A narrative review of the impacts of income, education, and ethnicity on arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease in the world.

Nontransmissible chronic diseases (NTCDs) are the leading causes of death worldwide, causing serious social and economic consequences in all societies and economies and emerging as a major public health problem. One of the ways of coping the social and economic impact caused by the NTCDs is the elaboration of effective public policies; one of the instruments used for the elaboration of public policies is the social indicators. The most popular indicator at present is the Human Development Index (HDI), which covers the dimensions of longevity, education, and income. The Inequality-adjusted HDI (IHDI) was implemented that quantifies the effects of inequality in development, measured in terms of HDI. The objective of the present study was to analyze the impact of income, education, and ethnicity in hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the world, through the narrative review of the literature and analyzing the social indicators HDI and IHDI of the countries analyzed. After analyzing 161 studies from 96 countries, we identified that income, education, and color impact on the prevalence, incidence, diagnosis, treatment, progression, and mortality of hypertension, DM, and CKD in both low- and middle-income countries' development, as well as high and very high human development. The HDI data for all countries change when adjusted for inequality. The theme related to social factors needs to be a constant in the elaboration of health policies, as well as present in the professional doing.

Impact of social vulnerability on the outcomes of predialysis chronic kidney disease patients in an interdisciplinary center.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies examined the associations between socio-demographic, economic and individual factors and chronic kidney disease (CKD) outcomes and observed that the associations were complex and multifactorial. Socioeconomic factors can be evaluated by a model of social vulnerability (SV). OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of SV on the outcomes of predialysis patients. METHODS: Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected from a cohort of patients with predialysis stage 3 to 5 who were treated by an interdisciplinary team (January 2002 and December 2009) in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Factor, cluster and discriminant analysis were performed in sequence to identify the most important variables and develop a model of SV that allowed for classification of the patients as vulnerable or non-vulnerable. Cox regression was performed to examine the impact of SV on the outcomes of mortality and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). RESULTS: Of the 209 patients examined, 29.4% were classified as vulnerable. No significance difference was found between the vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups regarding either mortality (log rank: 0.23) or need for RRT (log rank: 0.17). In the Cox regression model, the hazard ratios (HRs) for the unadjusted and adjusted impact of SV on mortality were found to be 1.87 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-5.41) and 1.47 (CI: 0.35-6.0), respectively, and the unadjusted and adjusted impact of need for RRT to be 1.85 (CI: 0.71-4.8) and 2.19 (CI: 0.50-9.6), respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that SV did not influence the outcomes of patients with predialysis CKD treated in an interdisciplinary center.

Impact of social vulnerability on the outcomes of predialysis chronic kidney disease patients in an interdisciplinary center / Impacto da vulnerabilidade social nos desfechos de pacientes com doença renal crônica pré-dialítica em um centro interdisciplinar

Introduction: Numerous studies examined the associations between socio-demographic, economic and individual factors and chronic kidney disease (CKD) outcomes and observed that the associations were complex and multifactorial. Socioeconomic factors can be evaluated by a model of social vulnerability (SV). Objective: To analyze the impact of SV on the outcomes of predialysis patients. Methods: Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected from a cohort of patients with predialysis stage 3 to 5 who were treated by an interdisciplinary team (January 2002 and December 2009) in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Factor, cluster and discriminant analysis were performed in sequence to identify the most important variables and develop a model of SV that allowed for classification of the patients as vulnerable or non-vulnerable. Cox regression was performed to examine the impact of SV on the outcomes of mortality and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Results: Of the 209 patients examined, 29.4% were classified as vulnerable. No significance difference was found between the vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups regarding either mortality (log rank: 0.23) or need for RRT (log rank: 0.17). In the Cox regression model, the hazard ratios (HRs) for the unadjusted and adjusted impact of SV on mortality were found to be 1.87 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-5.41) and 1.47 (CI: 0.35-6.0), respectively, and the unadjusted and adjusted impact of need for RRT to be 1.85 (CI: 0.71-4.8) and 2.19 (CI: 0.50-9.6), respectively. Conclusion: These findings indicate that SV did not influence the outcomes of patients with predialysis CKD treated in an interdisciplinary center. .

Introdução: Inúmeros estudos avaliaram as associações entre fatores sociodemográficos, econômicos e doença renal crônica (DRC) e demonstraram que essas associações foram complexas e multifatoriais. Um método para avaliar os fatores socioeconômicos é construir um modelo de vulnerabilidade social (VS). Objetivo: Identificar a influência de vulnerabilidade social (VS) sobre os desfechos de uma coorte de pacientes com doença renal crônica (DRC) pré-dialítica. Métodos: Foram coletados dados demográficos, clínicos e laboratoriais, em uma coorte retrospectiva com pacientes nos estágios 3 a 5, que foram acompanhados por uma equipe interdisciplinar, no período compreendido entre janeiro de 2002 e dezembro de 2009, em Minas Gerais, Brasil. Para calcular a VS, foram utilizadas três técnicas estatísticas em sequência, análise fatorial, análise de agrupamento e análise discriminante. A sobrevida foi analisada com as curvas de Kaplan-Meier. O desfecho foi mortalidade ou iniciar a terapia renal substitutiva (TRS), analisadas por uma regressão de Cox. Resultados: Foram avaliados 209 pacientes, 29,4% eram vulneráveis. Não observamos diferença na mortalidade entre os grupos VS pela Kaplan Meier. Na regressão de Cox, hazard ratio (HR) e intervalo de confiança (CI) para o impacto da VS sobre a mortalidade, não ajustado foi HR: 1.87 (CI: 0.64-5 0,41) e HR ajustado:1,47 (C1: 0.35-60,0). O impacto da VS em TRS mostrou o HR e CI HR não ajustado: 1,85 (CI: 0.7140,8) e HR ajustado: 2,19 (CI: 0.50-90,6). Conclusão: Estes resultados indicam que a VS não influenciou os resultados de pacientes com DRC na pré-diálise tratados em um centro interdisciplinar. .

