The Immunogenicity and Safety Profile for KM-248, a Combined Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine, and Its Noninferiority to the Measles Vaccine in Healthy Japanese Children: a Phase 3 Randomized Multicenter Single-Blind Clinical Trial.

The domestic combined measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine was withdrawn in Japan in 1993 following an outbreak of aseptic meningitis attributed to the mumps component of the cocktail. KM-248 is an MMR vaccine (M-M-R®II), manufactured by Merck & Co., Inc. (Kenilworth, NJ, USA) and registered and approved in 74 countries, but which has not been approved in Japan. This multicenter, randomized, single-blind study, was designed to evaluate the noninferiority of the KM-248 measles component in terms of immunogenicity when compared to the control measles vaccine already approved in Japan and the seroconversion rates for these three viruses following KM-248 administration. Vaccination with KM-248 in children aged 12-90 months (n = 178) induced robust immune responses to measles, mumps, and rubella viruses. The seroconversion rate for the measles virus by the measles component of KM-248 (n = 172) was shown to be non-inferior to that of the control measles vaccine (n = 85). No serious adverse reactions, such as aseptic meningitis or anaphylaxis, were observed. Fever is one of the most common adverse reactions associated with vaccination and was observed in approximately half of the participants. KM-248 administered to healthy Japanese children aged between 12 and 90 months demonstrated a comparable safety and efficacy profile to the control vaccine.

A clinical phase I study of an EB66 cell-derived H5N1 pandemic vaccine adjuvanted with AS03.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I clinical trial of a cell culture-derived AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine containing HA antigen (A/Indonesia/05/2005(H5N1)/PR8-IBCDC-RG2) derived from EB66 cells (KD-295). METHODS: Healthy male adult volunteers (20-40 years old, N=60) enrolled in the study were divided into 3 groups, the MA group (3.8 µg of HA+AS03), HA group (7.5 µg of HA+AS03), and 1/2 MA group (half the volume of the MA group), and received KD-295 intramuscularly twice with a 21-day interval. After administration of KD-295, adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters, and immune response to the vaccine strain and heterologous virus strains were evaluated. RESULTS: No severe adverse events leading to discontinuation of vaccine administration occurred. The vaccine was well-tolerated. There was no dose dependency in the rate, timing, or duration of the adverse events. Immunogenicity of the vaccines was evaluated by HI (hemagglutination inhibition) assay, which confirmed that the antibody response to the vaccine strain and heterologous strain in all groups met the three criteria for immunogenicity described in the Japanese guidelines for development of a pandemic prototype vaccine. We also measured the neutralizing antibody titers against several virus strains, and confirmed a significant rise in antibody levels to both the vaccine strain and heterologous strains. CONCLUSION: The EB66-derived H5N1 influenza vaccine adjuvanted with AS03 elicited a broad cross-reactive antibody response among H5N1 strains with acceptable reactogenicity. Therefore, KD-295 can be considered a useful pandemic and pre-pandemic influenza vaccine candidate.

Immunogenicity of an inactivated adjuvanted whole-virion influenza A (H5N1, NIBRG-14) vaccine administered by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection.

The immunogenicity and safety profile of an inactivated whole-virion influenza A (H5N1, NIBRG-14) vaccine with alum adjuvant that was administered by IM or SC injection in a phase I clinical study involving 120 healthy Japanese men aged 20-40 years is described. The serological response of the IM group was stronger than that of the SC group. Local adverse events were less severe with IM injection than with SC injection, while similar systemic adverse events were seen in both groups. These results indicate that, when administering an inactivated whole virion vaccine with alum adjuvant for pandemic influenza, IM injection may achieve better immunogenicity and safety than SC injection.