Drinking and laboratory biomarkers, and nutritional status characterize the clinical presentation of early-stage alcohol-associated liver disease.

Chronic and heavy alcohol consumption is commonly observed in alcohol use disorder (AUD). AUD often leads to alcohol-associated organ injury, including alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). Approximately 10-20% of patients with AUD progress to ALD. Progression of ALD from the development phase to more advanced states involve the interplay of several pathways, including nutritional alterations. Multiple pathologic processes have been identified in the progression and severity of ALD. However, there are major gaps in the characterization and understanding of the clinical presentation of early-stage ALD as assessed by clinical markers and laboratory measures. Several Institutions and Universities, including the University of Louisville, in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health, have published a series of manuscripts describing early-stage ALD over the past decade. Here, we comprehensively describe early-stage ALD using the liver injury and drinking history markers, and the laboratory biomarkers (with a focus on nutrition status) that are uniquely involved in the development and progression of early-stage ALD.

Characterization of Hypomagnesemia in Alcoholic Hepatitis Patients and Its Association with Liver Injury and Severity Markers.

INTRODUCTION: Hypomagnesemia has been documented in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). This study aims to characterize hypomagnesemia in alcoholic hepatitis (AH) patients and identify its response with liver injury and severity markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 49 male and female AH patients with an age range of 27-66 years were enrolled in this study. Patients were grouped by MELD: MiAH (mild AH < 12 [n = 5]), MoAH (12 ≤ moderate AH ≤ 19 [n = 13]), and SAH (severe AH ≥ 20 [n = 31]). Patients were also evaluated by MELD grouping as non-severe (MELD ≤ 19 [n = 18]) and severe (MELD ≥ 20 [n = 31]). Data were collected on demographics (Age; BMI), drinking history (AUDIT; LTDH), liver injury (ALT; AST), and liver severity (Maddrey's DF; MELD; AST:ALT). Serum magnesium (SMg) levels were tested as SOC lab (normal ≥ 0.85 ≤ 1.10 mmol/L). RESULTS: SMg was deficient in each group; the lowest in the MoAH patients. The true positivity of SMg values were at a good performance level when compared between severe and non-severe AH patients (AUROC: 0.695, p = 0.034). We found that the SMg level < 0.78 mmol/L could predict severe AH (sensitivity = 0.100 and 1-specificity = 0.000) at this true positivity, and subsequently analyzed patients with SMg < 0.78 mmol/L (Gr.4) and ≥0.78 mmol/L (Gr.5). Between Gr.4 and Gr.5, there were clinically as well as statistically significant differences in disease severity as defined by MELD, Maddrey's DF, and ABIC scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of SMg levels to identify AH patients who may have progressed to severe status. The extent of magnesium response in AH patients also corresponded significantly with the prognosis of liver disease. Physicians suspecting AH in patients with recent heavy drinking may use SMg as an indicator to guide further testing, referrals, or treatment.