Effect of radiotherapy interruptions on survival in medicare enrollees with local and regional head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether interruptions in radiotherapy are associated with decreased survival in a population-based sample of head-and-neck cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database we identified Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years and older diagnosed with local-regional head-and-neck cancer during the period 1997-2003. We examined claims records of 3864 patients completing radiotherapy for the presence of one or more 5-30-day interruption(s) in therapy. We then performed Cox regression analyses to estimate the association between therapy interruptions and survival. RESULTS: Patients with laryngeal tumors who experienced an interruption in radiotherapy had a 68% (95% confidence interval, 41-200%) increased risk of death, compared with patients with no interruptions. Patients with nasal cavity, nasopharynx, oral, salivary gland, and sinus tumors had similar associations between interruptions and increased risk of death, but these did not reach statistical significance because of small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment interruptions seem to influence survival time among patients with laryngeal tumors completing a full course of radiotherapy. At all head-and-neck sites, the association between interruptions and survival is sensitive to confounding by stage and other treatments. Further research is needed to develop methods to identify patients most susceptible to interruption-induced mortality.

Discontinuation of radiation treatment among medicaid-enrolled women with local and regional stage breast cancer.

For women with nonmetastatic breast cancer, radiation therapy is recommended as a necessary component of the breast conserving surgery (BCS) treatment option. The degree to which Medicaid-enrolled women complete recommended radiation therapy protocols is not known. We evaluate radiation treatment completion rates for Medicaid enrollees aged 18-64 diagnosed with breast cancer. We determine clinical and socio-demographic factors associated with not starting treatment, and with interruptions or not completing radiation treatment. Using data from the Washington State Cancer Registry linked to Medicaid enrollment and claims records, we identified Medicaid enrollees diagnosed with breast cancer from 1997 to 2003 who received BCS. Among the 402 women who met inclusion criteria, 105 (26%) did not receive any radiation. Factors significantly associated with not receiving radiation included in situ disease and non-English as a primary language. Among those who received at least one radiation treatment, 65 (22%) failed to complete therapy and 71 (24%) patients had at least one 5 to 30 day gap in treatment. We found no significant predictors of interruptions in treatment or early discontinuation. A substantial proportion of Medicaid-insured women who are eligible for radiation therapy following BCS either fail to receive any treatment, experience significant interruptions during therapy, or do not complete a minimum course of treatment. More effort is needed to ensure this vulnerable population receives adequate radiation following BCS.

Completion of radiotherapy for local and regional head and neck cancer in medicare.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with interruption or early discontinuation of treatment in patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, because it is believed that such treatment interruption or early discontinuation increases the risk of disease relapse and adversely influences survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database, we identified Medicare beneficiaries 66 years or older who were diagnosed as having local or regional head and neck cancer from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2003. For each case, we calculated the timing and duration of radiotherapy using Medicare claims data. We then performed logistic regression analyses to estimate the association between tumor and clinical characteristics and early discontinuation of and/or interruptions in radiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Completion of uninterrupted radiotherapy. RESULTS: A substantial proportion of patients (39.8% overall) had interruptions in radiotherapy and/or incomplete therapy. Altogether, 70.4% of surgical patients completed radiotherapy with no interruptions compared with 52.0% of nonsurgical patients (chi(2) = 78.17; P < .001). Surgery was associated with an increased likelihood of completing uninterrupted radiotherapy for all tumor sites. Comorbidity, chemotherapy, and regional disease were all associated with a decreased likelihood of completing radiotherapy at a subset of sites. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to complete uninterrupted radiotherapy is common among Medicare enrollees with head and neck cancer. Surgery before radiotherapy is associated with an increased likelihood of completing radiotherapy. At a subset of sites, chemotherapy is associated with a decreased likelihood of completing radiotherapy. Further research is needed to identify factors associated with noncompletion of radiotherapy among nonsurgical patients and patients who receive chemotherapy.

Second-line and third-line chemotherapy for lung cancer: use and cost.

OBJECTIVES: To identify commonly prescribed first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy regimens for persons with lung cancer and to evaluate the utilization patterns and costs of care associated with receiving these regimens. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. METHODS: Using health insurance claims from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2006, patients with lung cancer were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. An algorithm was developed to identify first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by the number of discrete regimens received or by their specific chemotherapy agent or combination of agents. Data were analyzed for up to 2 years from the date of the initial first-line regimen and for 1 year from the second and third lines. Patient costs were based on total reimbursements for each group during the observation period. RESULTS: Of patients receiving first-line chemotherapy, 25% and 10% received second-line and third-line chemotherapy, respectively. Docetaxel, gefitinib, and erlotinib hydrochloride were the most commonly prescribed second-line regimens; gefitinib and docetaxel were the most commonly prescribed third-line regimens. The most commonly prescribed second- and third-line agents changed substantially over time. Total costs and costs per patient per month increased as the number of lines of chemotherapy prescribed increased. CONCLUSIONS: Second- and third-line chemotherapy is prescribed infrequently, and patterns of prescribing are changing over time. Direct medical care costs increase substantially with additional lines of therapy.