ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Examining the distribution of breast cancer (BC) stage and molecular subtype among women aged below (< 45 years), within (45-65 years), and above (> 65 years) the recommended screening age range helps to understand the screening program's characteristics and contributes to enhancing the effectiveness of BC screening programs. METHODS: In this retrospective study, female patients with newly diagnosed BC from 2010 to 2020 were identified. The distribution of cases in terms of TNM stages, severity classes, and subtypes was analysed according to age groups. RESULTS: A total of 3282 women diagnosed with BC were included in the analysis. Among these cases 51.4% were detected outside the screening age group, and these were characterized by a higher TNM stage compared to those diagnosed within the screening age band. We observed significantly higher relative frequency of advanced BC in the older age group compared to both the screening age population and women younger than 45 years (14.9% vs. 8.7% and 7.7%, P < 0.001). HR-/HER2- and HER+ tumours were relatively more frequent among women under age 45 years (HR-/HER2-: 23.6%, HER2+: 20.5%) compared to those within the screening age range (HR-/HER2-: 13.4%, HER2+: 13.9%) and the older age group (HR-/HER2-: 10.4%, HER2+: 11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study shed light on potential areas for the improvement of BC screening programs (e.g., extending screening age group, adjusting screening frequency based on molecular subtype risk status) in Hungary and internationally, as well.
ABSTRACT
Several technological developments have been carried out recently to improve the effectiveness of breast cancer screening. Most of them have emerged as a complementary method to mammography. Automated breast ultrasound is one of these technologies. The objective of this study is to provide an overview on guidelines and recommenda-tions related to the application of automated breast ultrasound as a screening modality and to summarize the scien-tific literature. Targeted literature review was performed to collect information. We searched in publicly available databases for guidelines and recommendations as well as scientific publications on screening and early detection. We found substantial amount of information about automated breast ultrasound mainly for patients with dense breast; however, breast cancer screening guidelines have not yet incorporated this technology. 9 clinical studies were in-cluded in the review, most of them were single-arm studies with relatively short follow-up time. Most of them were performed in the USA. Results were presented mainly for short-term outcomes of breast cancer screening: sensitiv-ity, specificity, tumor detection rate and recall rate. The opportunity for retrospective evaluation of the images and the reproducibility are considered the most important advantages. Evidence suggest that the cancer detection rate can be improved compared to mammography alone in women with dense breast. The main disadvantages of this technology are the high recall and false positive rates. Further scientific evidence is required to reduce uncertainty related to the use of automated breast ultrasound for breast cancer screening.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammography , Breast Density , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Mass Screening , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Introduction: The sensitivity of mammography screening is lower in women with dense breast. Increasing the efficacy of breast cancer screening have received special attention recently. The automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) shows promising results to complement mammography. Our aim was to expand the existing breast cancer screening protocol with ABUS within a Hungarian pilot project. Methods: First, we developed a protocol for the screening process focusing on integrating ABUS to the current practice. Consensus among clinical experts was achieved considering information from the literature and the actual opportunities of the hospital. Then we developed a protocol for evaluation that ensures systematic data collection and monitoring of screening with mammography and ABUS. We identified indicators based on international standards and adapted them to local setting. We considered their feasibility from the data source and timeframe perspective. The protocol was developed in a partnership of researchers, clinicians and hospital managers. Results: The process of screening activity was described in a detailed flowchart. Human and technological resource requirements and communication activities were defined. We listed 23 monitoring indicators to evaluate the screening program and checked the feasibility to calculate these indicators based on local data collection and other sources. Partnership between researchers experienced in planning and evaluating screening programs, interested clinicians, and hospital managers resulted in a locally implementable, evidence-based screening protocol. Discussion: The experience and knowledge gained on the implementation of the ABUS technology could generate real-world data to support the decision on using the technology at national level.
