Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 145(14): 2991-2997, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28803563

ABSTRACT

Salmonella causes an estimated 1·2 million illnesses annually in the USA. Salmonella enterica serotype Javiana (serotype Javiana) is the fourth most common serotype isolated from humans, with the majority of illnesses occurring in southeastern states. The percentage of wetland cover by wetland type and the average incidence rates of serotype Javiana infection in selected counties of the Foodborne Disease Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) were examined. This analysis explored the relationship between wetland environments and incidence in order to assess whether regional differences in environmental habitats may be associated with observed variations in incidence. Findings suggest that environmental habitats may support reservoirs or contribute to the persistence of serotype Javiana, and may frequently contribute to the transmission of infection compared with other Salmonella serotypes.


Subject(s)
Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Salmonella enterica/physiology , Wetlands , Humans , Incidence , Salmonella Infections/microbiology , Salmonella enterica/genetics , Serogroup , United States/epidemiology
2.
J Food Prot ; 78(1): 187-95, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25581195

ABSTRACT

Surveillance data indicate that handling of food by an ill worker is a cause of almost half of all restaurant-related outbreaks. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code contains recommendations for food service establishments, including restaurants, aimed at reducing the frequency with which food workers work while ill. However, few data exist on the extent to which restaurants have implemented FDA recommendations. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Environmental Health Specialists Network (EHS-Net) conducted a study on the topic of ill food workers in restaurants. We interviewed restaurant managers (n = 426) in nine EHS-Net sites. We found that many restaurant policies concerning ill food workers do not follow FDA recommendations. For example, one-third of the restaurants' policies did not specifically address the circumstances under which ill food workers should be excluded from work (i.e., not be allowed to work). We also found that, in many restaurants, managers are not actively involved in decisions about whether ill food workers should work. Additionally, almost 70% of managers said they had worked while ill; 10% said they had worked while having nausea or "stomach flu," possible symptoms of foodborne illness. When asked why they had worked when ill, a third of the managers said they felt obligated to work or their strong work ethic compelled them to work. Other reasons cited were that the restaurant was understaffed or no one was available to replace them (26%), they felt that their symptoms were mild or not contagious (19%), they had special managerial responsibilities that no one else could fulfill (11%), there was non-food handling work they could do (7%), and they would not get paid if they did not work or the restaurant had no sick leave policy (5%). Data from this study can inform future research and help policy makers target interventions designed to reduce the frequency with which food workers work while ill.


Subject(s)
Food Handling/standards , Occupational Health/standards , Personnel Management/standards , Restaurants/standards , Adult , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Disease Outbreaks , Food Contamination/analysis , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Foodborne Diseases/etiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Sick Leave , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Workforce
3.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 61(7): 492-8, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24484079

ABSTRACT

We describe multiple-aetiology infections involving non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) identified through laboratory-based surveillance in nine FoodNet sites from 2001 to 2010. A multiple-aetiology infection (MEI) was defined as isolation of non-O157 STEC and laboratory evidence of any of the other nine pathogens under surveillance or isolation of >1 non-O157 STEC serogroup from the same person within a 7-day period. We compared exposures of patients with MEI during 2001-2010 with those of patients with single-aetiology non-O157 STEC infections (SEI) during 2008-2009 and with those of the FoodNet population from a survey conducted during 2006-2007. In total, 1870 non-O157 STEC infections were reported; 68 (3.6%) were MEI; 60 included pathogens other than non-O157 STEC; and eight involved >1 serogroup of non-O157 STEC. Of the 68 MEI, 21 (31%) were part of six outbreaks. STEC O111 was isolated in 44% of all MEI. Of patients with MEI, 50% had contact with farm animals compared with 29% (P < 0.01) of persons with SEI; this difference was driven by infections involving STEC O111. More patients with non-outbreak-associated MEI reported drinking well water (62%) than respondents in a population survey (19%) (P < 0.01). Drinking well water and having contact with animals may be important exposures for MEI, especially those involving STEC O111.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/etiology , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli , Zoonoses/etiology , Zoonoses/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Animals, Domestic/microbiology , Campylobacter Infections/etiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cryptosporidiosis/etiology , Escherichia coli O157/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , Salmonella Infections/etiology , Shiga Toxin/isolation & purification , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult , Zoonoses/epidemiology
4.
J Food Prot ; 74(6): 949-53, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21669072

