or thymidine but were decreased by carboplatin alone. In three patients with high-grade glioma, responses included one complete remission (21 months) and one partial remission (14 months) at the 480-mg/m(2)-dose level, and disease stabilization (7 months) at the 400-mg/m(2-dose) level. A minor response was observed in a patient with metastatic colon cancer (5 months) at the 480-mg/m(2)-dose level. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and thymidine as described is well tolerated. The data presented have resulted in a phase II study by the North American Brain Tumor Consortium.

A pilot study of melphalan, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibilitv of sequencing (based on preclinical modeling) tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF) at two dose levels with melphalan (L-PAM) and 41.8 C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) for 60 min. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients with refractory cancer were treated from October 1995 to June 1997. The study encompassed a total of 20 trimodality treatment courses. Three patients were treated at TNF dose level I (50 microg/m2) and six patients were treated at TNF dose level II (100 microg/m2). TNF was delivered as a 24-h intravenous infusion, 48 h prior to the combination of L-PAM and WBH; L-PAM was given over 10 min at target temperature at a dose of 17.5 mg/ m2 based on a previous phase I WBH/L-PAM trial. WBH was administered with an Aquatherm radiant heat device. RESULTS: Myelosuppression was the major toxicity associated with therapy, but there were no instances of bleeding or neutropenic fevers. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen with 15% of treatments. Regarding absolute neutrophil count, 15% of treatments were associated with grade 3 toxicity, and 45% with grade 4 toxicity, and regarding white blood cell count, 50% of treatments were associated with grade 3 toxicity and 10% with grade 4 toxicity. The myelosuppression observed was equivalent to that seen in our earlier phase I study of WBH and L-PAM (without TNF). Only mild toxicities (grade 1 or 2) were associated with TNF; these were seen with <25% of treatments and included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fevers, and headache. There were no instances of hypotension. There was no relationship between toxicities observed and the two TNF dose levels. Mild WBH toxicities were seen with less than 15% of treatments; these included nausea, vomiting, and herpes simplex I. Responses included two complete remissions (malignant melanoma, TNF dose level I; breast cancer, TNF dose level II), and two disease stabilizations (both malignant melanoma, TNF dose level I). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the combination of TNF, L-PAM, and WBH is well tolerated at the dose levels studied. The clinical results justify further clinical investigation for this trimodality treatment approach.

Phase I clinical trial of melphalan and 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biologic interactions and toxicities of melphalan (L-PAM) combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) for 60 minutes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with refractory cancer were treated (May 1992 to May 1995) with WBH alone during week 1) thereafter patients were randomized to receive either L-PAM alone on week 2 and L-PAM plus WBH on week 5, or the reverse sequence. Patients who demonstrated clinical improvement received WBH plus L-PAM monthly. Dose levels of L-PAM were 10 mg/m2 (n = 3), 15 mg/m2 (n = 3), 17.5 mg/m2 (n = 6), and 20 mg/m2 (n = 4). L-PAM was administered at target temperature; WBH was administered with an Aquatherm radiant-heat device (patent pending; Cancer Research Institute, New York, NY). RESULTS: Comparisons of mean WBC count and platelet nadirs for L-PAM alone and L-PAM plus WBH demonstrated that the addition of WBH resulted in nadir counts that were, on average, 25% lower. There were no instances of febrile neutropenia or bleeding. Toxicities allowed for escalation of L-PAM to 20 mg/m2; all four patients at this level experienced grade 4 myelosuppression. No significant myelosuppression was observed at 10 and 15 mg/m2. Grade 3 myelosuppression was observed in two of six patients at 17.5 mg/m2. Responses included complete remission (CR) of pancreatic cancer (10 mg/m2), partial remission (PR) of malignant melanoma in two patients (20 mg/m2), and transient clinical and/or serologic improvement in five patients. The pharmacokinetics of L-PAM were not altered by WBH. Observed cytokine induction by WBH is also discussed in detail. CONCLUSION: We conclude that L-PAM with 41.8 degrees C WBH is well tolerated. Clinical results are consistent with preclinical predictions and provide a foundation for second-generation trials now in progress.

Hematological effects of radiant heat-induced whole body hyperthermia on dogs.

The effects on hematological parameters of radiant heat-induced whole body hyperthermia (WBH) at 40.5 degrees C and 41.8 degrees C were determined in 6 normal dogs. Complete blood counts determined prior to WBH, immediately post WBH plateau, and at 1, 2, 7, and 14 days posttreatment did not change significantly following WBH at 40.5 degrees C or 41.8 degrees C. Similarly, no significant changes were detected in platelet counts measured following 40.5 degrees C WBH. In contrast, platelet counts 11 days following 41.8 degrees C WBH increased significantly (P < 0.05) consistent with the hypothesis of induction of putative WBH-induced platelet stimulating factors.

Cytokine induction by 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia.

The potential for 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia (WBH) to enhance ionizing irradiation and cytotoxic chemotherapy without a commensurate increase in normal tissue toxicity is currently receiving renewed clinical interest. Additionally, WBH may have other biological sequela which may be clinically exploited. In this paper, data are summarized revealing the ability of WBH to induce elevated plasma levels of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) within hours of WBH. Data regarding TNF-alpha shows induction in only a proportion of patients. No induction of C-reactive protein (CRP) or the following cytokines was observed: granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-7 (IL-7), interleukin-11 (IL-11), interleukin-12 (IL-12), macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1 alpha). Data regarding interleukin-3 (IL-3) and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) were variable and inconclusive. The implications of these results to past and future clinical trials are discussed.

Cytotoxic interactions of tumor necrosis factor, melphalan and 41.8 degrees C hyperthermia.

Experience with limb perfusion-hyperthermia, TNF, and L-PAM suggests dramatic clinical responses in sarcoma and malignant melanoma. To extrapolate these results to clinical 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) and systemic therapy, we studied the cytotoxic interactions of TNF, L-PAM and hyperthermia in L929 cells. The optimal sequence was TNF preceding 41.8 degrees C hyperthermia by 48 h, and L-PAM given simultaneously with heat. Trimodality synergism between TNF, hyperthermia and L-PAM was demonstrated. Non-cytotoxic doses of TNF had a super-additive interaction with L-PAM/heat. Conversely, non-cytotoxic doses of L-PAM had super-additive interactions with TNF followed by hyperthermia. Relative to therapeutic index, we studied WBH, L-PAM and TNF in non-tumor bearing mice. The optimal trimodality sequence did not result in increased normal tissue toxicity compared to L-PAM alone. The concentrations and sequencing of TNF and L-PAM studied are consistent with clinical application to WBH.