Transfemoral amputations: the effect of residual limb length and orientation on gait analysis outcome measures.

BACKGROUND: The level of function achieved following a transfemoral amputation is believed to be affected by surgical attachment of the remaining musculature, resulting orientation of the femur, residual limb length, and eventual prosthetic fit. METHODS: Twenty-six subjects underwent gait analysis testing in the current preferred prosthesis more than twenty-four months postamputation. The femoral length and orientation angles of each subject were measured from standing postoperative radiographic scanograms. The subjects were separated into groups for analysis on the basis of the femoral shaft angles and the residual limb length ratios. Gait analysis was performed to collect kinematic and temporospatial parameters. RESULTS: A good correlation was observed between residual femoral length and trunk with regard to forward lean (r = -0.683) and lateral flexion (r = -0.628). A good correlation was also observed between residual femoral length and pelvic motion with regard to pelvic tilt (r = -0.691) and obliquity (r = -0.398). A moderate correlation was observed with speed (r = 0.550), indicating that subjects with shorter residual limbs experienced a greater excursion in the torso and pelvis, while walking at a slower self-selected pace. A significant correlation (r = 0.721, p < 0.001) was observed between the femoral shaft abduction angle and the residual femoral length; the shorter the residual limb, the more abducted it was. CONCLUSIONS: The length of the residual femur substantially influences temporospatial and kinematic gait outcomes following transfemoral amputation, and appears to be more important than femoral orientation with regard to these parameters.

Comparison of an in-helmet temperature monitor system to rectal temperature during exercise.

Body temperature monitoring is crucial in helping to decrease the amount and severity of heat illnesses; however, a practical method of monitoring temperature is lacking. In response to the lack of a practical method of monitoring the temperature of athletes, Hothead Technologies developed a device (HOT), which continuously monitors an athlete's fluctuations in body temperature. HOT measures forehead temperature inside helmets. The purpose of this study was to compare HOT against rectal temperature (Trec). Male volunteers (n = 29, age = 23.5 ± 4.5 years, weight = 83.8 ± 10.4 kg, height = 180.1 ± 5.8 cm, body fat = 12.3 ± 4.5%) exercised on a treadmill at an intensity of 60-75% heart rate reserve (HRR) (wet bulb globe temperature [WBGT] = 28.7° C) until Trec reached 38.7° C. The correlation between Trec and HOT was 0.801 (R = 0.64, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 0.25, p = 0.00). One reason for this relatively high correlation is the microclimate that HOT is monitoring. HOT is not affected by the external climate greatly because of its location in the helmet. Therefore, factors such as evaporation do not alter HOT temperature to a great degree. HOT was compared with Trec in a controlled setting, and the exercise used in this study was moderate aerobic exercise, very unlike that used in football. In a controlled laboratory setting, the relationship between HOT and Trec showed favorable correlations. However, in applied settings, helmets are repeatedly removed and replaced forcing HOT to equilibrate to forehead temperature every time the helmet is replaced. Therefore, future studies are needed to mimic how HOT will be used in field situations.

Custom-molded foot-orthosis intervention and multisegment medial foot kinematics during walking.

CONTEXT: Foot-orthosis (FO) intervention to prevent and treat numerous lower extremity injuries is widely accepted clinically. However, the results of quantitative gait analyses have been equivocal. The foot models used, participants receiving intervention, and orthoses used might contribute to the variability. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a custom-molded FO intervention on multisegment medial foot kinematics during walking in participants with low-mobile foot posture. DESIGN: Crossover study. SETTING: University biomechanics and ergonomics laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen participants with low-mobile foot posture (7 men, 9 women) were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 FO groups. INTERVENTION(S): After a 2-week period to break in the FOs, individuals participated in a gait analysis that consisted of 5 successful walking trials (1.3 to 1.4 m/s) during no-FO and FO conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Three-dimensional displacements during 4 subphases of stance (loading response, midstance, terminal stance, preswing) were computed for each multisegment foot model articulation. RESULTS: Repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed that rearfoot complex dorsiflexion displacement during midstance was greater in the FO than the no-FO condition (F(1,14) = 5.24, P = .04, partial η(2) = 0.27). Terminal stance repeated-measures ANOVA results revealed insert-by-insert condition interactions for the first metatarsophalangeal joint complex (F(1,14) = 7.87, P = .01, partial η(2) = 0.36). However, additional follow-up analysis did not reveal differences between the no-FO and FO conditions for the balanced traditional orthosis (F(1,14) = 4.32, P = .08, partial η(2) = 0.38) or full-contact orthosis (F(1,14) = 4.10, P = .08, partial η(2) = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Greater rearfoot complex dorsiflexion during midstance associated with FO intervention may represent improved foot kinematics in people with low-mobile foot postures. Furthermore, FO intervention might partially correct dysfunctional kinematic patterns associated with low-mobile foot postures.

