Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 21(2): 209-14, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22150213

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In utero diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure is a risk factor for rare development of vaginal and cervical cancer and may potentially be a risk factor for breast cancer. Mammography use in this population is relatively unknown; therefore, this study aims to determine if in utero DES exposure is associated with the frequency of mammography screening examinations while considering demographic and clinical factors. METHODS: Using combined DES cohort questionnaire data, self-reported mammography screening over the past 5 years (2001-2006) was analyzed in women aged ≥45 years. Binary logistic regression assessed if DES exposure was associated with mammography use after adjustment for benign breast disease (BBD), previous cancer diagnosis, and whether insurance access influenced screening use. RESULTS: Overall, the frequency of mammography examinations was similar for both DES-exposed and unexposed women. DES-exposed (n=2986) and unexposed women (n=1397) over the age of 44 reported receiving ≥3 mammography examinations in the past 5 years (73.8% and 74.0%, respectively). After adjustment, DES exposure was not associated with ≥3 mammograms in the past 5 years compared to ≤2 examinations (odds ratio [OR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.17), p=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In utero DES exposure was not associated with mammography use, nor was health insurance status or a BBD or cancer diagnosis. Because of the potential elevated risk for breast cancer in women exposed prenatally to DES, continued monitoring of standard mammography recommendations is recommended for this group, which is predominantly over the age of 45.


Subject(s)
Diethylstilbestrol/adverse effects , Estrogens, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/chemically induced , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
2.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 18(4): 547-52, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19361323

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine if women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol (DES) are more likely than unexposed women to receive recommended or additional breast cancer screening examinations. METHODS: 1994 Diethylstilbestrol-Adenosis (DESAD) cohort data are used to assess the degree of recommended compliance of breast cancer screenings found in 3140 DES-exposed and 826 unexposed women. Participants were enrolled at four sites: Houston, Boston, Rochester, and Los Angeles. Logistic regression modeling was used to analyze mailed questionnaire data that included reported frequency over the preceding 5 years (1990-1994) of breast-self examinations (BSEs), clinical breast examinations (CBEs), and mammograms. RESULTS: DES-exposed women exceeded annual recommendations for CBEs (aOR 2.20, 95% CI, 1.04-4.67) among women without a history of benign breast disease (BBD) compared with unexposed women. There were no other statistically significant differences between exposed and unexposed women who reported performing BSEs, CBEs (<40 years of age), and mammographies, regardless of BBD history. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of DES-exposed women receive breast cancer screenings at least at recommended intervals, but over two thirds do not perform monthly BSEs. Future efforts should be focused on further educating this and other at-risk populations through mailed reminders and during patient consultations on the benefits of screening examinations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Diethylstilbestrol/adverse effects , Estrogens, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , United States
3.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 12(2): 111-7, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18369304

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol (DES) report receiving more cervical and general physical examinations compared to unexposed women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1994 Diethylstilbestrol Adenosis cohort data are used to assess the degree of recommended compliance of cervical screenings found in 3,140 DES-exposed and 826 unexposed women. Participants were enrolled at 4 sites: Houston, Boston, Rochester, and Los Angeles. Logistic regression modeling was used to analyze mailed questionnaire data, which included reported frequency over the preceding 5 years (1990-1994) of Papanicolaou smears and general physical examinations. RESULTS: Diethylstilbestrol-exposed women exceeded the recommended frequency of Papanicolaou smear screenings [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.15, 95% CI (confidence interval) = 1.60-2.88] compared to the unexposed. This association held among those without a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (aOR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.35-2.62). Diethylstilbestrol-exposed women exceeded annual recommendations for physical examinations (aOR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.16-4.43) among women without a history of chronic disease when compared to unexposed women. CONCLUSIONS: Most DES-exposed women are receiving cervical cancer screening at least at recommended intervals, but one third of the women are not receiving annual Papanicolaou smear examinations.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Behavior , Diethylstilbestrol/adverse effects , Papanicolaou Test , Physical Examination/psychology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vaginal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vaginal Smears/psychology , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Administration, Intravaginal , Adult , Diethylstilbestrol/administration & dosage , Estrogens, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Estrogens, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Physical Examination/methods , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/chemically induced , Vaginal Neoplasms/etiology , Vaginal Smears/methods
4.
Pediatrics ; 118(5): 1932-42, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17079564

