Radioguided localisation of impalpable breast lesions using 99m-Technetium macroaggregated albumin: Lessons learnt during introduction of a new technique to guide preoperative localisation.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative wire-guided localisation (WGL) of impalpable breast lesions is widely used but can be technically difficult. Risks include wire migration, inaccurate placement, and inadequate surgical margins. Research shows that radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) is quicker, easier, and can improve surgical and cosmetic outcomes. An audited introduction of ROLL was conducted to validate the technique as a feasible alternative to WGL. METHODS: Fifty patients with single impalpable lesions and biopsy proven malignancy or indeterminate histology underwent WGL followed by intralesional radiopharmaceutical injection of 99m-Technetium macroaggregated albumin. Postprocedural mammography was performed to demonstrate wire position, and scintigraphy to evaluate radiopharmaceutical migration. Lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative sentinel node biopsy were performed if indicated, followed by lesion localisation and excision using a gamma probe. Specimen imaging was performed, with immediate reexcision for visibly inadequate margins. RESULTS: Accurate localisation was achieved in 86% of patients with ROLL compared to 72% with WGL. All lesions were successfully removed, with clear margins in 71.8% of malignant lesions. Reexcision and intraoperative sentinel node localisation rates were equivalent to preaudit figures for WGL. ROLL was easy to perform and problems were infrequent. Inaccurate radiopharmaceutical placement necessitating WGL occurred in four patients. Minor radiopharmaceutical migration was common, but precluded using ROLL in only two cases. CONCLUSIONS: ROLL is effective, simple, inexpensive, and easily learnt; however, preoperative confirmation of correct radiopharmaceutical placement using mammography and the gamma probe is important to help ensure successful lesion removal. Insertion of a backup hookwire is recommended during the initial introduction of ROLL.

Rates for mastectomy are lower in women attending a breast-screening programme.

BACKGROUND: Mammographic screening for breast cancer facilitates earlier recognition of lesions, thus potentially allowing for breast-conserving surgery. Few studies have compared the final surgical outcomes of women presenting through breast screening programmes with those presenting via other sources. Are breast cancer patients presenting through BreastScreen more likely to undergo breast-conserving surgery than those presenting from other sources? METHODS: Using the Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) Multidisciplinary Breast Service Database, the final surgical outcomes were reviewed for 723 women treated for breast cancer at RPH between January 2000 and August 2002. During this period, 397 patients were referred to the RPH Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic from BreastScreen WA, and 326 were referred from other sources. RESULTS: Of all patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer, 58% in the screen group and 36% in the non-screen group had breast-conserving surgery (P < 0.0001). When surgical outcomes for women in the BreastScreen target age range of 50-69 years were analysed, 59.5% in the screen group and 42.3% in the non-screen group had breast-conserving surgery (P < 0.001). Patient choice was second only to disease extent as a factor determining the outcome of mastectomy. In both cohorts, more than 40% of patients who underwent re-excisional surgery for positive margins, after initial breast-conserving surgery, had residual invasive or in situ disease present. CONCLUSIONS: At RPH, BreastScreen patients were more likely to undergo breast-conserving surgery than those who presented from other sources. A significant proportion of women with positive margins after initial breast-conserving surgery had residual in situ or invasive disease. Re-excision for positive margins was thus warranted.