Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 59(3): 1441-5, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25534724

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile infection causes diarrheal disease with potentially fatal complications. Although treatments are available, including vancomycin, metronidazole, and fidaxomicin, the recurrence of disease after therapy remains a problem. LFF571 is a novel thiopeptide antibacterial that shows in vitro potency against C. difficile that is comparable to or greater than that of other clinically used antibiotics. Here, we compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LFF571 and vancomycin in patients with C. difficile infection as part of an early efficacy study. This multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blind, and active-controlled study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of LFF571 in adults with primary episodes or first relapses of moderate C. difficile infections. Patients were randomized to receive 200 mg of LFF571 or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily for 10 days. The PK parameters were calculated from drug concentrations measured in serum and fecal samples. The systemic exposure following oral administration of 200 mg of LFF571 four times per day for 10 days in patients with C. difficile infection was limited. The highest LFF571 serum concentration observed was 41.7 ng/ml, whereas the levels in feces at the end of treatment were between 107 and 12,900 µg/g. In comparison, the peak vancomycin level observed in serum was considerably higher, at 2.73 µg/ml; the levels of vancomycin in feces were not measured. Similar to healthy volunteers, patients with C. difficile infections exhibited high fecal concentrations and low serum levels of LFF571. These results are consistent with the retention of LFF571 in the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01232595.).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Thiazoles/pharmacokinetics , Vancomycin/pharmacokinetics , Feces/chemistry , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 54(11): 1263-71, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24788408

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the drug-drug interaction between pasireotide SC and verapamil, a known P-glycoprotein inhibitor. Subjects received pasireotide SC (single dose, 600 µg) on day 1, and samples for pharmacokinetics evaluation were collected from days 1 to 8. Subjects received an oral dose of verapamil 240 mg/d for 10 days (days 15-24). On day 18, subjects also received pasireotide SC 600 µg. Pharmacokinetic sampling for pasireotide SC and verapamil was done during days 18 to 25 and days 15 to 21, respectively. Safety evaluations were performed throughout the study period, including a 30-day post-treatment follow-up. Pharmacokinetic profiles of pasireotide SC alone and in combination with verapamil sustained-release (SR) were superimposable with the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.98 (0.91-1.06) for C(max), 0.97 (0.90-1.04) for AUC(last), and 0.98 (0.92-1.05) for AUC(inf). Exploratory analyses showed a 17% (90% CI, 0.72-0.94) reduction in C(trough) and 31% (0.58-0.82) reduction in C(max) (8 hours post-dose) for verapamil SR with pasireotide SC versus verapamil alone. Pasireotide SC with or without verapamil was well tolerated. In conclusion, there was no change in the rate of pasireotide absorption and elimination or extent of exposure following concomitant administration with verapamil.


Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacokinetics , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Verapamil/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Drug Interactions , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Somatostatin/administration & dosage , Somatostatin/adverse effects , Somatostatin/pharmacokinetics , Verapamil/administration & dosage , Verapamil/adverse effects
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 56(11): 5946-51, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22964250

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of hospital-acquired infectious diarrhea. LFF571 is a novel inhibitor of the prokaryotic translation elongation factor Tu and is active against a range of bacterial species, including C. difficile. This first-in-human study investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending oral doses of LFF571 in healthy subjects. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Except for one cohort, LFF571 was given with a high-fat meal to all single-dose cohorts (25 mg, 100 mg, 400 mg, and 1,000 mg). In the multiple-dose cohorts (25 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg every 6 h for 10 days), LFF571 was given without regard to food. A total of 56 subjects completed the study, with 32 and 25 receiving single and multiple doses, respectively. There were no deaths, no serious adverse events, and no subject withdrawals due to an adverse event. The most common adverse event was diarrhea; gastrointestinal pain or distension was also noted. Diarrhea did not develop more frequently among subjects who received LFF571 than among those who received a placebo. LFF571 had limited systemic exposure and high steady-state fecal concentrations. The highest concentration of LFF571 in serum (3.2 ng/ml) was observed after the last dose in a subject who received 200 mg every 6 h for 10 days. LFF571 was generally safe and well tolerated in single and multiple oral doses in healthy subjects. The minimal serum and high fecal concentrations support the further development of LFF571 for the treatment of C. difficile infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Drug Monitoring , Thiazoles/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/blood , Area Under Curve , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Dosage Calculations , Feces/chemistry , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos , Thiazoles/blood
4.
Pharmacotherapy ; 30(11): 1097-108, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20973683

