Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Life (Basel) ; 12(11)2022 Nov 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36362995

ABSTRACT

The aim of our study was to determine the type and frequency of chromosomal aberrations and polymorphisms in men with different degrees of spermatogenic failure in comparison to men with normozoospermia, in order to find correlations between cytogenetic findings and the abnormal results of semen analysis. In our study, we performed cytogenetic analysis in 901 infertile men, divided into five groups according to semen analysis-normozoospermia (86), asthenozoospermia (394), oligoasthenozoospermia (182), severe male factor (100), and azoospermia (139). The frequency of polymorphisms was similar in all groups (11-16%, without significant differences). The frequency of numerical and structural aberrations increases with the degree of the spermatogenic failure (3.5% in normozoospermia, 5.6% in asthenozoospermia, 9.8% in oligoasthenozoospermia, 9% in severe male factor, and 13.5% in azoospermia). We found a significantly higher incidence of numerical chromosomal aberrations in severe male factor (7%) and azoospermia (9.3%). Oligoasthenozoospermia occured in 45% of cases with translocation, compared to 20% in the group with a normal karyotype. We revealed that chromosomal translocations are tightly associated with oligoasthenozoospermia, whereas numerical chromosomal aberrations-with severe male factor and azoospermia. The impact of chromosome polymorphisms on male infertility should be studied in greater detail.

2.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 28(1): 33-37, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33355281

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Current retrospective cohort study analyses clinical database records of 4792 assisted reproduction procedures to assess the significance of target effectiveness endpoints from a safety perspective. METHODS: Stimulation protocols with urinary, recombinant or combination of both types gonadotrophin preparations are compared according to the following primary endpoints: incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), cycle cancellation, follicle count, induced estradiol values, clinical pregnancy achieved and cycles reached embryo transfer/freezing. We have investigated the incidence of cases evaluated as 'risky for OHSS' by secondary efficacy endpoints (exogenous gonadotrophin exposure, luteinising hormone and progesterone values, oocyte yield, eggs with normal maturation). The following statistical methods were applied: descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Pearson chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Only 16 cases (0.42%) of moderate and delayed OHSS were established. Three hundred and seven (8.6%) stimulation cycles have been cancelled, principally among urinary protocols. Although the clinical pregnancy rate does not differ significantly in compared groups, punctured follicle count, oocyte yield and progesterone level were higher for recombinant preparations, followed by combined and urinary protocols. Follicle count, mean estradiol and luteinising hormone levels are within the 'safe window' for all investigated groups, associated with minimised risk of stimulation cancellation. The mean follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose was highest in urinary protocols at the same duration of stimulation compared with recombinant products. The younger age, bigger follicle count, oocytes yield, mature oocytes count, percentage of fertilised oocytes, more embryos transferred and the later day of embryo transfer are critical for both assisted reproduction techniques (ART) success rate and the safety profile of sterility treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Safety surveillance of ART exceeds the incidence of OHSS. Suboptimal effectiveness of stimulation protocols may also jeopardise the well-being of ART patients. Gonadotrophin exposure, induced values of sex hormones, and quantity and quality of extracted oocytes should be considered to minimise any unintended suffering of treated couples.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/therapeutic use , Humans , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/drug therapy , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/epidemiology , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/prevention & control , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/methods , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
3.
Hum Reprod Open ; 2020(2): hoaa009, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32395637

