Association between workplace social capital and systolic blood pressure among 23 173 workers at 367 small-sized and medium-sized enterprises in Japan: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Social capital (SC) has been shown to be inversely associated with elevated blood pressure. While SC in the workplace may also be associated with blood pressure, it has not been extensively studied. We aimed to investigate the association between workplace SC and systolic blood pressure (SBP). DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: 367 small-sized and medium-sized companies in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 23 173 participants (15 991 males and 7182 females) aged ≥18 years. EXPOSURE OF INTEREST: SC was assessed using individual responses to eight 4-point Likert questions used in the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. Workplace SC was assessed as the mean of individual-level responses to the SC questions from those working in the same company. OUTCOME MEASURE: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) RESULTS: A multilevel linear regression model revealed that higher workplace-level SC was linked with lower SBP (coef.=-0.53 per 1SD increment in workplace SC, 95% CI=-1.02 to -0.05) among females in the age-adjusted model, which remained statistically significant after adjusting for other covariates. After adjusting for individual-level SC, this association was attenuated and became non-significant (coef.=-0.41, 95% CI=-0.87 to 0.05), while individual-level SC was inversely associated with SBP (coef.=-0.43, 95% CI=-0.73 to -0.13). Among males, we did not find any evidence of significant inverse associations either in relation to workplace SC (coef.=-0.12, 95% CI=-0.46 to 0.21) or individual-level SC (coef.=0.19, 95% CI=-0.01 to 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggested that workplace-level SC can affect SBP differently by sex.

Effects of work-family life support program on the work-family interface and mental health among Japanese dual-earner couples with a preschool child: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effectiveness of a newly developed work-family life support program on the work-family interface and mental health indicators among Japanese dual-earner couples with a preschool child(/ren) using a randomized controlled trial with a waitlist. METHODS: Participants who met the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated to the intervention or the control groups (n = 79 and n = 85, respectively). The program comprised two 3-h sessions with a 1-month interval between them and provided comprehensive skills by including self-management, couple management, and parenting management components. The program sessions were conducted on weekends in a community center room with 3-10 participants. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups. Primary outcomes were work-family balance self-efficacy (WFBSE), four types of work-family spillovers (i.e., work-to-family conflict, family-to-work conflict, work-to-family facilitation, and family-to-work facilitation), psychological distress, and work engagement reported by the participants. RESULTS: The program had significantly pooled intervention effects on WFBSE (P = .031) and psychological distress (P = .014). The effect sizes (Cohen's d) were small, with values of 0.22 at the 1-month follow-up and 0.24 at the 3-month follow-up for WFBSE, and -0.36 at the 3-month follow-up for psychological distress. However, the program had nonsignificant pooled effects on four types of work-family spillovers and work engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The program effectively increased WFBSE and decreased psychological distress among Japanese dual-earner couples with a preschool child(/ren).