The National Bowel Cancer Audit Project: what do trusts think of the National Bowel Cancer Audit and how can it be improved?

PURPOSE: The National Bowel Cancer Audit Project (NBOCAP) collects data from hospitals in the UK and aims to improve surgical outcomes and quality of care for patients. The aims of this study were to understand why trusts were/were not participating in the NBOCAP and how to improve the quality of data collected and feedback. METHODS: This was a prospective e-survey on colorectal surgeons' attitudes towards and opinions of the NBOCAP, within trusts in the UK. A questionnaire was emailed to members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI). RESULTS: Of the 171 trusts contacted by email, 66% of trusts (n = 117) had at least 1 consultant respond. Of the 117 trusts that responded, 60 (51.2%) had submitted data to the NBOCAP. A total of 549 consultants received the questionnaire, and 159 (29.0%) consultants responded. Fifty-one per cent (n = 60) of the trusts had submitted data to the NBOCAP. Reasons for data submission included the following: comparison of a units' data with national data (56.8%), a national audit improves outcomes (45.9%) and generation of information for use at a local level (42.6%). The main reasons for non-submission were as follows: lack of technical support (23.6%), lack of funding (19.6%) and lack of dedicated audit time (18.9%). Ninety-six (60.4%) consultants felt that the audit report should identify individual trust results. Fifty-three per cent of consultants (n = 87) rated their trusts' resources for audit as being very poor or poor. CONCLUSION: Consultant members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) within hospital trusts in the UK feel participation in the National Bowel Cancer Audit improves patients' quality of care and surgical outcomes. Increased awareness of the benefits of the NBOCAP and improved allocation of resources from hospital trusts could improve participation.

The national bowel cancer audit project: the impact of organisational structure on outcome in operative bowel cancer within the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between organisational structure, process and surgical outcomes for bowel cancer surgery. METHODS: An e-survey was sent to the members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland to determine the organisational structure of their Trusts. Responses were combined with the National Bowel Cancer Audit (NBOCAP) data. Items investigated included; number of consultants, nurse specialists, volume of cases and intensive care facilities. Main outcome measures included: 30-day risk-adjusted mortality, length of stay (LOS), lymph node yield and circumferential margin involvement (CRM). RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen Trusts responded (65.8%), matched to 7666 patient episodes (NBOCAP data) from 54 (62.8%)Trusts who submitted data to the audit. Trusts treating <190 cases/annum (p > 0.001), <4 colorectal consultants (p > 0.001), <4 HDU beds (p > 0001) and <8 ITU beds (p > 0001) were more likely to have a 30-day-risk-adjusted mortality twice that of the national mean. Sixty five percent (n = 1603) of Trusts treating ≥ 190 cases/annum harvested ≥ 12 lymph nodes vs. 58.3% (n = 1435) in Trusts <190 cases/annum (p < 0.001). Trusts with ≥ 2 pathologists with an interest in bowel cancer harvested ≥ 12 lymph nodes more frequently (p=<0.001) and were more likely to identify extramural vascular invasion in the specimen (p = 0.015). Negative CRM was achieved in 81.4% (n = 81.4) of patients in Trusts treating ≥ 190 cases vs. 66.5% (n = 569) in Trusts<190 cases/annum (p < 0.001). Trusts offering fast track discharge were more likely to have a LOS < 15 days (p = 0.006). Surgeons treating ≤ 35 cases/annum had increased major post-operative complications (<35 cases = 70.2% vs. ≥ 35 cases = 21.9%; p < 0.001), however 30 day risk adjusted mortality was not increased in surgeons treating <35 cases/annum. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the organisational infrastructure of hospitals appears to have as great an impact on patient outcomes as the volume of cases performed by hospital Trusts.

Development of a pouch functional score following restorative proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUND: The influence of function on quality of life after primary restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) was determined with the aim of developing a pouch functional score. METHODS: The Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) score was determined in 4013 patients undergoing RPC between 1977 and 2005 (mean(s.d.) follow-up 7.0(5.1) years; 13 105 follow-up episodes). Linear regression analysis was used to identify independent symptom domains of function as possible predictors of quality of life to develop and validate a pouch functional score. RESULTS: CGQL scores at 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years were 85.0, 87.5, 87.5, 85.0 and 82.5 respectively (P = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the symptom domains of stool frequency (24 h, nocturnal), urgency, incontinence and medication (antidiarrhoeals, antibiotics) were independently associated with CGQL (P < 0.001). The beta coefficients within each symptom domain were then adjusted to create a scale of 0-30 for practical use, the Pouch Functional Score (PFS), which correlated with the CGQL score (r(s) = -0.47, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Stool frequency, urgency, incontinence and need for medication are major determinants of quality of life following RPC. The PFS demonstrated good correlation with CGQL.