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: What is the recommended management of ovarian stimulation, based on the best available evidence in the literature? SUMMARY ANSWER: The guideline development group formulated 84 recommendations answering 18 key questions on ovarian stimulation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI has been discussed briefly in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline on fertility problems, and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist has published a statement on ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction. There are, to our knowledge, no evidence-based guidelines dedicated to the process of ovarian stimulation. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: The guideline was developed according to the structured methodology for development of ESHRE guidelines. After formulation of key questions by a group of experts, literature searches and assessments were performed. Papers published up to 8 November 2018 and written in English were included. The critical outcomes for this guideline were efficacy in terms of cumulative live birth rate per started cycle or live birth rate per started cycle, as well as safety in terms of the rate of occurrence of moderate and/or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Based on the collected evidence, recommendations were formulated and discussed until consensus was reached within the guideline group. A stakeholder review was organized after finalization of the draft. The final version was approved by the guideline group and the ESHRE Executive Committee. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The guideline provides 84 recommendations: 7 recommendations on pre-stimulation management, 40 recommendations on LH suppression and gonadotrophin stimulation, 11 recommendations on monitoring during ovarian stimulation, 18 recommendations on triggering of final oocyte maturation and luteal support and 8 recommendations on the prevention of OHSS. These include 61 evidence-based recommendations-of which only 21 were formulated as strong recommendations-and 19 good practice points and 4 research-only recommendations. The guideline includes a strong recommendation for the use of either antral follicle count or anti-Müllerian hormone (instead of other ovarian reserve tests) to predict high and poor response to ovarian stimulation. The guideline also includes a strong recommendation for the use of the GnRH antagonist protocol over the GnRH agonist protocols in the general IVF/ICSI population, based on the comparable efficacy and higher safety. For predicted poor responders, GnRH antagonists and GnRH agonists are equally recommended. With regards to hormone pre-treatment and other adjuvant treatments (metformin, growth hormone (GH), testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, aspirin and sildenafil), the guideline group concluded that none are recommended for increasing efficacy or safety. LIMITATIONS REASON FOR CAUTION: Several newer interventions are not well studied yet. For most of these interventions, a recommendation against the intervention or a research-only recommendation was formulated based on insufficient evidence. Future studies may require these recommendations to be revised. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The guideline provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice in ovarian stimulation, based on the best evidence available. In addition, a list of research recommendations is provided to promote further studies in ovarian stimulation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings, with the literature searches and with the dissemination of the guideline. The guideline group members did not receive payment. F.B. reports research grant from Ferring and consulting fees from Merck, Ferring, Gedeon Richter and speaker's fees from Merck. N.P. reports research grants from Ferring, MSD, Roche Diagnositics, Theramex and Besins Healthcare; consulting fees from MSD, Ferring and IBSA; and speaker's fees from Ferring, MSD, Merck Serono, IBSA, Theramex, Besins Healthcare, Gedeon Richter and Roche Diagnostics. A.L.M reports research grants from Ferring, MSD, IBSA, Merck Serono, Gedeon Richter and TEVA and consulting fees from Roche, Beckman-Coulter. G.G. reports consulting fees from MSD, Ferring, Merck Serono, IBSA, Finox, Theramex, Gedeon-Richter, Glycotope, Abbott, Vitrolife, Biosilu, ReprodWissen, Obseva and PregLem and speaker's fees from MSD, Ferring, Merck Serono, IBSA, Finox, TEVA, Gedeon Richter, Glycotope, Abbott, Vitrolife and Biosilu. E.B. reports research grants from Gedeon Richter; consulting and speaker's fees from MSD, Ferring, Abbot, Gedeon Richter, Merck Serono, Roche Diagnostics and IBSA; and ownership interest from IVI-RMS Valencia. P.H. reports research grants from Gedeon Richter, Merck, IBSA and Ferring and speaker's fees from MSD, IBSA, Merck and Gedeon Richter. J.U. reports speaker's fees from IBSA and Ferring. N.M. reports research grants from MSD, Merck and IBSA; consulting fees from MSD, Merck, IBSA and Ferring and speaker's fees from MSD, Merck, IBSA, Gedeon Richter and Theramex. M.G. reports speaker's fees from Merck Serono, Ferring, Gedeon Richter and MSD. S.K.S. reports speaker's fees from Merck, MSD, Ferring and Pharmasure. E.K. reports speaker's fees from Merck Serono, Angellini Pharma and MSD. M.K. reports speaker's fees from Ferring. T.T. reports speaker's fees from Merck, MSD and MLD. The other authors report no conflicts of interest. DISCLAIMER: This guideline represents the views of ESHRE, which were achieved after careful consideration of the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. In the absence of scientific evidence on certain aspects, a consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders has been obtained. Adherence to these clinical practice guidelines does not guarantee a successful or specific outcome, nor does it establish a standard of care. Clinical practice guidelines do not replace the need for application of clinical judgment to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type. ESHRE makes no warranty, express or implied, regarding the clinical practice guidelines and specifically excludes any warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular use or purpose. (Full disclaimer available at www.eshre.eu/guidelines.) †ESHRE Pages content is not externally peer reviewed. The manuscript has been approved by the Executive Committee of ESHRE.

