ABSTRACT
This paper will examine how the settings in which midwives practice (the birthplace) and models of care affect midwives' decision making during the management of labour. One-hundred-and-four independent, team and hospital based midwives and 100 low obstetric risk nulliparous women to whom labour care was provided were surveyed. These midwives and women resided in the Auckland metropolitan area of New Zealand. The majority of midwives who participated worked in models of care which provided women with continuity of carer and care, however, this was not found to influence the way the midwives provided labour care. Instead, practice was found to be relatively homogenous regardless of whether the midwives worked in independent, team, or hospital-based practice. The birthplace setting in which the labour care took place did influence midwifery practice. The majority of midwives provided labour care in large obstetric hospitals and identified practices dominated by the medical model of care. Practice was described as being influenced by intervention and the need for technology, however, this did not prevent the majority of women from perceiving they were actively involved in the decision making process and that they worked in partnership with their midwives. Closer examination of the midwives' decision making processes whilst providing the labour care revealed that the midwives' individual decisions were influenced by the needs of the women rather than the hospital protocols. What became evident was that the midwives in this study had adopted a humanistic approach to care whereby technology was used alongside relationship-centred care.
Subject(s)
Birthing Centers/standards , Clinical Competence , Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Delivery, Obstetric/nursing , Midwifery/methods , Nurse's Role , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Middle Aged , Midwifery/standards , Models, Nursing , New Zealand , Nurse-Patient Relations , Nursing Evaluation Research , Nursing Methodology Research , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: to examine whether equal power is essential to the perceptions of partnership in midwifery practice and to propose an alternative model of how power might best be shared. DESIGN: a cross-sectional design was employed using the predominant methods of interview, questionnaires and thinking aloud tape recordings as triangulation of data. SETTING: two large metropolitan hospitals in Auckland, New Zealand and home birth settings. SAMPLE: Forty one independent and hospital-based midwives and 37 nulliparous women at low obstetric risk for whom labour care was provided. FINDINGS: the majority of the midwives and the women in the two studies presented believed they had achieved a midwifery partnership with little emphasis placed on the need for equality in decision making. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: the model proposed provides a framework that identifies how power can be shared without the need for equality. The integration of this model into practice may assist midwives and women to recognise and utilise differences in their experience and knowledge to achieve their aims of achieving a partnership and a successful birth.
