Relative aerobic load of walking in people with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the energy demand of walking relative to aerobic capacity in people with multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. PATIENTS: A total of 45 people with multiple sclerosis (32 females), median disease duration 15 years (interquartile range (IQR) 9; 20), median Expanded Disability Status Scale 4 (min-max range: 2.0; 6.0). METHODS: Aerobic capacity, derived from a cardiopulmonary exercise test and gas exchange measurements, assessed during a 6-min overground walk test at comfortable speed, were analysed. The relative aerobic load of walking was determined as the energy demand of walking relative to oxygen uptake at peak and at the first ventilatory threshold. Healthy reference data were used for clinical inference. RESULTS: People with multiple sclerosis walk at a mean relative aerobic load of 60.0% (standard deviation 12.8%) relative to peak aerobic capacity, and 89.1% (standard deviation 19.9%) relative to the first ventilatory threshold. Fourteen participants walked above the first ventilatory threshold (31%). Peak aerobic capacity was reduced in 45% of participants, and energy demands were increased in 52% of participants. CONCLUSION: People with multiple sclerosis walk at a relative aerobic load close to their first ventilatory threshold. A high relative aerobic load can guide clinicians to improve aerobic capacity or reduce the energy demands of walking.

The relationship between energy cost of walking, ankle push-off and walking speed in persons with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The energy cost of walking (ECw) is an important indicator of walking dysfunction in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, its underlying causes and its relation with ankle push-off and walking speed are not well understood. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the contribution of ankle push-off and walking speed to increased ECw in PwMS? METHODS: Ten PwMS with walking limitations and 10 individually gender- and age-matched healthy controls (HC) were included. All participants performed two 6-min walking trials on a treadmill at comfortable walking speed (CWS of PwMS) and fast walking speed (FWS, 130 % of CWS of PwMS). Kinetics and metabolic cost were evaluated. Generalized estimating equations were performed to investigate effects of group and walking speed, and their interaction. Spearman correlations were conducted to examine whether ECw was related to ankle push-off in PwMS, controlling for differences in walking speed in PwMS. RESULTS: ECw at matched walking speed was significantly higher in PwMS compared to HC. Kinetic parameters were not different between the most impaired leg in PwMS and HC at matched walking speed, but asymmetry between both legs of PwMS was observed. At FWS, ECw reduced and ankle push-off increased similarly in both groups. ECw was inversely related to peak ankle power of the most impaired leg in PwMS at CWS. SIGNIFICANCE: Slow walking speed is one factor that contributes to increased ECw in PwMS. Furthermore, PwMS who had a higher ECw showed a lower peak ankle power, independent of walking speed. This indicates that ankle push-off could be a contributor to increased ECw.

Blood pressure change does not associate with Center of Pressure movement after postural transition in geriatric outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic hypotension (OH), a blood pressure drop after postural change, is associated with impaired standing balance and falls in older adults. This study aimed to assess the association between blood pressure (BP) and a measure of quality of standing balance, i.e. Center of Pressure (CoP) movement, after postural change from supine to standing position in geriatric outpatients, and to compare CoP movement between patients with and without OH. METHODS: In a random subgroup of 75 consecutive patients who were referred to a geriatric outpatient clinic, intermittent BP measurements were obtained simultaneously with CoP measurements in mediolateral and anterior-posterior direction directly after postural change during 3 min of quiet stance with eyes open on a force plate. Additional measurements of continuous BP were available in n = 38 patients. Associations between BP change during postural change and CoP movement were analyzed using Spearman correlation. Mann-Whitney-U tests were used to compare CoP movement between patients with OH and without OH, in which OH was defined as a BP drop exceeding 20 mmHg of systolic BP (SBP) and/or 10 mmHg of diastolic BP (DBP) within 3 min after postural change. RESULTS: OH measured intermittently was found in 8 out of 75 (11%) and OH measured continuously in 22 out of 38 patients (57.9%). BP change did not associate with CoP movement. CoP movement did not differ significantly between patients with and without OH. CONCLUSIONS: Results do not underpin the added value of CoP movement measurements in diagnosing OH in a clinical setting. Neither could we identify the role of CoP measurements in the understanding of the relation between OH and impaired standing balance.