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the contribution of polymorphisms in the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase gene (UGT) and the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 gene (ABCC2) to mycophenolic acid (MPA) pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes in thoracic transplant recipients. DESIGN: Open-label, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Transplant clinic in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. PATIENTS: Sixty-eight thoracic (36 lung, 32 heart) transplant recipients who were receiving steady-state oral mycophenolate mofetil. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eleven blood samples were obtained from each patient over a 12-hour dosing period. Plasma concentrations of MPA (active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil), the MPA metabolites 7-Omycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG) and acyl glucuronide (AcMPAG), and free MPA were measured, and dose-normalized conventional pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods. Genetic polymorphisms in UGT and ABCC2 were determined by sequencing, and their contributions to pharmacokinetic variability were investigated by using multivariate analysis. For both the lung and heart transplant groups, the UGT2B7 variant 802T (Tyr(268) or UGT2B7*2, rs7439366) and the UGT2B7 variant -138A modified AcMPAG exposure (2.5-3.7-fold and 9.3-12.3-fold higher AcMPAG area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] and AcMPAG:MPA ratio, respectively). In an exploratory analysis, occurrences of rejection, infection, anemia, and leukopenia were associated with an AcMPAG AUC greater than 50 µg·hour/ml and an AcMPAG:MPA ratio greater than 2. CONCLUSION: UGT2B7 is a promising gene candidate that may influence MPA pharmacokinetics clinically; however, larger clinical pharmacogenetic studies in thoracic transplant subpopulations are warranted to corroborate the role of AcMPAG and UGT2B7 variants in optimizing mycophenolate mofetil therapy.


Subject(s)
Glucuronosyltransferase/genetics , Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins/genetics , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Area Under Curve , British Columbia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Heart Transplantation/methods , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lung Transplantation/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2 , Multivariate Analysis , Mycophenolic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Pharmacogenetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Ther Drug Monit ; 32(3): 373-8, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20357699