5.
J Reprod Infertil ; 15(4): 173-83, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25473625

ABSTRACT

The success rate of reproductive treatment methods depends on many different factors. The most important and discussed ones in the literature are maternal age, the causes of infertility, the ovarian response to stimulation, the influence of the male factor and sperm quality, embryo quality and the various uterine pathologies. Some couples fail repeatedly after transferring good quality embryos without any obvious reason and this becomes a major continuing problem after IVF/ICSI procedures. It can be speculated that in these couples, insufficiency of the endometrium might be a possible reason for implantation failure. This review article summarized current literature describing the consecutive endomertial procedures involved in successful embryo implantation. It is believed that efforts to align criteria for definition of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and attempts to classify different RIF types would develop guidelines for treatment procedures which would result in an increase in patients' opportunities to conceive.

6.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 169(2): 261-7, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23664380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a widely used technique for couples at genetic risk and involves the diagnosis and transfer of unaffected embryos generated through in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques. STUDY DESIGN: For those couples who are at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring, preimplantation embryos can be selected according to their genetic status as well as human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility with the affected child. Stem cells from the resulting baby's umbilical cord blood can be used for transplantation to the affected sibling without graft rejection. RESULTS: Here we report successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after the birth of a healthy infant, who was born after successful PGD testing with both cleavage stage and blastocyst stage biopsy for the purpose of diagnosis of ß-thalassemia and HLA compatibility. CONCLUSION: The specific feature of this work is not only to have the first successful HSCT achieved in Bulgaria after using preimplantation HLA typing technique, it also demonstrates how to accomplish this success via cross-border collaboration of different units, which makes the application of these sophisticated methods possible in hospitals not having the necessary equipments and expertise.


Subject(s)
HLA Antigens/genetics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Preimplantation Diagnosis , beta-Thalassemia/therapy , Adult , Amniocentesis , Biopsy , Female , Genotyping Techniques , Humans , Live Birth , Male , Pregnancy , beta-Thalassemia/diagnosis , beta-Thalassemia/immunology
7.
Fertil Steril ; 93(1): 210-9, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19006798

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether first-trimester human decidua contains multipotent stromal cells capable of differentiating into other cell lines. DESIGN: In vitro-cultured decidual stromal cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and induced to differentiate into osteogenic and adipogenic lineages, endothelial cells, and PRL-secreting mature decidual cells. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENT(S): Eight decidua samples were collected from healthy women aged 26-32 years undergoing elective vaginal surgical terminations of early pregnancy (8-10 gestational weeks). INTERVENTION(S): Cell suspensions from human decidual stromal cells were cultured at clonogenic concentrations and in bulk under differentiation conditions and analyzed for specific markers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Multipotent differentiation potential of decidual stromal cells. RESULT(S): Decidual stromal cells express the surface markers specific to cells of mesenchymal origin as analyzed by flow cytometry. A pool of the decidual stromal cells can be induced to differentiate into mature PRL-secreting decidual cells and into osteogenic, adipogenic, and endothelial cells expressing the corresponding specific markers. CONCLUSION(S): It is demonstrated for the first time that first-trimester human decidua contains multipotent mesenchymal stem cells that can be grown in vitro for prolonged periods, have clonogenic properties, can differentiate into different cell lineages, and express surface markers specific to mesenchymal stem cells.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Cell Lineage , Decidua/cytology , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/physiology , Multipotent Stem Cells/physiology , Stromal Cells/physiology , Abortion, Induced , Adipogenesis , Adult , Biomarkers/metabolism , Cell Proliferation , Cells, Cultured , Endothelial Cells/physiology , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Immunophenotyping , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/immunology , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Multipotent Stem Cells/immunology , Multipotent Stem Cells/metabolism , Osteogenesis , Phenotype , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Prolactin/metabolism , Stromal Cells/immunology , Stromal Cells/metabolism , Time Factors
8.
Am J Reprod Immunol ; 62(1): 25-33, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19527229