A systematic review of postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The use of epidural analgesia is considered fundamental in Enhanced Recovery Protocols. However its value in the perioperative management of laparoscopic colorectal surgical patients is unclear and analgesic regimens vary. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effects of various analgesic regimes on outcomes following laparoscopic colectomy. METHOD: A systematic review of studies assessing analgesic regimes following laparoscopic colorectal resection was performed. The primary outcome of interest was length of hospital stay whilst the secondary outcomes included pain, time to tolerate a normal diet, return of bowel function and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified, five of which compared epidural vs patient controlled analgesia/intra-venous morphine. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of outcomes, except pain control which was superior in the epidural group. Spinal anaesthesia using intrathecal morphine in addition to local anaesthetic, and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents have also been shown to reduce postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of data assessing the benefits of postoperative analgesic regimes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery and none of the protocols were shown to be clearly superior. Further studies, including the assessment of spinal analgesia are required to determine the most appropriate analgesic regime following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Long-term failure and function after restorative proctocolectomy - a multi-centre study of patients from the UK National Ileal Pouch Registry.

OBJECTIVE: There is little information on the long-term failure and function after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC). The results of data submitted to a national registry were analysed. METHOD: The UK National Pouch Registry was established in 2004. By 2006, it comprised data collected from ten centres between 1976 and 2006. The long-term failure and functional outcome were determined. Trends over time were assessed using the gamma statistic or the Kruskal-Wallis statistic wherever appropriate. RESULTS: In all, 2491 patients underwent primary RPC over a median of 54 months (range 1 month to 28.9 years). Of these, 127 (5.1%) underwent abdominal salvage surgery. The incidence of failure (excision or indefinite diversion) was 7.7% following primary and 27.5% following salvage RPC (P < 0.001). The median frequency of defaecation/24 h was five including one at night. Nocturnal seepage occurred in 8% at 1 year, rising to 15.4% at 20 years (P = 0.037). Urgency was experienced by 5.1% of patients at 1 year rising to 9.1% at 15 years (P = 0.022). Stool frequency and the need for antidiarrhoeal medication were greater following salvage RPC. CONCLUSION: In patients retaining anal function after RPC, frequency of defaecation was stable over 20 years. Faecal urgency and minor incontinence worsened with time. Function after salvage RPC was significantly worse.

Measuring sexual and urinary outcomes in women after rectal cancer excision.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate sexual and urinary dysfunction in women who underwent rectal cancer excision, and the influence of tumor and treatment variables on long-term outcomes. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on 295 women who underwent rectal cancer excision at a tertiary referral colorectal center from 1998 to 2006. Sexual and urinary function was assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to five years after surgery. Functional outcomes were assessed by using univariate and multivariate regression analysis, chi-squared test for trend, or Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 60.9 years. Anterior resection was performed in 222 patients (75.2 percent) and abdominoperineal resection in 73 patients (24.7 percent). Patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection were less sexually active (25 vs. 50 percent; P = 0.02) and had a lower frequency of intercourse than anterior resection patients at one year after surgery (anterior resection, 3 (0-5) (median interquartile range); abdominoperineal resection 0 (0-4); P = 0.029). The frequency of intercourse improved over time for abdominoperineal resection (4 months, 0 (0-0) median interquartile range; 5 years, 3 (0.25-4) median interquartile range; P = 0.028). Abdominoperineal resection was associated with increased dyspareunia (odds ratio, 5.75; 95 percent confidence interval (CI), 1.87-17.6; P = 0.002), urinary urgency (odds ratio, 8.52; 95 percent CI, 2.81-25.8; P < 0.001), incontinence (odds ratio, 2.41; 95 percent CI, 1.11-5.26; P = 0.026), poor stream (odds ratio, 5.64, 95 percent CI, 2.55-12.5; P

A comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 1909 patients.