ABSTRACT

Given the paucity of data on pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in islet transplant, the aim of this study was to characterize pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA and its 2 glucuronidated metabolites in stable islet transplant recipients. Sixteen subjects were entered into this open-label study after written informed consent. Upon administration of a steady-state morning mycophenolate mofetil dose, 12-hour serial concentrations of MPA and its phenolic glucuronide (MPAG) and acyl-glucuronide (AcMPAG) were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method and pharmacokinetic parameters analyzed by noncompartmental modeling. Subjects included 11 women and 5 men who had received 2.7 +/- 0.8 islet transplants. Age was 50 +/- 8 years, weight 64 +/- 11 kg, serum albumin 4.2 +/- 0.3 g/dL, and serum creatinine 1.1 +/- 0.4 mg/dL. All patients were also on tacrolimus-based steroid-free immunosuppressant regimens. Mycophenolate mofetil dosage ranged from 1 to 2 g daily (25.4 +/- 6.1 mg/kg/d). Pharmacokinetic parameters for MPA were area under the curve 42.9 +/- 21.6 microg h/mL; dose-normalized AUC 52.9 +/- 25.4 microg h/mL/g; maximal concentration (Cmax) 13.0 +/- 6.2 microg/mL; time to Cmax (tmax) 1.2 +/- 0.4 hours; minimum concentration (Cmin) 1.4 +/- 1.0 microg/mL; and MPA-free fraction 1.2% +/- 1.0%. Area under the curve ratios of MPAG/MPA and AcMPAG/MPA were 17.8 +/- 12.4 and 0.1 +/- 0.1, respectively. The wide interpatient variability in all pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA and metabolites are consistent with results from the only other published pharmacokinetic study in islet transplant recipients. A population model and a search for significant covariates may help reduce this variability. Pharmacokinetic parameters calculated in the present study, coupled with findings from the only other published MPA study in islet transplant, form a preliminary base on which to build a population model for future multicenter studies of this little-studied transplant subpopulation.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/immunology , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Mycophenolic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Cyclosporine/metabolism , Cyclosporine/pharmacokinetics , Female , Glucuronides , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/metabolism , Male , Mycophenolic Acid/metabolism , Young Adult
6.
Ann Pharmacother ; 44(1): 19-27, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19996322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil is widely used in islet transplant recipients and its active metabolite, mycophenolic acid (MPA), exhibits wide pharmacokinetic variability. However, to our knowledge, no limited sampling strategy (LSS) exists for monitoring MPA in this subpopulation. OBJECTIVE: To define optimal LSSs for MPA monitoring and to test their predictive performance in islet transplant recipients. METHODS: After written informed consent was obtained and upon administration of a steady-state morning mycophenolate mofetil dose, blood samples were collected at 0, 0.3, 0.6, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours from 16 stable islet transplant recipients. MPA concentrations were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection and pharmacokinetic parameters analyzed by noncompartmental modeling. All 16 patients' profiles were used to develop the LSSs via multiple regression analysis. Potential LSSs were restricted to ones having R(2) 0.90 or greater and 3 or fewer time points within the first 4 hours postdose. Resulting equations were validated for their predictive performance using the jackknife method, with acceptable criteria for bias and precision preset to within +/-15%. In addition, 14 published LSSs (in the renal transplant population) were tested in our islet transplant patients. RESULTS: Five LSSs met preset criteria and had conventional sampling times: AUC = 1.783 + 1.248C1 + 0.888C2 + 8.027C4 (R2 = 0.98, bias = -3.09%, precision = 9.53%) AUC = 2.778 + 1.413C1 + 0.963C3 + 7.511C4 (R2 = 0.97, bias = -3.22%, precision = 11.02%) AUC = 1.448 + 1.239C1 + 0.271C1.5 + 9.108 C4 (R2 = 0.96, bias = -1.90%, precision = 11.46) AUC = 1.410 - 0.259C0 + 1.443C1 + 9.622C4 (R2 = 0.96, bias = -2.68%, precision = 11.53%) AUC = 1.547 + 1.417C1 + 9.448C4 (R2 = 0.96, bias = -2.46%, precision = 11.14%) where AUC = area under the concentration-time curve. None of the other published LSSs in the renal transplant population met the preset criteria for bias and precision. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, these are the first precise and accurate LSSs for predicting MPA AUC developed specifically for islet transplant recipients. The LSS that we recommend is the one utilizing 2 concentrations: AUC = 1.547 + 1.417C1 + 9.448C4. This equation is convenient and clinically feasible. Other islet transplant centers may wish to validate our equation in their population or use our template as a guide to develop accurate and precise LSSs specific to their patient population.


Subject(s)
Blood Specimen Collection , Drug Monitoring/methods , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation , Mycophenolic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Aged , Area Under Curve , Enzyme Inhibitors/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mycophenolic Acid/blood
7.
Ann Pharmacother ; 42(7): 1037-47, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18594053

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review the current clinical evidence on the effects of corticosteroid interactions with the immunosuppressive drugs cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and sirolimus. DATA SOURCES: Articles were retrieved through MEDLINE (1966-February 2008) using the terms corticosteroids, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, sirolimus, drug interactions, CYP3A4, P-glycoprotein, and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Bibliographies were manually searched for additional relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language studies dealing with drug interactions between corticosteroids and cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and sirolimus were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Corticosteroids share common metabolic and transporter pathways, the cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1) systems, respectively, with cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus. As a group, corticosteroids induce the CYP3A4 and P-gp pathways; however, a few exceptions exist and the impact on a patient's immunosuppressant regimen may be critical. Corticosteroids also have demonstrated an induction effect on the uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 involved in mycophenolate's disposition. Successful corticosteroid withdrawal regimens have been reported; however, only few studies have examined the effects of steroid withdrawal on the remaining immunosuppressive regimens. To date, the clinical impact of steroid withdrawal on disposition of other immunosuppressive agents is not well characterized, and reports of such drug-drug interactions are conflicting. CONCLUSIONS: While our understanding of the clinical impact of steroid-immunosuppressant interactions is limited, it remains a fact that corticosteroids have complex induction and inhibition interactions with common metabolic and transport pathways. Given the complex interaction of corticosteroids on crucial metabolic enzymes and transporter proteins, monitoring of immunosuppressive agents during steroid withdrawal is warranted to ensure optimal treatment outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/pharmacology , Cyclosporine/pharmacokinetics , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Sirolimus/pharmacokinetics , Tacrolimus/pharmacokinetics , Drug Interactions , Humans , Mycophenolic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Transplantation
8.
Ther Drug Monit ; 30(3): 282-91, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18520599

