Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 12(5): 953-957, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37448938

ABSTRACT

Background: There is a very little information known about CRP in term pregnancies. It is a marker that is easily tested and is inexpensive. Although CRP has been used very effectively in diagnosing infection in the neonate, its clinical use and values have not been studied in term pregnancies. The level of CRP that is truly normal or clinically innocuous is not known. Objectives: This is a cross-sectional study to compare the CRP levels in antenatal women with PROM and women with normal labor and assess its utility to predict sepsis. Methods: This is a prospective study done over a period of one year and approved by the insititutional ethical committee (IRB. Min. No 11102[OBSERVE] dated 10.01.2018). Sample for CRP was collected from 112 antenatal women with prelabor rupture of membranes within 12 hours of admission (Group A) and from 112 antenatal women in spontaneous labor without rupture of membrane (Group B). CRP samples are processed by nephelometry method. Results: The median CRP value in Group A is 9.15 and Group B is 7.26, with no statistical difference. Chorioamnionitis, neonatal sepsis, and endometritis were similar in both the groups. Conclusion: CRP cannot be used as predictor for chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and neonatal sepsis. There was no significant difference in CRP levels between the two groups.

2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 163(2): 586-593, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37184055

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study and compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19 in pregnancy during the two waves of the pandemic in India. METHODS: This observational, retrospective cohort study on pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection was conducted in a 2700-bed tertiary referral center in South India from March 1, 2020 to June 30 2021. The clinical presentation, severity, and maternal and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19 were compared between the two waves. RESULTS: A total of 623 pregnant women tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection in our institute; 379 (60.8%) were diagnosed during the first wave and 244 (39.2%) in the second wave. Most of the affected women (81.1%) were in their third trimester. Maternal mortality rate was 823 per 100 000 live births. Composite maternal outcome (increasing requirement for ventilation, pulmonary embolism, disease progression) were more pronounced during the second wave (2.1% vs 6.1%). Between the two waves, both maternal (1 vs 3; P = 0.162) and perinatal (3.2% vs 6.7%; P = 0.065) deaths were higher during the second wave. The cesarean section rate was high during the first wave (48% vs 32.4%; P < 0.001). Preterm births were comparable between the two waves (19.5% vs 22%; P < 0.500). CONCLUSION: The women presented with more severe illness during the second wave of COVID-19. There was higher perinatal mortality, but the maternal mortality was similar between the two waves.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cesarean Section , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers , India/epidemiology , Perinatal Mortality , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology
3.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 11(9): 5254-5256, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36505517

ABSTRACT

Introduction: New onset hypertension is more common in antenatal women with increased Body Mass Index (BMI). This may be due to either gestational hypertension (GH) or pre-eclampsia (PE). GH unlike PE is not associated with poor perinatal outcomes and would not require interventions such as increased antenatal visits and induction of labour. Our study assessed the prevalence of GH and PE in women with increased BMI as compared to women with normal BMI. Setting and Design: Historical cohort of a large tertiary centre. Method and Materials: Data from the electronic birth registry of the labour room was used to identify women who had a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 at delivery. Women with a normal BMI matched for the mode of delivery was taken as control. 148 women with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 were compared with 140 women of normal BMI. Results: New onset hypertension was seen in 41.2% (61/148) and 8.6% (12/140) in the non-obese group RR 4.81 (2.7-8.54) P (<0.001). GH was seen in 24.3% in obese women and 2.9% in normal controls, RR (9.65 (3.54,26.34)), P (<0.001). PE was seen in 16.9% of obese women and 5.7% of women with normal BMI, RR (3.79 (1.78,8.08)) P (<0.001). Proportion of GH in women with new onset hypertension was seen in 59% of obese women with new onset hypertension and 33% of normal controls. Conclusion: This clinically relevant trend towards an increased proportion of GH highlights the importance of identifying pathophysiological mechanism for high BP in obesity when there is new onset hypertension.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...