Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arthrosc Tech ; 11(3): e301-e306, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35256967

ABSTRACT

Treatment options for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears continue to evolve. Recently bursal acromial reconstruction (BAR) has been described as an additional option to reduce pain and improve comfort. As originally described, an acellular dermal allograft is secured to the underside of the acromion as an interposition graft. We describe a modified technique that facilitates suture passage, reduces entanglement, and optimizes contact between the bone-graft interface.

2.
Arthrosc Tech ; 10(9): e2121-e2125, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34504751

ABSTRACT

The middle glenohumeral ligament (MGHL) is well recognized as a primary stabilizer of the shoulder. Its role in shoulder pathologies such as adhesive capsulitis, subscapularis tendon tear, and glenohumeral arthritis is less understood. Biomechanically, the MGHL plays an important role in range of motion, specifically involving normal and pathologic external rotation in less than 45° of abduction. In this Technical Note, we present a technique for arthroscopic release of the MGHL in the setting of a stable shoulder with preoperative loss of external rotation and a patient at risk for postoperative restriction of external rotation.

3.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 28(9): e395-e400, 2020 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31436752

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C) is validated for assessing the impact of foot and ankle conditions in pediatric patients. The purpose of this cross-sectional study is to assess child-parent concordance and identify patient factors that predict improved agreement. METHODS: Patients aged 8 to 16 years with foot and ankle conditions and their parents completed the OxAFQ-C during routine clinic visits over a 9-month period. Demographic and medical information was collected by chart reviews. Responses in each domain were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the comparisons of responses by sex were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Concordance was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: There were 87 child-parent dyads with 50 female patients (57.5%) and 37 male patients (42.5%). Most parent responders were mothers (84%). The mean patient age was 12.4 (±2.2) years. The most common diagnosis was pes planus (17%). Child scores were significantly higher than their parents' in the school and play (P = 0.008) and emotional (P = 0.001) domains. When stratified by age, children younger than 13 years had significantly higher scores than their parents across all domains (P = 0.015 physical, 0.002 school and play, 0.001 emotional), although the concordance for the school and play and emotional domains was only moderate (0.73 and 0.58, respectively). Female patients and their parents reported significantly lower scores compared with their male counterparts only in the emotional domain (84.37 vs 93.75, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Concordance is good between child and parent scores of the OxAFQ-C for assessing the impact of foot and ankle conditions. When stratified by age, patients younger than 13 years of age had higher scores than their parents' in all domains with the lowest concordance for the school and play and emotional domains. Female patients and their parents reported significantly lower scores than their male counterparts in the emotional domain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.


Subject(s)
Ankle/physiopathology , Foot Deformities/physiopathology , Foot/physiopathology , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Parents , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Int J Sports Phys Ther ; 14(5): 724-730, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31598410

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Assessing readiness of return to sport after procedures such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a complex process, complicated by the pressures that athletes face in returning to sport as quickly as possible. Advances in motion analysis have been able to demonstrate movements that are risk factors for initial ACL injury and subsequent reinjury after reconstruction. An inexpensive, objective measure is needed to determine when athletes are ready to return to sport after ACL reconstruction. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of a single camera, markerless motion capture technology to 3D motion capture during lower extremity movements that pose as risk factors for ACL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cross Sectional Study. METHODS: This study assessed the validity of the Microsoft Kinect™ against an established 3-dimensional motion analysis system in 20 healthy subjects. Knee kinematics were assessed during impact activity in the coronal and sagittal plane specifically evaluating peak knee valgus and peak knee flexion during single leg hop and jump from box exercises. Intraclass correlation coefficients and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were determined for each kinematic variable. RESULTS: For the single leg hop, the mean absolute difference in the sagittal plane was 10.4 ° (95% LoA [-11.7 °, 26.8 °]), and in the frontal plane was 5.31 ° (95% LoA [-8 °, 13.9 °]). Similarly, for the jump from box landing on one leg, there was a difference of 7.96 ° (95% LoA [-17.7 °, 21.3 °]) and 4.69 ° (95% LoA [-6.3 °, 12.6 °]) respectively. For the jump from box, two-foot land, turn and pivot, the mean absolute difference between the systems was 7.39 ° (95% LoA [-17.8 °, 19.7 °]) in the sagittal and 4.22 ° (95% LoA [-5.9 °, 11.6 °]) in the frontal plane respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients for each activity ranged from 0.553 to 0.759. CONCLUSION: The results from the Microsoft Kinect™ were found to be in poor agreement with those from a standard motion capture system. Measuring complex lower extremity movements with the Microsoft Kinect™ does not provide adequate enough information to use as an assessment tool for injury risk and return to sport timing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...