ABSTRACT

Mycophenolate mofetil is an immunosuppressant commonly used in solid organ transplantation. Its active metabolite, mycophenolic acid (MPA), is metabolized to the inactive 7-O-mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG) and the active acyl glucuronide (AcMPAG). Most pharmacokinetic (PK) studies have been focused on MPA, but not its metabolites, in kidney transplant recipients. Pharmacokinetic studies of MPA and its metabolites in thoracic transplant recipients are scarce. Because neither the heart nor lung is involved in MPA metabolism or excretion, the thoracic transplant population may exhibit unique PKs. This open-label study aimed to characterize and compare PKs of MPA and its metabolites in stable lung or heart transplant recipients. Fifty thoracic (27 lung, 23 heart) transplant recipients were recruited. Subjects were also taking cyclosporine (11 lung, 14 heart) or tacrolimus (16 lung, nine heart), and prednisone (27 lung, one heart). Blood samples were obtained at 0, 20, 40, 60, and 90 minutes and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours postdose. Plasma was used for drug level analysis (MPA, MPAG, and AcMPAG) by a high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection method; in a subset of subjects, free MPA concentrations were also determined. Conventional PK parameters (dose-normalized) were determined by noncompartmental methods. There was wide interpatient variability of MPA, MPAG, and AcMPAG PKs with coefficients of variation exceeding 70% for most PK parameters measured. Other findings (P < 0.05) included: lower MPA area under the curve, maximum concentration, and minimum concentration; higher apparent clearance and MPAG/MPA metabolic ratio in the lung versus heart transplant group; lower MPA area under the curve and minimum concentration, and higher apparent clearance and MPAG/MPA metabolic ratio in lung transplant recipients concurrently taking cyclosporine versus tacrolimus; and lower minimum concentration in heart transplant recipients taking cyclosporine versus tacrolimus. Despite large interpatient variability in the PKs of MPA, MPAG, and AcMPAG among thoracic transplant recipients, there appear to be significant differences between lung and heart patients, which warrant further study.


Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation/physiology , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Lung Transplantation/physiology , Mycophenolic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Acylation , Adult , Aged , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Cyclosporine/pharmacokinetics , Cyclosporine/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Interactions , Female , Glucuronides/metabolism , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Mycophenolic Acid/blood , Phenols/metabolism , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet , Tacrolimus/pharmacokinetics , Tacrolimus/pharmacology
9.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 27(3): 325-8, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18342756

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Eight limited sampling strategies (LSSs) for estimating mycophenolic acid area under the concentration-time curve (4 developed from lung transplant recipients at our center, 4 developed for heart transplant recipients from other research groups) were evaluated in 27 heart or heart-kidney transplant patients. RESULTS: The LSSs from our lung transplant patients performed well when applied to the heart transplant population, with percent bias and percent precision within the acceptable limit of +/-15%. CONCLUSIONS: The LSSs developed at our center are robust enough to be applied to both lung and heart transplant populations. Application of LSSs from other research groups yielded less optimal results, reinforcing the need to re-establish or re-validate LSSs for each specific center.


Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Lung Transplantation/immunology , Mycophenolic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Area Under Curve , Biological Availability , Female , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/blood , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Mycophenolic Acid/blood , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Predictive Value of Tests , Sampling Studies
10.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 46(6): 471-94, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17518507

