A culturally specific dietary plan to manage weight gain among African American breast cancer survivors: a feasibility study.

Breast cancer survival rates are lower in African Americans (AAs) than in Caucasians, owing in part to a higher prevalence of obesity in the former, which increases the risk of recurrence and mortality. The Women's Intervention Nutrition Study (WINS) found that Caucasian women who followed a low-fat eating plan experienced a lower rate of cancer recurrence than women who maintained their usual diets. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of a WINS plan tailored to the cultural needs of AA breast cancer survivors. This feasibility pilot study was conducted at a university National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center outpatient clinic with AA breast cancer survivors. The culturally specific WINS (WINS-c) plan included eight individual counseling sessions, five educational group meetings, and follow-up telephone calls over a 1-year period. Outcome measures included dietary fat, triglyceride, insulin and glucose levels, and fruit and vegetable intake. Participants (n = 8) had a mean age of 61.1 years (standard error of the mean (SEM) 3.1 years) and a mean BMI of 32 kg/m(2) (SEM 4.25 kg/m)(2). Baseline daily fat consumption decreased from 64.6 g (range 36.8-119.6g) to 44.0 g (21.6-73.4g) at 52 weeks (p = 0.07). Mean daily consumption of fruits and vegetables increased by 36% and 15%, respectively. Mean triglyceride levels decreased at 12 months (p < 0.05). Sustained hyperinsulinemia was noted in most participants, including those without diabetes. Mean calcium and vitamin D consumption decreased over the 1-year study period. In AA breast cancer survivors, the WINS-c program resulted in a trend toward reduced fat consumption and may represent a sustainable approach in this population for improvement of diet quality after breast cancer.

Computer assisted quantitative immunofluorescence of tumor tissue marker expression and clinical outcome to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer patients.

Chemotherapy is frequently used in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. The identification of patient-specific tumor characteristics that can improve the ability to predict response to chemotherapy would help optimize advanced breast cancer treatment approaches. Quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) may be applied to the standardization of protein analysis, resulting in increased sensitivity and reproducibility. In the current pilot study, QIF was used to correlate the expression of beta tubulin III and thymidylate synthase with clinical outcome associated with taxane and capecitabine treatment, respectively. QIF analysis is based on fluorescent dye-labeled monoclonal antibody staining followed by computer-assisted microscopy to measure the expression of molecular markers in tumor samples derived from a retrospective database. The interpretation of the tumor marker expression levels results in classification of breast tumors as sensitive or resistant to a mechanistically related drug. Overall diagnostic accuracy of QIF for taxane based therapy was 88% (CI 75.0 - 95.3) with a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative predictive value of 100%, while diagnostic accuracy QIF for capecitabine therapy was 86% (CI 88.0-96.0) with a positive predictive value of 80% and a negative predictive value of 100%. In this study, QIF showed retrospectively a potential for predictive value when analyzing chemotherapeutic treatments for individual advanced stage breast cancer patients. The predictive power of the QIF for chemotherapy confirms that further studies utilizing larger clinical cohorts are warranted.

Evidence-based care for breast cancer survivors: communicating the Institute of Medicine Guidelines in medical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient reports of physician communication about the 2006 Institute of Medicine (IOM) Guidelines for Survivorship Care, and patient follow-up care behaviors in a sample of African American and Caucasian breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Fifteen-minute telephone interviews were conducted in a cross-sectional study with a sample of African American (n=30) and Caucasian (n=69) breast cancer patients, who were within 5 years of their diagnosis and primary treatment for breast cancer at two Baltimore, Maryland medical centers, during the summer of 2006. Multiple items assessed patient reports of physician discussions about IOM Guidelines, their recurrence concerns, and their follow-up treatment, screening, diet and exercise practices. RESULTS: Patients with higher incomes, more education, female physicians, and of younger ages reported more complete physician discussions of the IOM Guidelines. No significant differences were noted between African American and Caucasian patients. CONCLUSION: Patients at greatest risk for breast cancer recurrence - those with less education, income, and resources - report limited guidance from their physicians about evidence-based, follow-up care guidelines, designed to minimize their risk. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Physicians need strategies for effectively delivering the IOM Guidelines for Survivorship Care to disadvantaged breast cancer patients, to promote enhanced quality of life and reduced risk of recurrence.

Review of the contemporary cytotoxic and biologic combinations available for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with > or =2 chemotherapeutic agents concurrently has been shown to increase response rates, often at the cost of a substantial increase in toxicity, and with minimal impact on the overall survival. However, some combinations of the newer cytotoxic agents, as well as combinations of chemotherapeutic agents and targeted biologic anticancer agents, can produce synergistic efficacy with a manageable toxicity profile. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this work were to provide an overview of the currently approved combination regimens available for the treatment of MBC and to consider the clinical data supporting other drug combinations that may supplement the current therapeutic choices in the near future. METHODS: Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, with a focus on combination therapies for the treatment of MBC that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or in Phase III clinical trials. The National Institutes of Health's Clinical Trial Registry was searched for relevant ongoing clinical trials in specific areas. Bibliographies were also searched for additional relevant material. Preference was given to recently published, larger, well-designed clinical trials that influence current prescribing practices. Phase I and II studies, and/or studies older than 10 years (ie, published earlier than 1999), were afforded less emphasis or were disregarded. RESULTS: Combinations of taxanes with capecitabine or gemcitabine, and ixabepilone plus capecitabine, are approved by the FDA as combination regimens for the treatment of MBC. The use of targeted therapies such as trastuzumab, bevacizumab, or lapatinib in combination with taxanes (for the former two) or capecitabine (for lapatinib) is also approved. Several investigational drug combinations are also currently undergoing evaluation in clinical trials, including combinations of bevacizumab and gemcitabine with capecitabine or alternative taxanes. Although results from Phase I and II studies are largely encouraging so far, the data from ongoing Phase III studies will ultimately dictate changes in clinical practice. It seems unlikely that any single agent or combination regimen will emerge as superior in all patients with MBC, given the heterogeneous nature of the disease and patient population. CONCLUSION: New combination regimens for MBC may broaden the range of treatment options currently available to delay disease progression for as long as possible.

The significance of circulating epithelial cells in Breast Cancer patients by a novel negative selection method.

PURPOSE: A negative selection method for the enumeration and characterization of circulating epithelial/cancer cells (CCC) in Breast Cancer (BC) patients is described. This manual procedure yields reproducible results of high sensitivity and selectivity suitable for research laboratories. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective blood sampling study in 105 women with stage 1-4 BC attending clinics at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center to define the prevalence of CCC utilizing our sensitive double gradient centrifugation and magnetic cell sorting CCC detection and enumeration method. CCC were isolated and enumerated from 15 to 20 ml of venous blood drawn before the start of systemic therapy and periodically thereafter for up to 24 months. One or more CCC/sample was considered a positive result. RESULTS: We analyzed 487 samples for the presence of CCC; the median number of samples/patient was 4 (range 1-8). CCC were detected in 56% of patients, 19%-stage 1; 43%-stage 2; 46%-stage 3; 83%-stage 4. The probability of being positive for the presence of CCC is significantly associated with the stage of cancer (P < 0.0001). The frequency of CCC positive patients and samples increased with the advancing stage of disease. Presence of more than 10 CCC/sample was associated with the decreased survival and increased probability of having metastatic disease P = 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing number of CCC/sample correlates with the adverse outcome and poorer survival (P < 0.0001). Our CCC test based on the negative selection procedure may provide valuable prognostic information.