AIM: To compare outcomes between pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and extended pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) from all published comparative studies in the literature. METHODS: Using meta-analytical techniques the present study compared operative details, post-operative adverse events and survival following PD and EPD. Comparative studies published between 1988 and 2005 of PD versus EPD were included. End points were classified into peri-operative details, post-operative complications including 30day mortality, and survival as measured during follow up. A random effect model was employed. RESULTS: Sixteen comparative studies comprising 1909 patients (865 PD and 1044 EPD), including 3 randomized controlled trials with 454 patients (226 PD and 228 EPD) were identified. Tumour size was comparable between the groups (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.16 cm, p=0.76). Significantly more lymph nodes were harvested from those patients undergoing EPD (WMD p=14 nodes, p< or =0.001). Operative time was longer in EPD (WMD -48.9 min, p<0.001) and there was a trend towards fewer positive resection margins (odds ratio (OR) 1.78, p=0.080). Peri-operative adverse events were similar between the groups with only delayed gastric emptying (OR 0.59, p=0.030) occurring less frequently in the PD group. Peri-operative mortality (OR 1.48, p=0.180) and long-term survival (hazard ratio 0.77, p=0.100) showed a non-significant trend favouring EPD. CONCLUSIONS: EPD is associated with a greater nodal harvest and fewer positive resection margins than PD. However, the risk of delayed gastric emptying is increased and no significant survival benefit has been shown. Better designed, adequately powered studies are required to settle this question.

WITHDRAWN: Meta-analysis: the use of adhesion prevention membranes in abdominal surgery.

Ahead of Print article withdrawn by publisher.

A comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 2822 patients.

BACKGROUND: The gold-standard for surgical excision of peri-ampullary tumours has not been established despite numerous studies, due to conflicting outcomes. AIM: To consolidate the published evidence and compare outcomes between pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) across all published comparative studies. METHODS: Using meta-analytical techniques the study compared: operative details, post-operative adverse events and survival following PD and PPPD. Comparative studies published between 1986 and 2005 of PD versus PPPD were included. A random effect model was employed, with significance reported at the 5% level. RESULTS: 32 studies comprising 2822 patients (1335 PD and 1487 PPPD), including 5 randomized controlled trials with 421 patients (215 PD and 206 PPPD) were included. Patients undergoing PPPD were found to have smaller tumours (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.54 cm, p=0.030), although no significant difference in the number of patients with stage III or IV disease existed between the groups (odds ratio, OR 1.55, p=0.320). Decreased operating times (WMD -41.3 min, p=0.010) and fewer blood transfusions (WMD -0.9 units, p<0.001) were observed in the PPPD group. There was no difference in post-operative complications, including pancreatic and biliary leaks or fistulae, between the two groups. It was suggested that peri-operative mortality was decreased in the PPPD group (OR 1.7, p=0.040), and overall survival was better (hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, p=0.02), although this did not remain significant on subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Both PD and PPPD had similar peri-operative adverse events, however, in overall analysis PPPD has lower mortality and improved long-term patient survival, although this was not reflected in the sub-group analysis.

Does the laparoscopic colorectal surgery learning curve adversely affect the results of colorectal cancer resection? A 3-year prospective study in a district general hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is slowly being adopted across the UK. We present a 3-year prospective study of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections in a district general hospital. METHOD: Data relating to premorbid, operative and postoperative parameters were recorded for all patients undergoing laparoscopic, open, planned converted (laparoscopic assisted) and unplanned converted resections prospectively from April 2003 to April 2006. RESULTS: A total of 238 colorectal resections were performed, 153 of which were for cancer. Of these 44 (29%) were open, 77 (50%) were laparoscopic and 32 (21%) were converted [26 (17%) planned and six (4%) unplanned]. Blood loss was less in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group (P = 0.02) as was intra-operative fluid replacement (P = 0.01). Time to requiring oral analgesia alone was shorter (P = 0.001) and bowel function returned earlier (P = 0.001) in the laparoscopic group. This is reflected in a trend towards a shorter hospital stay for the laparoscopic group compared with the open group (P = 0.049). The operating time of the laparoscopic group was not significantly longer (P = 0.38). The complication rate was similar between groups (P = 0.31) and the mortality in the laparoscopic group was 1.3%. CONCLUSION: Changing from open to laparoscopic dissection for colorectal cancer is safe even during the initial learning curve. There are clear potential short-term benefits for patients and the technique can be introduced without penalties in terms of reduced surgical throughput.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: local recurrence rate following resection of rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a safe and effective treatment for the excision of benign rectal adenomas. In recent years it has been used for the excision of malignant lesions, although its use in this context remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the local recurrence of rectal cancers following local excision by TEM. METHOD: Forty-two patients with rectal cancer were treated by TEM between 1998 and 2005. However, six patients went on to have immediate radical surgery and are excluded from the study. Of the remaining 36 the treatment intention was for cure in 16 (38.1%), compromise in 17 patients unfit for radical surgery (40.5%), and palliation in three (7.1%). RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 75 years (range 41-90). The mean lesion area was 15 cm(2) (range 0.8-42) and mean distance from the dentate line was 6.6 cm (range 0-11). The mean follow up was 34 months (range 4-94). During the follow-up period there have been eight local recurrences (22%). The recurrence rates were 26% (6/23) for pT1, 22% (2/9) for pT2 and 0% (0/4) for pT3 lesions. The mean time to recurrence was 18.3 months (range 5-42). CONCLUSION: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe procedure with obvious advantages over radical procedures. However, in this study the local recurrence rate is high. The recurrence rate may be an acceptable compromise in elderly or medically unfit patients but is hard to justify for curative intent.

Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Radical resection of tumours of the distal rectum has generally entailed an abdominoperineal excision, but the recognition of shorter safe distal resection margins, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and the application of the technique of intersphincteric resection (ISR) have led to the prospect of restorative surgery for patients with distally situated tumours. The present study examines the indications, techniques and outcomes following ISR. METHOD: A literature search was performed to identify studies reporting outcomes following ISR for low rectal cancer. The outcomes of interest included short-term adverse events, functional and manometric results, postoperative quality of life and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies reflecting the experience of 13 units and 612 patients were included. Operative mortality following ISR was 1.6% (inter-unit range 0-5%) and anastomotic leak rate 10.5% (inter-unit range 0-48.4%). The pooled rate of local recurrence was 9.5% (range 0-31% between units) with an average 5-year survival of 81.5%. Most studies recorded a significant reduction in resting anal pressure but not squeeze pressure following surgery, but urgency was reported in up to 58.8% of patients. Functional outcomes and quality of life may be improved using colonic j-pouch reconstruction. The use of chemoradiotherapy can offer benefits in terms of oncologic result, but at the cost of worse functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Careful case selection and counselling is required if satisfactory results are to be achieved following ISR for low rectal cancers. In selected patients, however, the technique offers sphincter preserving surgery with acceptable oncologic and functional results.

Strictureplasty vs resection in small bowel Crohn's disease: an evaluation of short-term outcomes and recurrence.

AIM: To compare postoperative adverse events and recurrence following strictureplasty or bowel resection in patients with small bowel Crohn's disease (CD). METHOD: A literature search was performed to identify studies published between 1980 and 2006 comparing outcomes of CD patients undergoing either strictureplasty or bowel resection. Hazard ratios were calculated from Kaplan-Meier plots of cumulative recurrence data. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed. Random-effect meta-analytical techniques were employed. Sensitivity analysis and assessment of heterogeneity were performed. RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 688 CD patients (strictureplasty n = 311, 45%; resection with or without strictureplasty n = 377, 55%) were included. Patients undergoing strictureplasty alone had a lower risk of developing postoperative complications than those who underwent resection (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.31-1.16) although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.13). Surgical recurrence after strictureplasty was more likely than after resection (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.96-1.93, P = 0.09). Patients who had a resection had a significantly longer recurrence-free survival than those undergoing strictureplasty alone (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.15, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with small bowel CD undergoing strictureplasty alone may have fewer postoperative complications than those undergoing a concomitant bowel resection. However, surgical recurrence maybe higher following strictureplasty alone than with a concomitant small bowel resection. Patients may require appropriate preoperative counselling regarding the pros and cons of each operative technique.

Diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of the circumferential margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Circumferential margin involvement (CMI) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with rectal cancer. This meta-analysis aims at evaluating the diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the preoperative evaluation of CMI in patients with rectal cancer. METHOD: Quantitative meta-analysis was performed comparing MRI against histology after total mesorectal excision. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated for each study. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and subgroup analysis were undertaken. Study quality and heterogeneity were evaluated. Meta-regression meta-analysis was used to evaluate the significance of the difference in relative DORs. RESULTS: Nine studies evaluating 529 patients were included. Pooled results showed an overall sensitivity and specificity for MRI detecting CMI preoperatively of 94% and 85% respectively. The SROC analysis demonstrated an overall weighted area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (DOR 57.21, 95% CI 18.21-179.77), without significant heterogeneity between the studies (Q-value 14.66, P = 0.06). Good study quality further increased the sensitivity and specificity of MRI. The use of a 1.5 Tesla coil, a phased array coil and the inclusion of two interpreters also resulted in high preoperative diagnostic precision. Meta-regression meta-analysis showed a significant difference in the DOR for studies published in or since 2003 (P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging can accurately predict CMI preoperatively for rectal cancer in single units and this is reproducible across different centres. This strategy has important implications for selection of patients for adjuvant therapy prior to surgery.

Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The choice of ileal pouch reservoir has been a contentious subject with no consensus as to which technique provides better function. This study aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes of three ileal reservoir designs. METHOD: Comparative studies published between 1985 and 2000 of J, W and S ileal pouch reservoirs were included. Meta-analytical techniques were employed to compare postoperative complications, pouch failure, and functional and physiological outcomes. Quality of life following surgery was also assessed. RESULTS: Eighteen studies, comprising 1519 patients (689 J pouch, 306 W pouch and 524 S pouch) were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of early postoperative complications between the three groups. The frequency of defecation over 24 h favoured the use of either a W or S pouch [J vs S: weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.48, P < 0.001; J vs W: WMD 0.97, P = 0.01]. The S pouch was associated with an increased need for pouch intubation (S vs J: OR 6.19, P = 0.04). The use of a J pouch was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of use of anti-diarrhoeal medication (J vs S: OR 2.80, P = 0.01; J vs W: OR 3.55, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: All three reservoirs had similar perioperative complication rates. The S pouch was associated with the need for anal intubation. There was less frequency and less need for antidiarrhoeal agents with the W rather than the J pouch.

Safe liver resection following chemotherapy for colorectal metastases is a matter of timing.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) can improve the resectability of hepatic colorectal metastases (CRM). However, there is concern regarding its impact on operative risk. We reviewed 750 consecutive liver resections performed for CRM in a single unit (1996-2005) to evaluate whether NC affected morbidity and mortality. Redo hepatic resections or patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy following primary resection were excluded. A total of 245 resections were performed in patients not requiring NC (control group) (mean age 63, 67% male) and 252 in patients who had NC (mean age 62, 67% male). The mean (s.d.) duration of surgery was less in the control group (241(64) vs 255(64)min, P=0.014) as was the mean blood loss (390(264) vs 449(424)ml, P=0.069). Postoperative mortality (2 vs 2%) and morbidity (27 vs 29%, P=0.34) was similar between groups. More NC patients developed septic (2.4%) or respiratory (10.3%) complications compared to controls (0 and 5.3%, P<0.03), with significantly more surgical complications if the interval between stopping NC and undergoing surgery was

Comparison of colonic stenting and open surgery for malignant large bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Colonic stents potentially offer effective palliation for those with bowel obstruction attributable to incurable malignancy, and a "bridge to surgery" for those in whom emergency surgery would necessitate a stoma. The current study compared the outcomes of stents and open surgery in the management of malignant large bowel obstruction. METHODS: A literature search of the Medline, Ovid, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed to identify comparative studies reporting outcomes on colonic stenting and surgery for large bowel obstruction. Random effects meta-analytical techniques were applied to identify differences in outcomes between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis of high quality studies, those reporting on more than 35 patients, those solely concerning colorectal cancer and studies performing intention to treat analysis was undertaken to evaluate the study heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies satisfied the criteria for inclusion, with outcomes reported for 451 patients. Stent insertion was attempted for 244 patients (54.1%), and proved successful for 226 (92.6%). The length of hospital stay was shorter by 7.72 days in the stent group (p < 0.001), which also had lower mortality (p = 0.03) and fewer medical complications (p < 0.001). Stoma formation at any point during management was significantly lower than in the stent group (odds ratio, 0.02; p < 0.001), and "bridging to surgery" did not adversely influence survival. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic stenting offers effective palliation for malignant bowel obstruction, with short lengths of hospital stay and a low rate for stoma formation, but data on quality of life and economic evaluation are limited. There is no evidence of differences in long-term survival between those who have stents followed by subsequent resection and those undergoing emergency bowel resection.