Effect of computer-aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Multiple computer-aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. While adenoma detection rates (ADR) and polyp detection rates (PDR) are important colonoscopy quality indicators, adenoma miss rates (AMR) may better quantify missed lesions, which can ultimately lead to interval colorectal cancer. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of computer-aided colonoscopy (CAC) with respect to AMR, ADR, and PDR in randomized controlled trials. METHODS: A comprehensive, systematic literature search was performed across multiple databases in September of 2022 to identify randomized, controlled trials that compared CAC with traditional colonoscopy. Primary outcomes were AMR, ADR, and PDR. RESULTS: Fourteen studies totaling 10 928 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a 65% reduction in the adenoma miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25-0.49, P < 0.001, I2  = 50%). There was a 78% reduction in the sessile serrated lesion miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.65, P < 0.01, I2  = 0%). There was a 52% increase in ADR in the CAC group compared with the control group (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39-1.67, P = 0.04, I2  = 47%). There was 93% increase in the number of adenomas > 10 mm detected per colonoscopy with CAC (OR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.18-3.16, P < 0.01, I2  = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study demonstrate the promise of CAC in improving AMR, ADR, PDR across a spectrum of size and morphological lesion characteristics.

Patients with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Have an Increased Risk of Second Primary Malignancy.

BACKGROUND: While overall colorectal cancer (CRC) rates in the USA are declining, the incidence of early-onset CRC (eoCRC) under age 50 is increasing. The aim of this study was to examine the risk of a second primary malignancy (SPM) in individuals with eoCRC, and how this risk compares to those with late-onset CRC (loCRC). METHODS: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database to examine the risk of SPM after a diagnosis of eoCRC. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were used to estimate the risk of SPM after eoCRC and loCRC in comparison with the risk of malignancy in the general population. RESULTS: Compared to the general population, individuals with eoCRC, but not loCRC, had an increased lifetime risk of SPM (SIR 1.42, 95% CI 1.37-1.48 and SIR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.02, respectively), and locations at highest risk were the small intestine, ureter, rectum, and colon. The risk of SPM after eoCRC was similar in men and women, but higher in non-whites compared to whites and higher in those with a lower area-level median household income. The risk of SPM following eoCRC was high in the first 5 years after diagnosis (SIR 2.44, 95% CI 2.24-2.66) and, in a birth cohort analysis, was found to be increasing over time. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with eoCRC have a lifetime risk of SPM nearly 50% higher than the general population. The risk of SPM is highest in the first 5 years after diagnosis and is increasing over time.