The effect of low-mobile foot posture on multi-segment medial foot model gait kinematics.

A number of in vitro, invasive in vivo, and non-invasive marker based multi-segment foot models (MSFMs) have reported significant motion in the articulations distal to the calcaneus during gait. Few studies, however, have applied a MSFM to the investigation of the effect of foot posture on gait kinematics. Differences in stance phase kinematics between participants with low-mobile (LMF) (n=11) versus "typical" (TYPF) (n=11) foot postures were investigated using a multi-segment medial foot model. Three-dimensional position and stance phase excursions of four functional articulations (rearfoot complex [RC], calcaneonavicular complex [CNC], medial forefoot, first metatarsophalangeal complex) were quantified using an eight optical camera motion analysis system (Vicon Motus, Vicon Motions Systems, Centennial, CO) and a custom written software program (Matlab 7.0.1, The MathWorks, Natick, MA), respectively. Excursions during four subphases of stance phase (loading response, midstance, terminal stance, pre-swing) at each of the functional articulations were compared using multivariate analyses of variance (alpha

The effect of 6 weeks of custom-molded foot orthosis intervention on postural stability in participants with >or=7 degrees of forefoot varus.

OBJECTIVE: Postural stability (PS) was assessed in a group of participants with >or=7 degrees of forefoot varus (FV) after 6 weeks of custom-molded functional foot orthosis (FO) intervention to investigate the effect of FO intervention in a population that may have decreased PS due to their foot structure. DESIGN: A force platform was used to assess right and left single-limb stance position and eyes open and eyes closed condition PS. SETTING: PS was assessed in a biomechanics research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve participants with >or=7 degrees of FV (MFV) and 5 participants with <7 degrees of FV (LFV) participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: PS of the MFV group was assessed initially when FOs were received and after 6 weeks of FO intervention. The LFV group PS was assessed during initial and 6-week testing sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The root mean square of the center of pressure velocity was used to quantify single-limb stance PS during no FO and FO conditions. RESULTS: LFV group PS did not change significantly (P=0.829) over the 6-week time period. Significant improvement was, however, reported in the MFV group anteroposterior (P=0.003) and mediolateral (P=0.032) PS at the 6-week assessment versus the initial assessment during both the noFO and FO conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of FO intervention may significantly improve PS in participants with >or=7 degrees of FV both when wearing FOs and when not wearing FOs.

The effect of forefoot varus on postural stability.

STUDY DESIGN: Counterbalanced experimental design study comparing a group of subjects with greater than or equal to 70 of forefoot varus (MFV) to a group with less than 70 of forefoot varus (LFV). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of forefoot varus on single-limb stance postural stability (PS). BACKGROUND: Impaired PS has been implicated as a potential risk factor for sustaining acute foot and ankle injuries. The identification of variables that deleteriously affect PS may be important in the prevention of future injuries. METHODS AND MEASURES: Postural stability of the MFV group (n = 20) and the LFV group (n = 12) was assessed during right and left single-limb stance and eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Standard deviations of the x-axis and y-axis ground reaction forces measured via a force platform were used to represent anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) PS, respectively. The mean of 3 successful 5-second trials of each testing condition was calculated and used for subsequent data analysis using 3-way mixed-model ANOVAs with 1 between-subject and 2 within-subject factors. RESULTS: The AP PS scores of the MFV group were significantly greater than those of the LFV group (P < .05). ML PS scores, although higher in the MFV group, were not significantly different from those of the LFV group. Both groups had significantly greater AP and ML PS scores during the eyes-closed versus the eyes-open condition (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the presence of greater than or equal to 70 of forefoot varus may significantly impair AP PS. The decreased stability associated with increased forefoot varus may be due to decreased joint congruity and consequently an increased reliance on soft tissue structures for stability.