Defining the target in cancer of the oesophagus: direct radiotherapy planning with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography.

AIMS: Target definition in radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) of oesophageal cancer is challenging and guided by a combination of diagnostic modalities. This planning study aimed to evaluate the contribution of single positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in the treatment position to RTP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients referred for radiotherapy from April to December 2008 were retrospectively identified. Two sets of target volumes were delineated using the planning CT and the (18)F-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET-CT data sets, respectively. Target volumes were compared in length, volume and geographic conformality. Radiotherapy plans were generated and compared for both data sets. RESULTS: PET-CT planning target volume (PET-CT(PTV)) was larger than the CT target (CT(PTV)) in 12 cases and smaller in seven. The median PTV conformality index was 0.82 (range 0.44-0.98). Radiotherapy plans conforming to normal tissue dose constraints were achieved for both sets of PTV in 16 patients (three patients could not be treated to the prescription dose with either technique due to very large target volumes and significant risk of normal tissue toxicity). Previously undetected locoregional nodal involvement seen on PET-CT in three cases was localised and included in the PTV. In nine cases, the CTPTV plan delivered less than 95% dose to 95% of the PET-CT(PTV), raising concern about potential for geographical miss. CONCLUSION: A single scan with diagnostic PET-CT in the treatment position for RTP allows greater confidence in anatomical localisation and interpretation of biological information. The use of PET-CT may result in larger PTV volumes in selected cases, but did not exclude patients from radical treatment within accepted normal tissue tolerance.

Breast-conserving surgery with intra-operative radiotherapy: the right approach for the 21st century?

Wide local excision followed by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the whole breast has become the standard of care for most patients with localised 'early' breast cancer in the UK, Europe, and the USA. Local relapse rates are low, and overall survival figures have improved during the past decade, with the advent of more effective systemic endocrine- and chemo-therapy. A policy of EBRT for every patient undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) is however associated with a number of practical difficulties, acute radiation side effects and longer term toxicity, all of which detract from the obvious benefits of EBRT. In addition, with a disease as common as early breast cancer and a treatment programme typically requiring sophisticated radiation planning and many fractions of treatment, the policy of BCS plus EBRT has enormous resource implications within departments of oncology, greatly contributing to lengthy pre-treatment delays. For all these reasons, we and others have developed an increasing interest in techniques of partial breast irradiation, with an emphasis in our own Department on the emerging technique of intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT), which we initially employed as a boost to the tumour bed for use in conjunction with EBRT to the whole breast. To test the possibility of replacing the whole of the EBRT 3-6 week programme by a single application of IORT at the time of surgery, we and others have commenced a large scale prospectively randomised clinical trail in selected patients. Nine international centres are currently participating, and 350 patients have now been randomised to receive either IORT as part of the initial surgical excision or conventional EBRT with a pragmatic dose policy according to the preference of the contributing centre. The majority of patients undergoing IORT receive this at the time of initial surgery but it is also permissible within the trial programme to randomise suitable patients after the excised specimen has been histologically examined, thus avoiding any unsuitable patients - for example, those with a lobular carcinoma. These patients will be stratified and assessed separately from the 'pre-pathology' group, whose surgery and IORT is completed within a single session; if the latter patients are found to have unfavourable histology we have the facility, within the trial, to add EBRT. The trial is ongoing and our early experience has been encouraging. We have also recently assessed the long term local failure rate in patients offered IORT as a tumour bed boost, in conjunction with conventional EBRT. This methodology will also be the subject of a future randomised clinical trial.

Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial after completion of 5 years' adjuvant treatment for breast cancer.

The standard adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive localised breast cancer is 5 years of tamoxifen, but recurrences and side-effects restrict its usefulness. The aromatase inhibitor anastrozole was compared with tamoxifen for 5 years in 9366 postmenopausal women with localised breast cancer. After a median follow-up of 68 months, anastrozole significantly prolonged disease-free survival (575 events with anastrozole vs 651 with tamoxifen, hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97, p=0.01) and time-to-recurrence (402 vs 498, 0.79, 0.70-0.90, p=0.0005), and significantly reduced distant metastases (324 vs 375, 0.86, 0.74-0.99, p=0.04) and contralateral breast cancers (35 vs 59, 42% reduction, 12-62, p=0.01). Almost all patients have completed their scheduled treatment, and fewer withdrawals occurred with anastrozole than with tamoxifen. Anastrozole was also associated with fewer side-effects than tamoxifen, especially gynaecological problems and vascular events, but arthralgia and fractures were increased. Anastrozole should be the preferred initial treatment for postmenopausal women with localised hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Recent advances in endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: implications for treatment and prevention.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of advanced breast cancer, third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have shown superior efficacy and tolerability compared with tamoxifen and megestrol acetate, the previous standard endocrine therapies in the first- and second-line settings, respectively. AIs are now being assessed in the adjuvant and prevention settings. DESIGN: Literature review (PubMed search). RESULTS: Tamoxifen is currently the only endocrine option available for adjuvant therapy and chemoprevention in postmenopausal women. However, results from the ATAC ('Arimidex', Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial have shown anastrozole to be more effective than tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer. Other third-generation AIs, including letrozole and exemestane, are also being investigated as adjuvant therapies. In the chemoprevention setting, tamoxifen is the only available endocrine option for women at high risk of breast cancer but, given that these are healthy subjects, is associated with an unacceptable rate of adverse events. Raloxifene is being further assessed in the STAR (Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene) trial, while anastrozole is being evaluated in the second IBIS-II (International Breast Intervention Study II). CONCLUSIONS: AIs, in particular anastrozole, are set to change the way that early breast cancer is treated. Effective and better-tolerated endocrine alternatives for breast cancer prevention may become available in the future.

