Utilization of Serial Next-Generation Sequencing Among Patients Receiving CPX-351 for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The phase III trial that led to the approval of CPX-351 for treating secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) in 2017 did not study the effect of specific mutations on outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study was done to evaluate the effect of next-generation sequencing (NGS) results at the time of best response and before allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) in patients treated with CPX-351 as frontline therapy for sAML between 2017 and 2021. RESULTS: The most common mutations seen were DNMT3A (n = 17, 29.8%), SRSF2 (n = 13, 22.8%), RUNX1 (n = 13, 22.8%), TET2 (n = 9, 15.8%), ASXL1 (n = 9, 15.8%), and BCOR (n = 9, 15.8%). Median OS (mOS) for the entire cohort was 47 months. Though 64.7% patients cleared the DNMT3A mutation, only 44.4% and 22.2% of patients cleared the TET2 and ASXL1 mutations, respectively. The mOS for patients who cleared their mutations vs. for those who did not was not significantly longer (46 vs. 30 months; P = .991). The relapse-free survival (RFS) for patients who cleared mutations was numerically longer compared to those who had persistent mutations; however, this did not reach statistical significance (44 months vs. 26 months; P = .786). CONCLUSION: This is the first study reporting NGS at best response and before alloSCT and its effect on OS and RFS. We found that OS and RFS were numerically longer among patients who cleared mutations; however, this did not reach statistical significance. In addition, alloSCT led to improved RFS irrespective of mutational clearance.

New and emerging therapies for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Approximately 40% of patients with DLBCL will experience disease relapse or will be refractory to first line chemoimmunotherapy, necessitating second-line salvage therapy. This has historically consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with curative intent for transplant-eligible patients or palliative chemotherapy for transplant-ineligible patients. In recent years there have been several new therapeutic agents approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL, thereby expanding the therapeutic landscape. These agents include polatuzumab vedotin, tafasitamab, loncastuximab tesirine, selinexor, and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies such as axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel. This review summarizes the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, dosing, and administration of new agents recently approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Safety and financial analysis of outpatient dose-adjusted EPOCH for B-cell lymphoma at a tertiary comprehensive cancer center.

INTRODUCTION: Dose-adjusted (DA-) EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) is a front-line treatment option for aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Due to regimen complexity, inpatient administration of DA-EPOCH has been historically required. Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) developed an Inpatient/Outpatient (IPOP) program to facilitate administration of complicated regimens in the outpatient setting. We hypothesized that outpatient administration of DA-EPOCH at a comprehensive cancer center is both safe and cost-effective. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective chart review including B-cell lymphoma patients who were 18 years or older and who had received DA-EPOCH at MCC from April 26, 2017 through August 10, 2019. The primary endpoint was hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy administration. Additional safety endpoints included hospitalizations between cycles, infectious complications, extravasations, drug spills, pump-malfunctions, and drug-related adverse events. Financial analysis included drug cost, resource utilization, and impact of hospital bed backfill. RESULTS: 56 patients received 219 cycles of DA-EPOCH with 193 cycles administered outpatient. Zero patients required hospitalization during outpatient administration of DA-EPOCH, resulting in 965 saved hospital days. 23 patients (41%) were hospitalized between cycles, most commonly due to neutropenic fever (52%). No extravasations were documented throughout the study period. There were few incidences of drug spills or pump malfunctions. Based on current regimen utilization, the annual transition of 84 cycles of DA-EPOCH to the outpatient setting has a positive impact on margin of $1,444,548. CONCLUSIONS: Routine outpatient administration of DA-EPOCH is both safe and feasible with a positive annual impact on margin of $1,444,548 at a comprehensive cancer center.