The use of telescoping guide catheters for coronary sinus cannulation and sub-selecting tributaries in left ventricular lead placement.

INTRODUCTION: Failure to enter the coronary sinus (CS) with a guiding catheter and entering its tributaries remains challenging in left ventricle (LV) pacing lead implants for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). A dual telescoping catheter system (8F outer/6F inner) is designed to provide the ability to adjust the catheter curve size, shape and/or reach to the patients' anatomy avoiding the need for catheter change. METHODS: Five different designs for CS cannulation were randomly tested in 64 patients scheduled for CRT device implant. RESULTS: In 33 consecutive patients three adaptable telescoping guiding catheter systems were tested per patient, the adaptable catheters had higher overall cannulation success rates (68, 63 and 62%) compared to the fixed shape catheter (46%) and an greater cannulation success rate when the CS location was not known (70, 53 and 72% vs 33% for the fixed shape). In a second group of 31 CRT patients the two telescoping catheters had similar high levels of success (71-80%), with or without using the inner catheter. CONCLUSIONS: The telescopic system is adaptable to a wide range of anatomical variations in patients and can result in a higher CS cannulation success rate due to its adjustability in the RA in search for the CS ostium. On top of this the inner catheter allows for sub-selecting the CS tributaries.

Comparison of stimulation sites within left ventricular veins on the acute hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to study the acute hemodynamic effect of left ventricular (LV) stimulation sites within a coronary vein. BACKGROUND: Access to LV stimulation sites for resynchronization therapy is achieved using specialized lead systems navigated through a coronary vein. The effects of stimulation in different coronary veins have been evaluated previously, but less is known about stimulation sites within a coronary vein. METHODS: Twenty-four patients (New York Heart Association functional class II-IV, age 59 +/- 10 years, ejection fraction 21 +/- 7%, QRS 166 +/- 30 ms) were enrolled in the study. A novel over-the-wire lead system was used to access an anterior or lateral coronary vein. At each lead location, a randomized stimulation protocol was executed. Hemodynamic responses were evaluated using LV dP/dtmax. RESULTS: The mean time to cannulate the coronary sinus and position the LV lead was 19 +/- 30 minutes and 17 +/- 18 minutes, respectively. Data from stimulation at two sites within a coronary vein were obtained in 19 patients (anterior vein 11; lateral vein 8). Of these patients, 14 (anterior vein 9; lateral vein 5) showed large improvement in dP/dtmax (22%-25% in anterior vein, 37%-40% in lateral vein). Overall, there were no group differences in hemodynamic effects among different stimulation sites within a coronary vein, although significant variability among sites was observed in individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Resynchronization therapy through a coronary vein improves acute hemodynamic function of heart failure patients with LV conduction disorder. There were no significant differences between basal and apical pacing sites for this group.

Comparative prospective randomized efficacy testing of different guiding catheters for coronary sinus cannulation in heart failure patients.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of different shapes of guiding catheters for coronary sinus (CS) cannulation was evaluated at implant of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device that required transvenous placement of a pacing lead in a coronary vein on the left ventricle. METHODS AND RESULTS: Comparative testing of 5 different guiding catheter shapes was attempted in 29 consecutive patients. Four newer guiding catheters were tested in a prospective randomized manner with a reference standard catheter always tested in the last place. All of the new catheters included a distal shape that consisted of a single curve or a compound set of curves at the catheter tip, followed by a catheter shaft design which fell into one of two classes: (1). straight shaft catheters and (2). curved shaft catheters. The curved shaft class of catheters, two new and one standard, achieved higher (16/23 (70%), 17/23 (74%) and 17/22 (77%)) CS cannulation success rates than the straight shaft class catheters ((13/23 (56%) and 12/23 (52%)). The pairing of two catheters, one from each class in a single patient, or both from the curved shaft class resulted in a combined CS cannulation success rate of up to 96%. Two of the catheters were more effective from a left hand insertion than from a right hand insertion site. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to switch between guiding catheters with different shapes and compound curves can improve the CS cannulation success rate. The selection of guiding catheters should be influenced by the intended use of the catheter either from the left or from the right hand side.

Left ventricular resynchronization therapy in a canine model of left bundle branch block.

Positive responses to left (LV) and biventricular (BV) stimulation observed in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) suggest a possible mechanism of LV resynchronization. An anesthetized canine LBBB model was developed using radio frequency ablation. Before and after ablation, LV pressure derivative over time (dP/dt) and aortic pulse pressure (PP) were assessed during normal sinus rhythm with right ventricle (RV), LV, or BV stimulation combined with four atrioventricular delays in six dogs. In three more dogs, M-mode echocardiograms of septal and LV posterior wall motion were obtained before and after LBBB and during LV stimulation. LBBB caused QRS widening and hemodynamics deterioration. Before ablation, stimulation alone worsened LV dP/dt and PP. After ablation, LV and BV stimulation maximally increased LV dP/dt by 16% and PP by 7% (P < 0.001), whereas little improvement was observed during RV stimulation. M-mode echocardiogram showed that LBBB resulted in a paradoxical septal wall motion that was corrected by LV stimulation. In conclusion, LV and BV stimulation improved cardiac function in a canine LBBB model via resynchronization of LV excitation and contraction.