Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ir J Med Sci ; 192(2): 693-697, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35420367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Older age groups were identified as a high-risk cohort for Covid-19 and thus were a focus of lockdown measures enacted internationally. Resultant decreased social mobility and physical activity levels are associated with sarcopenia, which may lead to increased risk of hip fracture upon resuming social integration and physical activities after easing of lockdown restrictions. AIMS: Our aim was to compare the incidence of hip fractures during the period following vaccination with subsequent relaxation of restrictions, to those prior to and during the Covid pandemic. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective cohort study was performed consisting of all patients presenting with a "hip" fracture to 3 regional trauma units over the relevant time periods in 2019, 2020 and 2021. Tallaght, Galway and Waterford University Hospitals are large academic teaching hospitals with a combined mixed urban and rural catchment of over 1 million people. FINDINGS: Four-hundred-fourteen patients in total were included in the final analysis, with 133 eligible hip fractures observed proceeding to operative treatment across the study period in 2019, 132 in 2020 and 149 in 2021, representing a 12.88% increase. Demographic data revealed similar patient cohorts with respect to age and gender, fracture pattern and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in hip fracture volume was observed during the period post vaccination with subsequent relaxation of restrictions and increased social mobility, compared to those prior to and during the Covid pandemic. These findings have implications for hospital planning and orthopaedic resourcing as we navigate our way forward past the Covid-19 Pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hip Fractures , Humans , Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hospitals, Teaching
2.
ANZ J Surg ; 92(11): 2961-2967, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35841184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant long course chemoradiotherapy (NLCRT) for rectal cancer can result in complete pathological response (pCR). In 2017, we started offering patients who had a complete clinical response (cCR), a choice between total mesorectal excision (TME) and an intensive surveillance or 'watch and wait' (W&W) program. We report the early outcomes of this prospective study. METHODS: All patients undergoing NLCRT from 2017 to 2019 were included. All patients were restaged at 8 weeks, and those who had a cCR were offered TME or W&W. RESULTS: Of 59 patients who underwent NLCRT, 55 had restaging. Eleven of these patients had a cCR (20%). Three chose to have TME and all had a pCR. Eight were enrolled in W&W. Two patients were diagnosed with local regrowth and underwent TME at 7 and 17 months after NLCRT. A further nine patients, who were surgically unfit or refused TME, and had an excellent response to NLCRT, but one that did not reach criteria for a cCR, were also managed with W&W. Of these, two patients developed regrowth with distant metastases. From 2017 to 2019, of the 17 patients who were managed with a W&W approach, 13 patients have remained regrowth free after a median of 28 (13-58) months of W&W. CONCLUSION: Preliminary findings suggest management with W&W, following cCR, may be a safe alternative to TME. There have so far been no instances of distant failure, and those with cCR that had regrowth, were identified early and successfully managed with salvage TME.


Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms , Watchful Waiting , Humans , Prospective Studies , Watchful Waiting/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy
3.
JBJS Case Connect ; 11(4)2021 10 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34669656

ABSTRACT

CASE: A 10-year-old boy presented with vague symptoms, a few days after a nondescript injury to his left knee. History, examination and blood tests, and imaging were unremarkable. Because of his severe pain, we proceeded to arthroscopy. On proceeding to arthroscopy, a wooden toothpick was found inside the knee joint. The wooden toothpick was removed arthroscopically. CONCLUSION: The physicians/surgeons have to be vigilant and should approach holistically toward history and examination of a child presenting with vague signs and symptoms.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Knee Joint , Child , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Male , Pain
5.
Cureus ; 11(7): e5226, 2019 Jul 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31565628

ABSTRACT

Thermal osteonecrosis is the in situ death of bone tissue as a result of excessively high temperatures. While the exact temperature at which thermal osteonecrosis occurs has not yet been determined, 50°C is the accepted critical value, as bone regeneration is almost completely impaired from this point on. Thermal osteonecrosis is a significant concern in orthopedic surgery, as it can compromise the bone-implant interface in fracture fixation, which, by definition, is a complication. A literature review was undertaken of the pertinent literature concerning heat generation from bone drilling and how this heat affects bone tissue. The Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and secondary (Cochrane Library) databases were searched up to December 2017 using keywords with the appropriate use of Boolean operators. Both simple text word searching and thesaurus searching were used to maximize the number of relevant articles retrieved. Reference tracking was performed via the retrieved articles to further extend the boundaries of the search. The level of evidence was Level V. It was identified that factors affecting heat generation during bone drilling were multifactorial and did not act independently of each other. Good quality evidence exists that both bone drilling parameters and the drill itself affect heat generation in bone during bone drilling. However, external irrigation is the most important variable and should always be used to keep the bone temperature below the critical value of 50°C. Future studies should focus on how the parameters of bone drilling interact with each other and how this influences heat generation in bone drilling. There is also a lack of in vivo studies on the human bone; this too should be further investigated.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...