COVID-19 Positive Status is Associated with Increased In-hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may have concomitant positive coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to compare the risk of in-hospital mortality in patients primarily hospitalized for AMI with or without concomitant COVID-19 positive status. Using the random-effects model, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published articles from December 1, 2019, to April 1, 2022. There were eight studies with 10,128 patients, including 612 patients with COVID and 9516 patients without COVID. A total of 261 patients (42.64%) with COVID-19 positive and 612 patients (6.43%) with negative COVID-19 status died in the hospital. Pooled data showed that patients with a primary diagnosis of AMI with COVID-19 infection had more than five times increased risk of in-hospital mortality compared to patients without COVID-19 (OR: 5.06, 95% CI: 3.61, 7.09; I2 = 35%, P < 0.001). However, pooled data from five studies with adjustment of baseline differences in patient demographics and characteristics, comorbidities, and in-hospital pharmacology revealed more than three times increased risk of in-hospital mortality compared to patients who had primary AMI without COVID-19 infection (aOR: 3.47, 95% CI: 2.21, 5.45; I2 = 0%, P < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) had lower in-hospital mortality (OR 4.23, 95% CI: 3.31, 5.40; I2 = 0%, P < 0.001) compared to non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (OR 9.97, 95% CI: 5.71, 17.41; I2 = 0%, P < 0.001) (p-value = 0.006). Our study shows that COVID-19 infection is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with index hospitalization for AMI.

Statin-induced necrotizing autoimmune myopathy: an extremely rare adverse effect from statin use.

Statins are widely prescribed medications to prevent cardiovascular events. While self-limited statin myopathy is relatively common, statin-induced necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (SINAM) is extremely uncommon, with incidence of two cases per million per year. We present a case of SINAM after a decade of atorvastatin use, leading to debilitating weakness. A 71-year-old male presented with recurrent falls due to extreme bilateral lower-extremity weakness without pain or sensory changes. No fever, chills, rash, joint pain, recent infection or medication changes were reported. Reported taking atorvastatin 80 mg daily for 10 years. Physical examination revealed significant muscle wasting on right deltoid and proximal muscle weakness in all extremities. Lab tests included elevated creatinine kinase, aldolase, ESR, CRP and transaminases. Anti-HMGCR antibody was significantly elevated. TSH, serum protein electrophoresis and RPR were unremarkable. ANA, Anti-Jo-1, anti-Mi2, anti-SRP, anti-ds-DNA, anti-SSA and anti-SSB antibodies were negative. MRI of thigh revealed diffuse myositis. Electromyogram revealed an acute myopathic process. Muscle biopsy showed muscle necrosis and C5b-9 sarcolemmal deposits on non-necrotic fibers without rimmed vacuoles. He was diagnosed with SINAM. Statin was discontinued, and steroid, immunoglobulins and azathioprine were started with gradual improvement. Unlike the self-limiting statin myopathy, SINAM is more severe and is associated with significant proximal muscle weakness, markedly elevated CK and persistent symptoms despite statin discontinuation. Anti-HMGCR antibodies are present in 100% of cases. Immunosuppressants are the mainstay of treatment, and statin rechallenge should never be done in these cases. Although relatively rare, physicians should be cognizant of SINAM.

Acute milk-alkali syndrome

Summary: A 74-year-old woman presented with progressive lethargy, confusion, poor appetite and abdominal pain. She was found to have non-PTH-mediated severe hypercalcemia with renal failure and metabolic alkalosis. Extensive workup for hypercalcemia to rule out alternate etiology was unrevealing. Upon further questioning, she was taking excess calcium carbonate (Tums) for her worsening heartburn. She was diagnosed with milk-alkali syndrome (MAS). Her hypercalcemia and alkalosis recovered completely with aggressive hydration along with improvement in her renal function. High index of suspicion should be maintained and history of drug and supplements, especially calcium ingestion, should be routinely asked in patients presenting with hypercalcemia to timely diagnose MAS and prevent unnecessary tests and treatments. Learning Points: Suspect milk-alkali syndrome in patients with hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis and renal failure, especially in context of ingestion of excess calcium-containing supplements. Careful history of over-the-counter medications, supplements and diet is crucial to diagnose milk-alkali syndrome. Milk-alkali syndrome may cause severe hypercalcemia in up to 25­30% of cases.

Primary Hyperparathyroidism in Pregnancy: Successful Parathyroidectomy during First Trimester.

Primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy can result in significant maternal and fetal complications. When indicated, prompt parathyroidectomy in the early second trimester is considered the treatment of choice. Pregnant patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who have an indication for parathyroidectomy during the first trimester represent a therapeutic challenge. We present the case of a 32-year-old primigravida who presented with symptomatic hypercalcemia from her primary hyperparathyroidism. She remained symptomatic despite aggressive conservative management and underwent parathyroidectomy in her first trimester with excellent outcomes.

Hypercalcemia associated with cosmetic injections: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Cosmetic injections with silicone and polymethylmethacrylate are not FDA approved for augmentation of body parts such as breast, buttock or legs, but they have been widely used for decades. Cosmetic injections can cause foreign body granulomas and occasionally severe and life-threatening hypercalcemia. We aimed to systematically analyze the published literature on cosmetic injection-associated hypercalcemia. METHODS: We searched relevant articles on hypercalcemia associated with various cosmetic injections and extracted relevant data on demographics, cosmetic injections used, severity of hypercalcemia, management and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 23 eligible patients from 20 articles. Mean age was 49.83 ± 14.70 years with a female preponderance (78.26% including transgender females). Silicone was most commonly used, followed by polymethylmethacrylate and paraffin oil (43.48, 30.43, and 8.70% respectively). The buttock was the most common site followed by the breast (69.57% and 39.13% respectively). Hypercalcemia developed at mean duration of 7.96 ± 7.19 years from the initial procedure. Mean ionized calcium at presentation was 2.19 ± 0.61 mmol/L and mean corrected calcium at presentation was 3.43 ± 0.31 mmol/L. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D or calcitriol) was elevated while 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and PTH were low in majority of cases. Hypercalcemia was managed conservatively with hydration, corticosteroids and bisphosphonates in majority of cases. Surgery was attempted in 2 cases but was unsuccessful. Renal failure was the most common complication (82.35% cases) and 2 patients died. CONCLUSION: Hypercalcemia from cosmetic injections can be severe and life threatening and can present years after the initial procedure. Cosmetic injection-associated granuloma should be considered a cause of hypercalcemia, especially in middle-aged females presenting with non-PTH-mediated, non-malignant hypercalcemia, which is often associated with elevated calcitriol; however, it should be noted that calcitriol level may be normal as well.

Outcomes following transcatheter transseptal versus transapical mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring procedures.

Introduction: Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (ViV) & valve-in-ring (ViR) are relatively novel therapeutic alternatives for patients with degenerated bioprostheses or failed annuloplasty rings whose reoperative risk is too high. The predominant procedural access for both procedures is transapical or transseptal. However, whether there are differences in outcomes of this procedure using transseptal versus transapical access has not yet been defined. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of all published articles from MEDLINE and EMBASE to explore the outcomes of these two procedural approaches. Results:total of 55 studies including 183 patients (154 ViV and 29 ViR) were included. Patients that underwent ViV (101 transapical and 53 transseptal) using the transseptal approach required more iatrogenic atrial septal defect (ASD) closure (19% versus 0.0 %; P < 0.001) and hence had a lower device success rate (68% versus 89%; P = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in procedural success and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Overall severe bleeding complications (major or life threatening) were not different the two groups (3.7% versus 7.9%; P = 0.321). In the ViR group (19 transapical and 10 transseptal), no difference in procedural success, device success or 30-day outcomes were identified between transseptal and transapical groups, although sample size was small. Conclusion: In conclusion, mitral ViV and ViR using the two different procedural approaches appear to confer equal and reasonable 30-day outcomes.

Popliteal arterial thrombosis in nephrotic syndrome: a case report.

Thrombosis is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS). Though venous thromboses are common in NS, arterial thromboses are relatively rare. Commonly involved arteries include coronary, iliac, femoral, renal, cerebral, pulmonary, mesenteric, and axillary arteries, and the aorta. Arterial thromboses are associated with poor prognosis; treatment options are limited and patients may not always be amenable to treatment. We present the case of a 39-year-old female with NS who presented with thigh pain and was found to have sub-acute popliteal artery thrombosis.

Abdominal pain - learning when not to intervene!

Epiploic appendagitis (EA) is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain. It is a benign condition but may mimic other serious causes of acute abdomen such as appendicitis, diverticulitis, and gynecological emergency in severe cases. Knowledge of this condition in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain can save unnecessary hospital admission, antibiotics, and surgery. In this article, we present the case of a 43-year-old female who presented to our hospital with a 2-day history of right lower quadrant abdominal pain and diarrhea. She was diagnosed with EA with computed tomography of abdomen with contrast and was managed conservatively with good outcome.