ABSTRACT

PROBLEM: Maternal immune response to fetal tissues is modified in such way that it favors the development of pregnancy. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G, progesterone and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been identified as potent immunomodulatory agents in different experimental systems and the interactions between these three factors are studies in this paper. METHOD OF STUDY: Human MSCs are isolated from human adipose tissue, bone marrow and decidua are cultured in the presence of progesterone and the expression of HLA-G is followed-up at protein and mRNA levels. RESULTS: The MSCs cultured in the presence of progesterone express increased levels of both cell surface and cytoplasmic HLA-G when compared with the control MSCs. CONCLUSION: Progesterone up-regulates the expression by MSCs of HLA-G which is a major player in maintenance of the immune balance between the mother and the fetus. MSCs are newly detected targets of progesterone with well documented immunomodulatory activity.


Subject(s)
HLA Antigens/biosynthesis , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/biosynthesis , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/immunology , Progesterone/metabolism , Adipose Tissue/immunology , Adipose Tissue/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cells, Cultured , Decidua/immunology , Female , HLA-G Antigens , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/drug effects , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Progesterone/pharmacology , Progestins/pharmacology , Up-Regulation
9.
J Reprod Immunol ; 78(2): 94-101, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18243332

ABSTRACT

Progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) has been described as an active factor intimately involved in regulation of the immune response in pregnancy. It has been shown that PIBF biased the cytokine balance to Th2-type in pregnancy and inhibited the activity of NK cells. The biological roles of PIBF would be better defined if methods for its detection and measurement in biological fluids are available. However, so far, reliable antibodies have not been developed to be used as specific probes. A monoclonal antibody designated as MAB 3A6 was produced and characterized. MAB 3A6 reacts specifically with PIBF. It can detect this protein in biological fluids when tested by immunoblot and recognizes PIBF expressed on the surface of lymphocytes of pregnant women stimulated in vitro with progesterone. The characteristics of MAB 3A6 makes it the possible basis for development of a clinically applicable assay to assess the presence and concentration of PIBF in biological samples.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology , Placenta/immunology , Pregnancy Proteins/analysis , Pregnancy Proteins/immunology , Suppressor Factors, Immunologic/analysis , Suppressor Factors, Immunologic/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/biosynthesis , Female , Humans , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/drug effects , Pregnancy Proteins/urine , Progesterone/pharmacology , Suppressor Factors, Immunologic/urine
10.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 6: 686-90, 2006 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16799739

ABSTRACT

The implementation of safe and maximally effective ovarian stimulation is a major aim for in vitro fertilization (IVF) teams. The goal of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is to supply enough oocytes with normal maturation to insure the consequent biological procedures. A variety of different stimulation protocols have been suggested and an individual selection of the correct stimulation protocol is mandatory. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the correlation between number of retrieved oocytes and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) after IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedures. We reviewed 1017 cycles in a total of 975 patients. The study results clearly demonstrate that the aspiration of less than 5 oocytes significantly reduced pregnancy rate. The aspiration of a large number of oocytes (>15) does not lead to an increase of the treatment effect and, at the same time, increases the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The major goal is to obtain 5-15 oocytes as a "gold standard", connected to optimal pregnancy rate after assisted reproduction (ART).


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Rate , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Adult , Female , Humans , Oocytes , Ovulation Induction/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...