ABSTRACT

Despite evidence in the literature suggesting that a strong correlation exists between the pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic effect of anticancer agents, many of these agents are still dosed by body surface area. Therapeutic drug monitoring with the aim of pharmacokinetic-guided dosing would not only maintain target concentrations associated with efficacy but may potentially minimise the likelihood of dose-related systemic toxicities. The pharmacokinetic parameter that displays the best correlation with the pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). However, accurate determination of the AUC requires numerous blood samples over an extended interval, which is not feasible in clinical practice. Therefore, limited sampling strategies (LSSs) have been proposed as a means to accurately and precisely estimate pharmacokinetic parameters with a minimal number of blood samples. LSSs have been developed for many drugs, particularly ciclosporin and other immunosuppressants, as well as for certain anticancer drugs. This systematic review evaluates LSSs developed for the platinum compounds and categorises 18 pertinent citations according to criteria adapted from the US Preventive Services Task Force. Thirteen citations (four level I, six level II-1, three level II-2) pertained to LSSs for carboplatin, four citations (one level II-1, one level II-2, two level III) to cisplatin LSSs, and one citation (level II-2) to nedaplatin. Based on the current evidence, it appears that LSSs may be useful for pharmacokinetic-guided dosage adjustments of carboplatin in both adults and children with cancer. Although some validation studies suggest that LSSs can be extended to different cancer populations or different chemotherapy regimens, other studies dispute this finding. Although the use of LSSs to predict the pharmacokinetic parameters of cisplatin and nedaplatin appear promising, the quality of evidence from published studies does not support routine implementation at this time.LSSs represent one approach in which clinicians can make specific dosage adjustments for individual patients to optimise outcomes. However, the limitations of these strategies must also be taken into consideration. There is also a need for prospective studies to demonstrate that application of LSSs for platinum agents ultimately improves patient response and decreases systemic toxicities.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Carboplatin/pharmacokinetics , Cisplatin/pharmacokinetics , Drug Monitoring/methods , Organoplatinum Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Area Under Curve , Bayes Theorem , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Child , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Female , Hematologic Tests , Humans , Male , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Regression Analysis
12.
Pharmacotherapy ; 26(9): 1232-40, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16945044

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop limited sampling strategies for estimation of mycophenolic acid exposure (by determining area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) in lung transplant recipients by using sampling times within 2 hours after drug administration and a maximum of three plasma samples. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label clinical study. SETTING: Lung transplant clinic in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. PATIENTS: Nineteen adult (mean age 48.3 yrs) lung transplant recipients who were receiving mycophenolate mofetil therapy along with cyclosporine (9 patients) or tacrolimus (10 patients). INTERVENTION: Eleven blood samples were collected from each of the 19 patients over 12 hours: immediately before (0 hr) and 0.3, 0.6, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after administration of mycophenolate mofetil. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mycophenolic acid levels in plasma were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection method. The 19 patients were randomly divided into index (10 patients) and validation (9 patients) groups. Limited sampling strategies were developed with multiple regression analysis by using data from the index group. Data from the validation group were used to test each strategy. Bias and precision of each limited sampling strategy were determined by calculating the mean prediction error and the root mean square error, respectively. The correlation between AUC and single concentrations was generally poor (r2= 0.18-0.73). Two single-concentration strategies, eight two-concentration strategies, and eight three-concentration strategies matched our criteria. However, the best overall limited sampling strategies (and their predictive performance) were the following: log AUC = 0.241 log C0 + 0.406 log C2 + 1.140 (bias -5.82%, precision 5.97%, r2= 0.828) and log AUC = 0.202 log C0 + 0.411 log C1.5 + 1.09 (bias -5.71%, precision 6.94%, r2= 0.791), where Cx is mycophenolic acid concentration at time x hours. CONCLUSION: Two-concentration limited sampling strategies provided minimally biased and highly precise estimation of mycophenolic acid AUC in lung transplant recipients. These optimal and most clinically feasible limited sampling strategies are based collectively on the number of blood samples required, r2 value, bias, and precision.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Lung Transplantation , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Mycophenolic Acid/blood , Adult , Area Under Curve , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Mycophenolic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use
13.
Ann Pharmacother ; 40(9): 1509-16, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16882870