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that media portrayals of tobacco and alcohol use are important predictors of adolescent smoking and drinking. We examined the role of parents in monitoring and limiting children's movie exposure and whether or not this was associated with a lower risk of adolescent smoking and drinking. DESIGN: We surveyed 2606 child-parent dyads between 2002 and 2003. We asked children (9-12 years of age) how often their parents engaged in specific behaviors to monitor their movie viewing and if their parents allowed them to watch R-rated movies. We also surveyed children about parental monitoring of nonmedia-related behaviors. The primary outcomes were risk of smoking and drinking alcohol, defined by attitudinal susceptibility or early experimentation with either substance. RESULTS: Less than half (45.0%) the children were prohibited from watching R-rated movies. Of those who were allowed to watch R-rated movies, one third (34.7%) always viewed them with a parent and two thirds (65.3%) sometimes watched them without a parent. Less than 10% of the children reported that their parents consistently engaged in all 4 movie-monitoring behaviors. Even after controlling for parental monitoring of nonmedia-related behaviors and other covariates, children were at lower risk of smoking and drinking if their parents prohibited them from watching R-rated movies. Parental coviewing of R-rated movies was associated with a lower risk of child smoking but not drinking if parents consistently monitored what their children watched. CONCLUSIONS: Parental rules and monitoring of children's movie viewing may have a protective influence on children's risk for smoking and drinking, over and above parental monitoring of nonmedia related behaviors. This highlights a potential role for parents in preventing early initiation of tobacco and alcohol use among adolescents.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Child Rearing , Motion Pictures , Smoking/epidemiology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Pediatrics ; 116(5): 1183-91, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16264007

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Regional studies have linked exposure to movie smoking with adolescent smoking. We examined this association in a representative US sample. DESIGN/METHODS: We conducted a random-digit-dial survey of 6522 US adolescents aged 10 to 14 years. Using previously validated methods, we estimated exposure to movie smoking, in 532 recent box-office hits, and examined its relation with adolescents having ever tried smoking a cigarette. RESULTS: The distributions of demographics and census region in the unweighted sample were almost identical to 2000 US Census estimates, confirming representativeness. Overall, 10% of the population had tried smoking. Quartile (Q) of movie smoking exposure was significantly associated with the prevalence of smoking initiation: 0.02 of adolescents in Q1 had tried smoking; 0.06 in Q2; 0.11 in Q3; and 0.22 in Q4. This association did not differ significantly by race/ethnicity or census region. After controlling for sociodemographics, friend/sibling/parent smoking, school performance, personality characteristics, and parenting style, the adjusted odds ratio for having tried smoking were 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1, 2.7) for Q2, 1.8 (95% CI: 1.2, 2.9) for Q3, and 2.6 (95% CI: 1.7, 4.1) for Q4 compared with adolescents in Q1. The covariate-adjusted attributable fraction was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.20, 0.56), suggesting that exposure to movie smoking is the primary independent risk factor for smoking initiation in US adolescents in this age group. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking in movies is a risk factor for smoking initiation among US adolescents. Limiting exposure of young adolescents to movie smoking could have important public health implications.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior , Imitative Behavior , Motion Pictures , Smoking/psychology , Adolescent , Child , Humans
6.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 159(9): 854-9, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16143745

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine preschoolers' attitudes, expectations, and perceptions of tobacco and alcohol use. DESIGN: Structured observational study. Children used props and dolls to act out a social evening for adults. As part of the role play, each child selected items from a miniature grocery store stocked with 73 different products, including beer, wine, and cigarettes, for an evening with friends. SETTING: A behavioral laboratory at the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty children, 2 to 6 years old, participated individually in the role-playing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Whether or not a child purchased cigarettes or alcohol at the store. RESULTS: Children purchased a mean of 17 of the 73 products in the store. Thirty-four children (28.3%) bought cigarettes and 74 (61.7%) bought alcohol. Children were more likely to buy cigarettes if their parents smoked (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-12.63). Children were more likely to buy beer or wine if their parents drank alcohol at least monthly (adjusted OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.02-9.10) or if they viewed PG-13- or R-rated movies (adjusted OR, 5.10; 95% CI, 1.14-22.90). Children's play behavior suggests that they are highly attentive to the use and enjoyment of alcohol and tobacco and have well-established expectations about how cigarettes and alcohol fit into social settings. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that observation of adult behavior, especially parental behavior, may influence preschool children to view smoking and drinking as appropriate or normative in social situations. These perceptions may relate to behaviors adopted later in life.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Attitude to Health , Child Behavior/psychology , Risk-Taking , Role Playing , Smoking/psychology , Social Conformity , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Learning , Male , New Hampshire , Parents/psychology , Play and Playthings , Social Environment , Social Perception , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...