Association between laboratory and clinical risk factors and progression of the predialytic chronic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a very common condition that has become a public health issue. Knowing more about risk factors associated with the progression of CKD allows therapeutic interventions that may change the natural course of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of clinical and laboratory variables at admission on the outcomes death and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comprised of 211 adult patients with stages 3-5 CKD, followed-up for 56.6 ± 34.5 months. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 65.4 ± 15.1 years and 63.5% were > 60 years. The main causes of CKD were hypertensive nephrosclerosis (29%) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) (17%). Most patients (47.3%) were on stage 4 CKD. The mean annual loss of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 0.6 ± 2.5 mL/min/1.73 m² (median 0.77 mL/min/1.73 m²) After the adjustments for demographic, clinical and laboratory variables, DKD [relative risk (RR) 4.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.47 to 13.2; p = 0.008] was predictive of RRT; age (RR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.15; p < 0.0001) and the non-treatment with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) (RR 4.18, 95% CI, 1.34 to 12.9; p = 0.01) were predictors of death. Renal and patient survival rates were 70.9% and 68.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, patients with stage 3-5 CKD treated conservatively showed stabilization of renal function and low mortality, which were impacted by DKD, age and to not using ARB, respectively.

Associação entre fatores de risco clínicos e laboratoriais e progressão da doença renal crônica pré-dialítica / Association between laboratory and clinical risk factors and progression of the predialytic chronic kidney disease

INTRODUÇÃO: A doença renal crônica (DRC) é muito prevalente e representa um importante problema de saúde pública. O maior conhecimento dos fatores de risco relacionados à progressão da DRC permite adotar estratégias terapêuticas que podem alterar o curso natural da doença. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o impacto de variáveis clínicas e laboratoriais à admissão nos desfechos de óbito e início de terapia renal substitutiva (TRS). MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte retrospectiva, composta de 211 pacientes adultos com DRC nos estágios 3-5 tratados, acompanhados por 56,6 ± 34,5 meses. RESULTADOS: A idade média dos pacientes foi de 65,4 ± 15,1 anos, sendo 63,5% com > 60 anos. As principais etiologias de DRC foram nefroesclerose hipertensiva (29%) e doença renal diabética (DRD) (17%). A maioria dos pacientes encontrava-se no estágio 4 da DRC (47,3%). A perda média anual de taxa de filtração glomerular (TFG) foi 0,6 ± 2,5 mL/min/1,73 m² (mediana 0,7 mL/min/1,73 m²). Após os ajustes para as variáveis demográficas, clínicas e laboratoriais, concluiu-se que apresentar DRD [risco relativo (RR) 4,4; intervalo de confiança (IC) 95%, 1,47-13,2; p = 0,008] foi preditor de TRS e a idade (RR 1,09; IC 95%, 1,04-1,15; p < 0,0001) e o não tratamento com bloqueador do receptor da angiotensina (BRA) (RR 4,18; IC 95%, 1,34-12,9; p = 0,01) foram preditores de óbito. A sobrevida renal e a geral dos pacientes foram de 70,9% e 68,6%, respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: Neste estudo, os pacientes com DRC nos estágios 3-5 tratados conservadoramente apresentaram estabilização funcional e baixa mortalidade, desfechos associados à DRD, idade e não tratamento com BRA.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a very common condition that has become a public health issue. Knowing more about risk factors associated with the progression of CKD allows therapeutic interventions that may change the natural course of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of clinical and laboratory variables at admission on the outcomes death and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comprised of 211 adult patients with stages 3-5 CKD, followed-up for 56.6 ± 34.5 months. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 65.4 ± 15.1 years and 63.5% were > 60 years. The main causes of CKD were hypertensive nephrosclerosis (29%) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) (17%). Most patients (47.3%) were on stage 4 CKD. The mean annual loss of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 0.6 ± 2.5 mL/min/1.73 m² (median 0.77 mL/min/1.73 m²) After the adjustments for demographic, clinical and laboratory variables, DKD [relative risk (RR) 4.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.47 to 13.2; p = 0.008] was predictive of RRT; age (RR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.15; p < 0.0001) and the non-treatment with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) (RR 4.18, 95% CI, 1.34 to 12.9; p = 0.01) were predictors of death. Renal and patient survival rates were 70.9% and 68.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, patients with stage 3-5 CKD treated conservatively showed stabilization of renal function and low mortality, which were impacted by DKD, age and to not using ARB, respectively.