Fear of negative evaluation and intolerance of uncertainty: Assessing potential internalizing correlates of eating disorder-related clinical impairment and differences across diagnostic presentations.

The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Internalizing Dimensions for Eating Disorders model positions eating disorder (ED) symptoms on an internalizing dimension alongside anxiety and mood symptoms. Symptom dimensions falling under the internalizing subfactors of distress (e.g., social anxiety) and fear/avoidance (e.g., panic, compulsions, checking) may differentially guide treatment. We examined relations between fear of negative evaluation and intolerance of uncertainty (core features of social anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder, respectively) and ED-related impairment and potential diagnostic differences. We hypothesized that: (a) fear of negative evaluation and intolerance of uncertainty would be related to ED-related impairment, (b) the relation between fear of negative evaluation and impairment would be strongest among individuals with "binge-eating syndromes" (i.e., bulimia nervosa [BN], binge-eating disorder [BED]), and (c) the relation between intolerance of uncertainty and impairment would be strongest among individuals with "weight-phobic syndromes" (i.e., anorexia nervosa [AN], BN, atypical AN). Participants (N = 236) included children/adolescents and adults evaluated for outpatient ED treatment. Participants completed questionnaires and semi-structured diagnostic interviews. Greater fear of negative evaluation and greater intolerance of uncertainty were related to greater clinical impairment, and the strength of these relations depended on ED diagnosis. Fear of negative evaluation was related to impairment among individuals with AN and atypical AN, and intolerance of uncertainty was related to impairment for individuals with AN, BN, and atypical AN. We identified fear of negative evaluation and intolerance of uncertainty as correlates of clinical impairment, highlighting the potential utility of developing treatments to target these internalizing constructs, especially for individuals with weight-phobic syndromes.

Health literacy and eating disorder pathology in women with food insecurity: A preliminary cross-sectional study.

Food insecurity (FI), or limited consistent access to food, is associated with eating disorder (ED) pathology; however, the underlying mechanisms of this relationship remain unclear. Health literacy, or the ability to comprehend and apply health-related information to decision making, is linked to FI and has implications for outcomes across a broad range of diagnoses. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between health literacy and ED symptoms in a sample of 99 women with FI. Linear regression tested cross-sectional associations between scores on The Newest Vital Sign (NVS), a measure of health literacy, and scores on the Eating Pathology Symptom Inventory (EPSI) and behaviors reported in the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview (EDDI). Logistic regression examined the likelihood of ED diagnosis in relation to NVS score. The sample mean (SD) age was 40.3 (14.3) years, and participants self-identified as 54.5 % White, 30.3 % Black, and 13.8 % other. Respondents self-reported 13.1 % marginal, 28.3 % low, and 58.6 % very low food security. Mean NVS score was 4.45, and significantly higher for White compared to Black individuals (F = 3.96, p = .02, η2 = 0.76), but not between other groups. No difference in NVS score by FI status was observed. EPSI Body Dissatisfaction was positively associated with NVS score. No associations were found between remaining EPSI subscales, eating behaviors, or ED diagnosis. White women, but not other groups, were found to have significant negative relationship between NVS and EPSI restricting. Future longitudinal research including components of health literacy related to eating in individuals with FI is warranted.

Comorbid eating, depressive, and anxiety psychopathology is associated with elevated shame in women with food insecurity.

OBJECTIVE: To compare participants with current food insecurity and different psychopathology profiles on shame, guilt, anxiety, and depression using a cross-sectional design. METHOD: Women with current food insecurity (n = 99; 54% White) were placed into four groups based on their endorsement of symptoms of psychopathology: eating disorder with depression/anxiety comorbidity (ED-C group; n = 17), depression/anxiety only (Depression/anxiety group; n = 34), eating disorder only (ED group; n = 12), and No-diagnosis group (n = 36). Groups were compared on self-report measures of shame, guilt, depression, and anxiety using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: The presence of an eating disorder was associated with quadruple the risk of screening positive for comorbid depression and anxiety. The ED-C group reported elevated shame relative to the ED and No-diagnosis groups. The ED-C group reported the highest levels of anxiety, followed by the Depression/anxiety group, and the ED and No-diagnosis groups. DISCUSSION: The presence of an eating disorder with comorbidity among women with food insecurity is associated with heightened shame. Given shame's status as a transdiagnostic predictor of psychopathology, it may serve as a putative mechanism underlying the relationship between food insecurity and eating disorder comorbidity. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Women with food insecurity and an ED were more likely to also screen positive for depression and/or anxiety than women with food insecurity and no ED. Overlap between ED, depression, and anxiety was associated with elevated shame, a harmful, maladaptive emotion with negative psychosocial consequences.