Abundance and phosphorylation state of translation initiation factors in mammary glands of lactating and nonlactating dairy cows.

To test if control of mRNA translation is involved in the increase in protein synthesis by mammary glands during lactation, cellular contents and phosphorylation states of translation factors and their upstream regulators were measured in mammary parenchyma from 12 nonpregnant dairy cows. For a 42-d period, 6 cows in late lactation continued to be milked (L) and 6 at the same stage of lactation were dried off (NL). All cows were then slaughtered and mammary glands and tissue samples obtained. Alveoli and lobules tended to be larger in L cows. Mammary parenchymal mass, cell number, cell size, and RNA, DNA, and protein contents were greater in L cows. Increases (3.1- and 1.8-fold) in the abundance of active, phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 and its kinase, S6K1, respectively, in L vs. NL parenchyma indicated an ability to sustain greater rates of synthesis of translational machinery, which was also evident in the 102% increase in parenchymal RNA:DNA between the 2 groups. Cellular abundances of the main eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIF), eIF2 and eIF4E, were 2.6- and 3-fold greater, respectively, in L cows. That these differences were greater than the 102% greater RNA:DNA in L mammary parenchyma suggests an elevated translational efficiency in L glands. Abundance of phosphorylated rpS6 was not different between mammary parenchyma and liver, whereas eIF2alpha was 50% greater in mammary tissue. In semimembranosus muscle, abundances of phosphorylated rpS6 and eIF2alpha were 3 to 4 times lower than in mammary parenchyma. In both L and NL mammary glands, 11% of eIF2alpha was in the inhibitory, phosphorylated form and 48 to 60% of eIF4E was complexed with its binding protein, 4EBP1. It is concluded that up-regulation of initiation of mRNA translation occurs in the fully differentiated milk secretory cell and that, where crucial initiation factors are not present in a maximally active form, the initiation rate might be flexible in response to external stimuli.

Energy expenditure of Angora bucks in peak breeding season estimated with the doubly-labeled water technique.

We used the doubly-labeled water (DLW; 2H2(18)O) method to compare total energy expenditure (TEE) of Angora bucks and wethers over a 15-d period during peak breeding season. Four bucks (57+/-3 kg) and four wethers (45+/-2 kg) were fitted with marking harnesses to measure sexual activity and allocated pairwise to one of four breeding groups (n = 30 does/group). Subjects were infused i.v. with 2H2(18O) that provided 200 mg 2H2O and 250 mg H2(18)O/kg BW. Blood samples were collected over a 15-d period, with 3- to 4-d intervals for isotope enrichment measurements. Total DLW-derived energy expenditure (TEE) was similar (P = .55) between bucks and wethers (2,578 vs 2,365; SE 239 kcal/d). Large variation was observed among wethers in TEE, courtship, and attempted mountings. Total energy expended corrected for that in mohair production (CTEE) tended (P = .09) to be greater in sexually active wethers (133+/-8 kcal ME/[kg BW.75 x d(-1)]; n = 3) than in bucks (110+/-7 kcal ME/[kg BW.75 x d(-1)]; n = 4). Energy expended on activity (EEa) by these wethers was highly correlated (r = .98) with the number of does marked, which may explain high variability among wethers in EEa. Bucks marked more does (18+/-1; P < .05) than wethers (8+/-3), but a weak relationship (r = .36) existed between number of does marked and EEa, suggesting individuality in style and persistence while courting. In Angora bucks, CTEE during the breeding season was 9% greater than the maintenance energy requirement. In conclusion, breeding activities in single-buck breeding groups did not markedly increase energy requirements of Angora bucks.

Adrenocortical response to ACTH in Angora and Spanish goat wethers.

Angora goats do not cope well with stress compared with goats of other breeds. Our hypothesis that this involves subclinical primary hypoadrenocorticism associated with low cortisol release in response to ACTH stimulation was tested by measuring adrenocortical response (plasma cortisol) in six Spanish (37 +/- 2 kg BW) and six Angora wethers (39 +/- 3 kg BW) under simulated acute and chronic ACTH challenges. In Exp. 1 (acute ACTH challenge), wethers were dosed i.v. with high (2.5 IU/kg BW) or low (.4 IU/kg BW) quantities of ACTH. In Exp. 2 (chronic ACTH challenge), ACTH at the rate of .015 IU/(kg BW x min) or saline (.15 M NaCl) was infused i.v. at 15 mL/h for 6 h. The mean baseline plasma cortisol concentration before ACTH stimulation was similar (P > .05) between Angora and Spanish goats in Exp. 1 (averaged over days) and in Exp. 2. The cortisol concentration response area (ng/ (mL x min) x 10(-3)) above the baseline was similar (P > .05) between Angora and Spanish goats during low (7.6 +/- .5 and 9.0 +/- 1.7, respectively) and high (12.8 +/- 1.0 and 16.0 +/- 1.8, respectively) levels of acute ACTH challenge (Exp. 1) and during chronic ACTH challenge (45.1 +/- 5.9 and 41.8 +/- 7.3, respectively; Exp. 2). In conclusion, these data indicate that, under the conditions of this study, adrenocortical responsiveness to ACTH stimulation is not different between Angora and Spanish goat wethers and, thus, may not contribute to stress susceptibility in Angora goats.