Laser augmented by brachytherapy versus laser alone in the palliation of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia: a randomised study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with advanced malignant dysphagia are not suitable for definitive treatment. The best option for palliation of dysphagia varies between patients. This paper looks at a simple technique for enhancing laser recanalisation. AIM: To assess the value of adjunctive brachytherapy in prolonging palliation of malignant dysphagia by endoscopic laser therapy. PATIENTS: Twenty two patients with advanced malignant dysphagia due to adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastric cardia, unsuitable for surgery or radical chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Patients able to eat a soft diet after laser recanalisation were randomised to no further therapy or a single treatment with brachytherapy (10 Gy). Results were judged on the quality and duration of dysphagia palliation, need for subsequent intervention, complications, and survival. RESULTS: The median dysphagia score for all patients two weeks after initial treatment was 1 (some solids). The median dysphagia palliated interval from the end of initial treatment to recurrent dysphagia or death increased from five weeks (control group) to 19 weeks (brachytherapy group). Three patients had some odynophagia for up to six weeks after brachytherapy. There was no other treatment related morbidity or mortality. Further intervention was required in 10 of 11 control patients (median five further procedures) compared with 7/11 brachytherapy patients (median two further procedures). There was no difference in survival (median 20 weeks (control), 26 weeks (brachytherapy)). CONCLUSIONS: Laser therapy followed by brachytherapy is a safe, straightforward, and effective option for palliating advanced malignant dysphagia, which is complementary to stent insertion.

Targeted intra-operative radiotherapy (Targit): an innovative method of treatment for early breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We believe that conservative treatment of early breast cancer may not require radiotherapy that encompasses the whole breast. We present here the clinico-pathological basis for this view, as well as a novel therapeutic approach that allows intra-operative radiotherapy to be safely and accurately delivered to the target tissues in a standard operating theatre. THE RATIONALE: Whole-organ analysis of mastectomy specimens reveals that 80% of occult cancer foci are situated remote from the index quadrant. In contrast, over 90% of local recurrences after breast conservative therapy occur near the original tumour, even when radiotherapy is not given. Therefore, the remote occult cancer foci may be clinically irrelevant and radiotherapy to the index quadrant alone might be sufficient. A NOVEL TECHNIQUE: The Photon Radiosurgery System (PRS) is an ingenious portable electron-beam driven device that can typically deliver intra-operative doses of 5-20 Gy, respectively, to 1 cm and 0.2 cm from the tumour bed over about 22 min. The pliable breast tissue--the target--wraps around the source, providing perfect conformal radiotherapy. Being soft X-rays, the dose attenuates rapidly (alpha approximately 1/r3), reducing distant damage. RESULTS: In our pilot study of 25 patients (age 30-80 years, T = 0.42-4.0 cm), we replaced the routine post-operative tumour bed boost with targeted intra-operative radiotherapy. There have been no major complications and no patient has developed local recurrence, although the median follow-up time is short, at 24 months. CONCLUSION: It is safe and feasible to deliver targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (Targit) for early breast cancer. We have begun a randomised trial--the first of its kind--comparing Targit with conventional six-week course of radiotherapy. If proven equivalent in terms of local recurrence and cosmesis, it could eliminate the need for the usual six-week course of post-operative radiotherapy.

The effect of anastrozole on the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen in post-menopausal women with early breast cancer.

Thirty-four post-menopausal women with early breast cancer who had received 20 mg tamoxifen once daily as adjuvant therapy for at least 10 weeks participated in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial. The primary aim of the trial was to determine the effect of anastrozole upon tamoxifen pharmacokinetics, with secondary aims of assessing the tolerability of the two drugs in combination and whether or not tamoxifen had any effect upon the oestradiol suppression seen with anastrozole. Patients were randomized to receive either 1 mg anastrozole (16 patients) or matching placebo (18 patients) once daily on a double-blind basis for 28 days. No significant difference (P = 0.919) was observed in serum tamoxifen concentrations between the anastrozole and placebo groups during the trial. The serum concentration of oestradiol was significantly suppressed (P < 0.0001) in patients co-administered anastrozole compared with placebo in the presence of tamoxifen, confirming that anastrozole remained an effective suppressant of oestradiol in the presence of tamoxifen. The combination of tamoxifen and anastrozole was well tolerated, with very little difference in side-effects reported between anastrozole and placebo. In conclusion, the results of this study confirm that anastrozole does not affect the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen when the two drugs are given in combination to post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. In addition, the oestradiol suppressant effects of anastrozole appear unaffected by tamoxifen.

A lesson in the management of testicular cancer in a patient with a solitary testis.

Five per cent of patients with germ cell tumours of the testis will develop a further tumour in the contralateral testis. Standard treatment in such cases is a second orchidectomy, resulting in infertility, hormone replacement, and psychological morbidity. In this case report we explore the role of testis conservation in these patients and also show that there is a risk of removing a potentially normal testis if a histological diagnosis is not sought prior to orchidectomy.