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil, an immunosuppressive agent commonly used in solid organ transplantation. MPA is metabolized to the inactive metabolite 7-O-mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG) and the active metabolite acyl glucuronide (AcMPAG). Pharmacokinetic profiling of MPA by determining AUC is a tool for determining drug exposure. Many studies, conducted primarily in kidney and some heart and liver transplant recipients, have shown wide interpatient variability in MPA's pharmacokinetic parameters. There have been few studies in the lung transplant group and, even though the lung is not involved in drug elimination, these patients may have different MPA pharmacokinetic characteristics. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters and metabolic ratios of MPA in stable adult lung transplant recipients. METHODS: In an open-label manner, lung transplant recipients were recruited. Blood samples were obtained at 0, 0.3, 0.6, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours postdose. Plasma was separated and acidified for drug concentration analysis (MPA, MPAG, AcMPAG) by an HPLC-ultraviolet detection method. Conventional pharmacokinetic parameters were determined via noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: There was large interpatient variability in all pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA, MPAG, and AcMPAG. Similar variability was observed after stratifying patients into concomitant medication groups: cyclosporine and tacrolimus. There was a trend for the tacrolimus group to have a higher dose-normalized AUC, higher AUC, lower apparent clearance, and lower AUC ratio of AcMPAG/MPA compared with the cyclosporine group. In addition, the cyclosporine group had a lower minimum concentration and higher AUC ratio of MPAG/MPA than did the tacrolimus group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the large interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA, MPAG, and AcMPAG, therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA and its metabolites in lung transplant recipients may be beneficial.


Subject(s)
Glucuronides/blood , Glucuronides/pharmacokinetics , Lung Transplantation , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Mycophenolic Acid/blood , Mycophenolic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
14.
Ther Drug Monit ; 28(3): 419-30, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16778729

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic drug monitoring has gained much attention in the management of immunosuppressive therapy. Area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) is the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter most commonly used to assess total exposure to a drug. However, estimation of AUC requires multiple blood samples throughout the dosing period, which is often inconvenient and expensive. Limited sampling strategies (LSSs) are therefore developed to estimate AUC and other PK parameters accurately and precisely while minimizing the number of blood samples needed. This greatly reduces costs, labor and inconvenience for both patients and clinical staff. In the therapeutic management of solid organ transplantation, LSSs for cyclosporine are commonplace and have been extensively reviewed. Thus, this systematic review paper focuses on other immunosuppressive agents and categorizes the 24 pertinent citations according to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force rating scale. Thirteen articles (3 level I, 1 level II-1, 2 level II-2, and 7 level III) involved LSSs for mycophenolate, 7 citations (1 level I and 6 level III) for tacrolimus (TAC), and 3 citations (all level III) for other drugs (sirolimus) or multiple drugs. The 2 main approaches to establishing LSSs, multiple regression and Bayesian analyses, are also reviewed. Important elements to consider for future LSS studies, including proper validation of LSSs, convenient sampling times, and application of LSSs to the appropriate patient population and drug formulation are discussed. Limited sampling strategies are a useful tool to help clinicians make decisions on drug therapy. However, patients' pathophysiology, environmental and genetic factors, and pharmacologic response to therapy, in conjunction with PK profiling tools such as LSSs, should be considered collectively for optimal therapy management.


Subject(s)
Cyclosporine/blood , Drug Monitoring/methods , Immunosuppressive Agents/blood , Mycophenolic Acid/blood , Tacrolimus/blood , Area Under Curve , Bayes Theorem , Cyclosporine/pharmacokinetics , Drug Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Models, Biological , Mycophenolic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Tacrolimus/pharmacokinetics
16.
J Infect Dis ; 188(4): 541-8, 2003 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12898441

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to examine the relationship between untimed antiretroviral concentrations measured in plasma samples collected for virus-load testing and response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. Plasma nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase-inhibitor and protease-inhibitor concentrations were retrospectively measured in all virus-load plasma samples collected during the first year of therapy, for 122 patients in British Columbia, Canada, who initiated therapy between August 1996 and September 1999 and who had CD4 counts <50 cells/micro L. Drug levels were designated a priori as "low" if the concentrations were below the published Ctrough-SD. A single low drug level measured shortly after initiation of therapy (median, 6 weeks) is common (30%) and is predictive of both more-rapid immunological failure (P=.06) and failure to achieve virologic success during the first year of therapy (P=.01). These results may reflect incomplete adherence, since a strong association (P<.001) was found between low drug levels and an imperfect prescription-refill record (<95%).


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/blood , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , HIV Infections/mortality , HIV-1 , Humans , Male , Patient Compliance , Treatment Outcome , Viral Load
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...