Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Caspian J Intern Med ; 12(4): 580-585, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34820066

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Septic shock is a critical medical condition and immediate intervention is required as well as hemodynamic stability using fluid and vasopressor. Direct relationship between changes in ETco2 and changes in the cardiac output. We evaluated the study by comparing the effect of using norepinephrine or dopamine on ETco2 of patients with septic shock. METHODS: A clinical trial study was performed on 138 patients with primary diagnosis of septic shock. 70 patients received norepinephrine and 68 patients received dopamine. Patients' end tidal carbon dioxide (ETco2), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse rate (PR), arterial blood gas (ABG) levels in two groups were measured and compared at baseline and after 30 and 120 minutes after inotrope infusion. Variables were compared by means of an unpaired student t-test, an unadjusted chi-square test. RESULTS: 138 patients, 70 treated with norepinephrine infusion and 68 with dopamine infusion were included in the study. ETco2 level significantly increased within 120 minutes of treatment in the norepinephrine group (31.10±9.65) compared to the dopamine group (23.71±9.66) (P=0.001). MAP significantly decreased in the group of norepinephrine 30 minutes after treatment (71.71±20.460) (P=0.014) and pulse rate also significantly decreased in the norepinephrine group compared to the dopamine group in 30 minutes (98.07±10.63 vs 106.43±13.54) and 120 minutes (91.15±6.18 vs 103.51±2057) after treatment (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Tissue perfusion and fluid responsiveness of the shock in the norepinephrine group showed improvement. Using ETco2 as a measure for determining volume assessment in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation by septic shock is applicable.

2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(3): 549-553, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31155169

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Kidney stones are a fairly common problem that manifests itself as symptoms of acute abdominal and flank pains in patients presenting to emergency departments. OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to compare the analgesic effect of intravenous fentanyl with that of intranasal ketamine in renal colic patients. METHODS: One mg/kg of intranasal ketamine was administered in the first group, and one µg/kg of intravenous fentanyl in the second group. The pain severity was measured in the patients in terms of a visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the beginning of the study and at minutes 5, 15 and 30, and the medication side-effects were evaluated and recorded. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were ultimately assessed in two groups of 65. In the ketamine group, the mean severity of pain was 8.72 ±â€¯1.52 at the beginning of the study (P < 0.001), 5.5 ±â€¯2.97 at minute 5 (P < 0.001), 3.38 ±â€¯3.35 at minute 15 (P = 0.004) and 2.53 ±â€¯3.41 at minute 30 (P = 0.449). In the fentanyl group, this severity was 9.66 ±â€¯88.8 in the beginning of the study (P < 0.001), 7.27 ±â€¯1.37 at minute 5 (P < 0.001), 4.61 ±â€¯1.5 at minute 15 (P = 0.004) and 1.24 ±â€¯1.25 at minute 30 (P = 0.449). The general prevalence of the medication side-effects was 10 (15.4%) in the ketamine group and 1 (1.5%) in the fentanyl group (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine was found to be less effective than fentanyl in controlling renal colic-induced pain, and to be associated with a higher prevalence of side-effects; nevertheless, ketamine can be effective in controlling this pain in conjunction with other medications.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Dissociative/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Renal Colic/drug therapy , Administration, Intranasal , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement , Treatment Outcome
3.
Rev Recent Clin Trials ; 15(1): 76-82, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31738150

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of intradermal administration of sterile water compared to intravenous morphine on patients with renal colic. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial study was conducted in 2017 to compare the therapeutic effects of intradermal sterile water with those of intravenous morphine on patients with renal colic presenting to the emergency departments (ED) of Imam Khomeini and Golestan Hospitals in Ahvaz, Iran. The first group received 0.5 ml of intradermal sterile water, and the second group 0.1mg/kg of intravenous morphine plus 0.5 ml of intradermal sterile water in the most painful area or the center of the painful area in the flank. The pain severity was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and the medication side-effects were recorded at the beginning of the study and minutes 15, 30,45 and 60. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were studied in two groups. The mean severity of pain was 2.97 ± 1.51 in the sterile water group and 2.34 ± 1.89 in the morphine group at minute 30 (P=0.042), 2.58 ± 1.43 in the sterile water group and 1 ± 1.23 in the morphine group at minute 45 (P<0.001), and 1.89 ± 1.7 in the sterile water group and 0.52 ± 0.79 in the morphine group at minute 60 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Morphine reduces pain faster and more effectively than intradermal sterile water; nevertheless, treatment with intradermal sterile water can be used as an appropriate surrogate or adjunct therapy for pain control, particularly in special patients or in case of medication scarcity.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/prevention & control , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Renal Colic/complications , Renal Colic/therapy , Water/administration & dosage , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Acute Pain/etiology , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Injections, Intradermal , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Young Adult
4.
J Environ Public Health ; 2014: 504017, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25093023

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to report the characteristics and treatment strategies of all patients with acute bronchospasm who were presented to the emergency departments of Ahvaz, Iran, following the occurrence of a thunderstorm on November 2, 2013. A total of 2000 patients presenting with asthma attacks triggered by thunderstorm were interviewed and an initial questionnaire was completed for each individual. After twenty days, patients were asked to complete a supplementary questionnaire, but only 800 of them accepted to do so. The majority of subjects was aged 20-40 years (60.5%) and had no history of asthma in most cases (60.0%). The symptoms had started outdoors for 60.0% of the participants. In most patients, the onset of the condition was on November 2. Short-acting ß 2-agonist (salbutamol) and aminophylline were the most commonly prescribed medications in the emergency department. Upon the second interview, 85.3% of the patients were still symptomatic. Overall, 63.6% did not have a follow-up visit after hospital discharge, although all of them were referred to the specialist. The findings of the present study suggest that thunderstorm-associated asthma could affect young adults with no gender priority, with or without asthma history, which put a strain on emergency medical services.


Subject(s)
Asthma/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Weather , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Asthma/etiology , Cities/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...