Safety of perioperative treatment with biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing bowel surgery: Experience from a large urban center.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Risks of peri- and postoperative complications after bowel surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving biologics are still discussed controversially. We therefore addressed the safety of different biologics that were applied in our IBD center before surgery. METHODS: Data of IBD patients who underwent bowel resections between 2012 and 2022 at our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Exposure to biologics was defined by receiving biologics within 12 weeks before resective abdominal surgery. Safety considerations included minor complications, such as infections and wound healing disorders and major complications, e.g., anastomotic insufficiency or abscess formation. RESULTS: A total of 447 IBD patients (334 with Crohn's disease, 113 with ulcerative colitis), 51.9% female, were included and followed for a median follow-up of 45 months [range 0-113]. A total of 73.9% (326/447) were undergoing medical treatment at date of surgery, 61.5% (275/447) were treated with biologics within 3 months and 42.3% (189/447) within 4 weeks before surgery. Most surgeries (97.1%) were planned electively and 67.8% were performed laparoscopically. Major and minor complications occurred in 20.8% (93/447) of patients. Serious complications were rare: Six patients had acute postoperative bleeding, one CD patient developed peritonitis and two CD patients died postoperatively. After adjusting for age, disease duration, disease activity, Montreal classification, and medical treatment at date of surgery, no significant differences were observed regarding complications and exposure to biologics. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective single center study of 447 IBD patients goes to demonstrate that perioperative use of biologics is not associated with a higher risk of complications.

Impact of Immunotherapies on SARS-CoV-2-Infections and Other Respiratory Tract Infections during the COVID-19 Winter Season in IBD Patients.

Background: COVID-19 represents one of the most significant medical problems of our time. Aims: This study is focused on the question whether patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who receive immunotherapies are more vulnerable to respiratory tract infections and SARS-CoV-2 infections in comparison to medical staff, as a cohort with an increased infection risk, and to the general population in a COVID-19 hotspot. Methods: We analysed data regarding respiratory tract infections that were collected in our IBD registry and compared them with corresponding data from medical employees in our associated Isarklinikum hospital and from the healthy general population in Munich, Germany, over the same time frame in April and June 2020. Patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins (Ig). Results: Symptoms of respiratory tract infections occurred equally frequent in IBD patients with immunotherapies as compared to those without. Older age (>49 years), TNF-inhibitor, and ustekinumab treatment showed a significantly protective role in preventing respiratory tract symptomatic COVID-19 infections that occurred in 0.45% of all our 1.091 IBD patients. Of those, 1.8% were positive for SARS-CoV-2 Ig, identically to the general population of Munich with also 1.8% positivity. Whilst more than 3% of all COVID-19 subjects of the general population died during the first wave, none of our IBD patients died or needed referral to the ICU or oxygen treatment. Conclusions: In our study, IBD patients are as susceptible to respiratory tract infections or SARS-CoV-2 as the normal population. There is no evidence of an association between IBD therapies and increased risk of COVID-19. Interestingly, a reduced rate of COVID-19 deaths in IBD patients, the majority on immunomodulator therapy, was observed, compared to the general population. Therefore, no evidence was found to suggest that IBD medication should be withheld, and adherence should be encouraged to prevent flares. In addition to older age (>49 years), TNF inhibitors and ustekinumab show a protective role in preventing respiratory tract infections. In addition, these results add to the growing evidence that supports further investigation of TNF inhibitors as a possible treatment in the early course of severe COVID-19.

Early Start of Infliximab in Crohn's Disease Increases Rates of Endoscopic Remission and Decreases Stenosis Formation: Experiences From a Single Center Cohort.

Background: Over 10 years ago, the step-up/top-down trial demonstrated favorable outcomes of Crohn's disease (CD) after early initiation of infliximab (IFX) in patients with CD. However, data on long-term effects of this treatment strategy in daily clinical practice are scarce. Methods: This retrospective study investigated effects of early (<24 months after diagnosis) versus late intervention (>24 months) of IFX in CD on endoscopic remission (ER) rates, surgery rates, and course of CD, long term. Results: Overall, 242 CD patients (94 early, 148 late intervention) were started on IFX and followed for 24 months. Sixty-one patients with early and 86 with late intervention underwent endoscopy after start of IFX. After IFX induction, 90.3% of patients with early versus 87.8% with late intervention were in clinical remission (P = .676), compared to 89.1% versus 85.8% after 24 months (P = .554). Almost half of patients with early IFX (45.9%, n = 28/61) achieved ER within 24 months compared to only one forth with late IFX intervention (25.6%, n = 22/86, P = .013). In addition, significantly less patients with early IFX intervention (9.8%, n = 6/61) developed intestinal stenosis during 24 months follow-up compared to late IFX start (29.1%, n = 25/86, P = .007). Logistic regression revealed early IFX intervention as only relevant factor achieving ER with an odds ratio of 2.386 (95% confidence interval [1.1180; 4.825], P = .016). Conclusions: Our data on early IFX therapy in CD support early IFX intervention with more patients achieving ER, and less patients developing stricturing disease behavior. Early IFX intervention could therefore change the course of CD.

Lipocalin-2 Is a Disease Activity Marker in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Regulated by IL-17A, IL-22, and TNF-α and Modulated by IL23R Genotype Status.

BACKGROUND: Lipocalin-2 (LCN2) is a potent bacteriostatic protein. We aimed to investigate its role as a disease activity marker in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and its induction by the Th17 cytokines IL-17A, IL-22, and TNF-α in colonic epithelial cells. Moreover, we analyzed the influence of IBD-associated IL23R alleles on LCN2 serum levels in IBD patients. METHODS: LCN2 serum levels were determined in 131 IBD patients (71 with Crohn's disease [CD], 60 with ulcerative colitis [UC]) and 63 healthy controls. IBD patients were genotyped for 10 IBD-associated IL23R polymorphisms. LCN2 expression after stimulation with IL-17A, IL-22, and TNF-α was measured in human colonic epithelial cell lines. RESULTS: A significant upregulation of serum LCN2 in active IBD (median [IQR], 36.84 [21.17-73.74] ng/mL; P = 0.01) compared with healthy controls (24.22 [17.76-35.25] ng/mL) was confined to active UC (42.21 [28.97-73.74] ng/mL; P = 0.0006). LCN2 proved to be a marker of UC disease activity (area under the curve 0.75, sensitivity 0.83, specificity 0.63; P = 0.0002). IL-17A showed a synergistic effect with IL-22 and TNF-α in inducing colonic epithelial expression of LCN2 and its essential transcription factor IKBZ. In CD, LCN2 concentrations were significantly modulated by IL23R genotype status with homozygous carriers of IBD risk-increasing alleles showing particularly low LCN2 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Serum LCN2 proves to be a biomarker of active UC. Lower LCN2 levels in CD patients carrying IBD risk-increasing IL23R variants may result from a restricted upregulation of LCN2 due to an impaired Th17 immune response.