Pulmonary tularaemia: all that looks like cancer is not necessarily cancer - case report of four consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary tularaemia is a very rare disease with only a small number of cases described in the literature. So far, to our knowledge, there exists no case report of pulmonary tularaemia where PET-CT scans and follow up CT scans are available. CASE PRESENTATION: We present four consecutive cases of pulmonary tularaemia. All patients suffered from non-specific symptoms. All patients were referred to our institution with strong suspicions of malignancy, particularly lung cancer. Diagnosis of tularaemia was made by typical findings in the aspirate of EBUS guided fine needle aspiration (necrosis, epithelioid cell aggregation) and surgical biopsy respectively, and a positive serology. In three of the four cases, the diagnosis was confirmed by positive PCR results of the tissue. PET-CT scans obtained in all four cases were indistinguishable from lesions typically seen in patients suffering from lung cancer. One of the four patients suffered from recurrence of the disease after antibiotic treatment; also this patient finally recovered after initiation of a second antibiotic regimen. One case became asymptomatic spontaneously, but this patient still received an antibiotic treatment. In one case, a follow up CT scan was unchanged compared to the initial PET-CT scan; in all other cases, the lesions disappeared almost completely. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of patients suffering from pulmonary tularaemia are non-specific and can be of prolonged character. PET-CT scans in these cases are indistinguishable from lung cancer. The diagnosis can be established when typical findings in EBUS guided fine needle aspirates or surgical biopsies are found in combination with a positive serology. In most cases the lesions disappear in follow up CT scans after clinically successful treatment.

Pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza virus vaccination in lung transplant recipients: coverage, safety and clinical effectiveness in the Zurich cohort.

BACKGROUND: Pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza virus (H1N1) infection is considered harmful to lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Vaccination against this virus is recommended for LTRs, but little is known about associated benefits and risks. Our aim in this study is to document the safety and clinical effectiveness of the H1N1 vaccine in LTRs. METHODS: All LTRs received an informational letter on the H1N1 pandemic that included hygiene and vaccination recommendations. After completing a questionnaire, volunteering LTRs received Pandemrix (H1N1 2009 Monovalent AS03-Adjuvanted Vaccine; GSK). Adverse events (AEs) were documented at short-term follow-up visits and by telephone. Any flu-like symptoms were reported and a low threshold for performing nasal/pharyngeal swabs for virus detection was maintained. RESULTS: Of 168 eligible LTRs (107 already vaccinated for 2009 seasonal influenza), 148 (88%) received at least one vaccination with the H1N1 vaccine and 115 received a second dose. After the first vaccination, 44% had no AEs. Six self-limiting, severe AEs occurred, and the remainder were minor to moderate, predominantly injection-site reactions. After the second vaccination, AEs were clearly less frequent. All AEs resolved completely. Documented H1N1 infection occurred in 2 of 148 vaccinated LTRs, in contrast to 5 infections in 20 non-vaccinated LTRs. CONCLUSIONS: H1N1 vaccination is generally well tolerated with mild to moderate, predominantly local AEs in most LTRs and few self-limiting severe events. Clinical effectiveness is good.