Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 80(4): 592-598, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34732360

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Discectomy is one of the preferred temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgical procedures for the treatment of internal derangements when conservative and minimally invasive treatments have failed. The purpose of the current study is to investigate whether a TMJ discectomy operation influences auditory function and clinical variables. METHODS: This prospective study was composed of patients who underwent a TMJ discectomy operation between 2016 and 2020. Auditory function was evaluated with pure tone audiometry, tympanometry, and acoustic reflex tests at preoperatively (T0), postoperative first week (T1), first month (T2), and third month (T3). Clinical parameters including maximum mouth opening (MMO) and TMJ pain were also evaluated at T0, T1, T2, T3, and sixth month (T4). RESULTS: The study consisted of 17 patients (5 males, 12 females) with a mean age of 42.65. A significant reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and MMO values compared to baseline values was achieved in all follow up periods (PT0-T1= .001; PT0-T2/T3/T4 < .001). In pure tone audiometry, a significant increase in T1-T0 comparisons at 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, 6000 Hz, 8000 Hz frequencies, and pure tone average (P = .008; P = .005; P = .012; P = .002; P = .001) was observed. In T3-T0 comparisons, a statistically significant decrease was observed in pure tone thresholds at 125 Hz and 8000 Hz frequencies (P = .008; P = .01). There was no statistically significant difference in middle ear pressure and compliance values at T1, T2, and T3 compared to T0 (P > .05). Type C tympanogram was seen in 3 patients at T1 and in 1 patient at T2. Acoustic reflex tests were positive in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although mild changes occurred in auditory tests in the early postoperative period, TMJ discectomy procedure has no permanent effect on auditory function.


Subject(s)
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Temporomandibular Joint , Adult , Diskectomy , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Temporomandibular Joint/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgery
2.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 49(8): 705-710, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33707133

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess any change between the preoperative and postoperative sizes of temporal and masseter muscles with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients undergoing unilateral temporomandibular joint surgery. This study was designed and implemented retrospectively. For clinical evaluation, a visual analog scale (VAS) and maximum mouth opening (MMO) were used. In order to make a preoperative diagnosis and perform a 6-month control, muscle size was measured in millimeters (mm) on T1 axial sections in MRI. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 23.0 software package. Numeric variables were compared between two dependent groups using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Twelve patients who underwent unilateral discectomy plus dermis-fat grafting, with classical preauricular inverse L incision, were included in the study, and data for eleven female patients were evaluated. The difference in size between the operated and non-operated sides was found to be statistically insignificant at the preoperative stage for both masseter muscle (operated side mM: 13.264 ± 1.822 mm; non-operated side mM: 13.264 ± 2.315 mm; pM = 0.929) and temporal muscle (operated side mT: 20.345 ± 2.609 mm; non-operated side mT: 20.582 ± 2.366 mm; pT = 0.594). There was a significant size reduction in the masseter muscle on the operated side in the postoperative period (preop mM: 13.264 ± 1.822 mm; postop mM: 12.036 ± 1.728 mm; pM = 0.018). Although there was also a size reduction in the operated side of the temporal muscle in the postoperative period, that difference did not reach statistical significance (preop mT: 20.345 ± 2.609 mm; postop mT: 19.445 ± 1.603 mm; pT = 0.182). On the non-operated side, there were no significant postoperative changes in the sizes of either the masseter muscle (preop mM: 13.264 ± 2.315 mm; postop mM: 12.682 ± 2.059 mm; pM = 0.248) or the temporal muscle (preop mT: 20.582 ± 2.366; postop mT: 19.891 ± 3.487 mm; pT = 0.625). Considering the study findings as a whole, a size reduction was observed in the operated side of the masseter muscle after TMJ surgery. The etiology of this change may be surgical trauma to the temporal and masseter muscles, skeletal alteration resulting from condylar change secondary to discectomy, and patients restraining themselves from application of maximum bite force as a result of a self-protection mechanism due to postoperative pain.


Subject(s)
Masseter Muscle , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Masseter Muscle/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Temporal Muscle/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...