ABSTRACT

Listeriosis is a severe infection caused by Listeria monocytogenes. Since 2004, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has requested that listeriosis patients be interviewed using a standardized Listeria Initiative (LI) questionnaire. In January 2009, states and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention began investigating a multistate outbreak of listeriosis among pregnant, Hispanic women. We defined a case as an illness occurring between October 2008 and March 2009 with an L. monocytogenes isolate indistinguishable from the outbreak strain by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. We conducted a multistate case-control study using controls that were selected from L. monocytogenes illnesses in non-outbreak-related pregnant, Hispanic women that were reported to the LI during 2004 to 2008. Eight cases in five states were identified. Seven of these were pregnant, Hispanic females aged 21 to 43 years, and one was a 3-year-old Hispanic girl, who was excluded from the study. Seven (100%) cases but only 26 (60%) of 43 controls had consumed Mexican-style cheese in the month before illness (odds ratio, 5.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to ∞; P = 0.04). Cultures of asadero cheese made from pasteurized milk collected at a manufacturing facility during routine sampling by the Michigan Department of Agriculture on 23 February 2009 yielded the outbreak strain, leading to a recall of cheeses produced in the plant. Recalled product was traced to stores where at least three of the women had purchased cheese. This investigation highlights the usefulness of routine product sampling for identifying contaminated foods, of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis to detect multistate outbreaks, and of the LI for providing timely exposure information for case-control analyses. Recalls of contaminated cheeses likely prevented additional illnesses.


Subject(s)
Cheese/microbiology , Food Contamination/analysis , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Listeriosis/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Disease Outbreaks , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Female , Foodborne Diseases/prevention & control , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Listeriosis/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Product Recalls and Withdrawals , Young Adult
5.
Epidemiol Infect ; 138(3): 340-6, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19723360

ABSTRACT

From 1996 to 2004, the incidence of Salmonella Javiana infections increased in FoodNet, the U.S. national active foodborne disease surveillance programme. Contact with amphibians and consumption of tomatoes have been associated with outbreaks of S. Javiana infection. To generate and test hypotheses about risk factors associated with sporadic S. Javiana infections, we interviewed patients with laboratory-confirmed S. Javiana infection identified in Georgia and Tennessee during August-October 2004. We collected data on food and water consumption, animal contact, and environmental exposure from cases. Responses were compared with population-based survey exposure data. Seventy-two of 117 identified S. Javiana case-patients were interviewed. Consumption of well water [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-11.2] and reptile or amphibian contact (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-7.1) were associated with infection. Consumption of tomatoes (aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9) and poultry (aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-1.0) were protective. Our study suggests that environmental factors are associated with S. Javiana infections in Georgia and Tennessee.


Subject(s)
Food Microbiology , Salmonella enterica/classification , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification , Water Microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Amphibians , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Solanum lycopersicum/microbiology , Male , Odds Ratio , Poultry/microbiology , Reptiles , Serotyping , Tennessee/epidemiology , Young Adult
6.
Epidemiol Infect ; 137(12): 1674-8, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19366491

ABSTRACT

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has rapidly emerged in the USA as a cause of severe infections in previously healthy persons without traditional risk factors. We describe the epidemiology of severe CA-MRSA disease in the state of Georgia, USA and analyse the risk of death associated with three different clinical syndromes of CA-MRSA disease - pneumonia, invasive disease, and skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs). A total of 1670 cases of severe CA-MRSA disease were reported during 2005-2007. The case-fatality rate was 3.4%; sex and race of fatal and non-fatal cases did not differ significantly. While CA-MRSA pneumonia and invasive disease were less common than SSTIs, they were about 15 times more likely to result in death [risk ratio 16.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10.28-27.07 and 13.98, 95% CI 7.74-25.27, respectively]. When controlling for age and the presence of other clinical syndromes the odds of death in patients manifesting specific severe CA-MRSA syndromes was highest in those with pneumonia (odds ratio 11.34). Possible risk factors for severe CA-MRSA SSTI and pneumonia included the draining of lesions without medical assistance and an antecedent influenza-like illness.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Female , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...