Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 2024 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38373708

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify predictors of immediate postpartum breastfeeding among women with maternal cardiac disease (MCD). STUDY DESIGN: This study included all gravidas with MCD who delivered at a single institution from 2012 to 2018. Charts were abstracted for maternal demographics, obstetrical outcome, cardiac diagnoses, cardiac risk stratification scores, and prepregnancy echocardiogram findings. Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the breastfeeding (BF) group versus the nonbreastfeeding (NBF) group. Logistic regression was used to obtain odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 211 gravidas with MCD, 12% were not breastfeeding at the time of postpartum hospital discharge. Compared with the BF group, the NBF group had a significantly higher proportion of women with cardiomyopathy (21% NBF vs. 7% BF, OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.12-10.71), with modified World Health Organization (WHO) classification ≥III (33 vs. 14%, OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.22-8.15), and with prepregnancy ejection fraction (EF) < 50% (55 vs. 14%, OR 7.20, 95% CI 1.92-27.06). There were otherwise no differences between the two groups with regards to other cardiac diagnoses or cardiac risk scores. CONCLUSION: In women with MCD, cardiomyopathy, modified WHO class ≥III, and a prepregnancy EF < 50% were associated with NBF in the immediate postpartum period. These findings may guide providers in identifying a subset of women with MCD who can benefit from increased breastfeeding counseling and support. KEY POINTS: · Eighty-two percent of patients with cardiac disease are breastfeeding at the time of postpartum discharge.. · Cardiomyopathy is associated with an increased odds of not breastfeeding at postpartum discharge.. · Rationale for not breastfeeding is infrequently documented in the medical record..

2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 2(4): 100195, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33345915

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of methamphetamine use in reproductive-age women across the United States is increasing. The existing literature on methamphetamine use in pregnancy has indicated an elevated risk of adverse maternal and neonatal health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate pregnancy outcomes in patients with recent methamphetamine use compared with patients who received negative test results for methamphetamine at the time of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A single-site retrospective cohort study from January to December 2015 was performed. Patients with a documented urine drug screen during the delivery encounter were identified from the electronic medical records. The outcomes of patients with methamphetamine-positive urine drug screens were compared with controls with urine drug screens negative for methamphetamine. Maternal outcomes of interest included placental abruption, hypertensive disorders, premature preterm rupture of membranes, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm birth. Utilization of prenatal care, social work consults, and child protective services referrals were also recorded. Neonatal outcomes included birthweight, neonatal intensive care unit length of stay, Apgar scores, and perinatal mortality. RESULTS: The 2 groups had similar demographic characteristics (age, multiparity, ethnicity), with the methamphetamine-positive group more likely to have no or limited prenatal care. Both groups engaged in polysubstance use. A methamphetamine-positive urine drug screen at the time of delivery carries an increased risk of abruption (odds ratio, 5.63; confidence interval, 1.21-26.21) but indicated no increased risk of maternal hypertensive disorders. Additional associated risks include preterm birth (odds ratio, 3.10; confidence interval, 1.44-6.68), lower Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes (P=.012 and P=.02, respectively), and increased perinatal mortality (odds ratio, 6.9; confidence interval, 1.01-47.4). CONCLUSION: Positive urine drug testing for methamphetamines during labor admission confers considerable maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality including an increased risk of placental abruption, preterm birth, and perinatal demise. Given the limited treatments for methamphetamine addiction, further research is urgently needed.


Subject(s)
Methamphetamine , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Premature Birth , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Methamphetamine/adverse effects , Placenta , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/chemically induced , Retrospective Studies , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...