ABSTRACT
Introducción: La escisión total del mesorrecto transanal (TaTME) es una técnica quirúrgica moderna que busca mejorar los resultados oncológicos sorteando dificultades anatómicas y propias del tumor en el cáncer de recto medio e inferior. La expansión de esta operación condujo a complicaciones propias que no se observaban con los procedimientos tradicionales puramente transabdominales. Es por esto que existen recomendaciones de expertos a seguir en el inicio de la práctica del TaTME. Objetivo: Mostrar resultados en la serie inicial de TaTME implementando estrategias de seguridad. Diseño: Análisis retrospectivo sobre una base de datos prospectiva. Métodos: Entre mayo de 2015 y junio de 2018 se seleccionaron pacientes con adenocarcinoma de recto medio o bajo con margen circunferencial de resección respetado sin enfermedad a distancia irresecable. Los pacientes fueron operados con la técnica TaTME por un mismo cirujano "en formación en TaTME" con experiencia y alto volumen de casos de cáncer de recto, habiendo realizado cursos homologados. En algunos de los casos se contó con la asistencia de un especialista internacional "proctor". Resultados: En el período estudiado se operaron 8 pacientes mediante TaTME. Edad media de 62 años (53-77). Siete recibieron Quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria (88%). Todas las piezas tuvieron un margen distal negativo, en 7 de 8 la resección del mesorrecto fue completa y en uno incompleta. El promedio de ganglios resecados fue de 12,5 (6-21). La mediana de tiempo operatorio fue de 351 minutos (255-480). La media de días de internación fue de 10.6 (4-19). Siete pacientes tuvieron complicaciones en el postoperatorio, 4 Clavien I y 3 II. Conclusiones: La aplicación de las estrategias de seguridad durante la implementación de una técnica nueva como el TaTME, ayudaría a la disminución de complicaciones intra y postoperatorias con buenos resultados desde el punto de vista oncológico. (AU)
Introduction: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a modern surgical technique that seeks the best oncological results avoiding anatomic and tumor-specific difficulties in middle and low rectal cancer. The spread of this operation led to complications that were not observed with traditional procedures in a purely transabdominal approach. That is why there are recommendations to follow when starting the TaTME practice. Objective: To show our initial results in TaTME operation implementing security strategies. Design: Retrospective analysis based on a prospective database. Methods: Between May 2015 and June 2018, patients with middle or low rectal adenocarcinoma, with respected circumferential margin in absence of distant unresectable disease were selected. Patients were operated with the TaTME technique by the same surgeon "trainee" with experience and high case volume of rectal cancer, who attended to different courses on the matter. In some of the cases, there was assistance of an international "proctor" specialist. Results: In the period of study, 8 patients underwent surgery through TaTME. Mean age was 62 years (53-77). Seven received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (88%). All the specimens had a negative distal margin, in 7 out of 8, resection of the mesorectum was complete whereas it was incomplete in one. The mean number of resected lymph nodes was 12.5 (6-21). The median operative time was 351 minutes (255-480). The mean time of hospital stay was 10.6 days (4-19). Seven patients had complications in the postoperative period, 4 Clavien I and 3 II. Conclusions: Application of safety strategies during the implementation of a new technique such as TaTME, would help to reduce intra and postoperative complications with good results from the oncological point of view. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Transanal Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Proctectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications , Preoperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Margins of ExcisionABSTRACT
Introducción: El estándar de tratamiento del cáncer de recto localmente avanzado es la escisión total del mesorrecto. Sin embargo, la preservación del órgano ha sido propuesta para los tumores con buena respuesta al tratamiento neoadyuvante. El objetivo de este estudio es investigar los resultados oncológicos de esta estrategia. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, en el que se analizó a los pacientes con adenocarcinoma de recto tratados con intención curativa entre 2005 y 2014 que, después de recibir quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante, presentaron una respuesta clínica completa o casi completa y fueron tratados con preservación del recto. Resultados: Durante el periodo de estudio, 204 pacientes con cáncer del recto recibieron neoadyuvancia. Treinta (14,7%) presentaron una respuesta clínica completa o casi completa y se trataron según una estrategia de preservación de órgano (23 watch & wait y 7 resecciones locales). La mediana de seguimiento fue de 46 meses (rango intercuartil: 30-68). En el grupo de watch & wait, 4 casos presentaron recurrencia local antes del año (tasa actuarial 18,5%). Todos pudieron ser rescatados (2 con cirugía radical y 2 con resecciones locales) sin presentar nuevas recurrencias. El índice de supervivencia libre de enfermedad a distancia a 3 años fue de 94,1% (IC 95%: 82,9-100). De los 7 casos que se trataron mediante resección local, ninguno presentó recurrencia local. Considerando toda la muestra, la proporción de conservación de órgano fue del 93%. Conclusiones: La estrategia de preservación de órgano en el cáncer rectal localmente avanzado es factible en casos con buena respuesta a la neoadyuvancia. Implementada en un grupo altamente seleccionado de pacientes, se asocia con resultados oncológicos satisfactorios (AU)
Introduction: The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is total mesorectal excision. However, organ preservation has been proposed for tumors with good response to neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic results of this strategy. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study (2005-2014) including a consecutive series of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma with complete or almost complete clinical response after preoperative chemo-radiotherapy, that were treated according to a strategy of preservation of the rectum. Results: A total of 204 patients with rectal cancer received neoadjuvant therapy. Thirty (14.7%) had a good response and were treated with rectal preservation (23 «Watch and Wait» and 7 local resections). Median follow-up was 46 months (interquartile range: 30-68). In the group of «Watch & Wait», 4 patients had local recurrence before 12 months (actuarial local recurrence rate = 18.5%). All of them underwent salvage surgery (2 with radical surgery and 2 local resections) without any further recurrence. Disease-free survival actuarial rate at 3 years follow-up was 94.1% (95% CI 82.9-100). None of the 7 patients that were treated by local excision had local recurrence. The organ preservation rate for the whole group was 93%. Conclusion: The strategy of organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancer is feasible in cases with good response to neoadjuvant therapy. When implemented in a highly selected group of patients this strategy is associated with satisfactory oncologic results (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/complications , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/instrumentation , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/instrumentation , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Organ Sparing Treatments/instrumentation , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Organ Sparing Treatments , Cohort Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is total mesorectal excision. However, organ preservation has been proposed for tumors with good response to neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic results of this strategy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study (2005-2014) including a consecutive series of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma with complete or almost complete clinical response after preoperative chemo-radiotherapy, that were treated according to a strategy of preservation of the rectum. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients with rectal cancer received neoadjuvant therapy. Thirty (14.7%) had a good response and were treated with rectal preservation (23 «Watch and Wait¼ and 7 local resections). Median follow-up was 46 months (interquartile range: 30-68). In the group of «Watch & Wait¼, 4 patients had local recurrence before 12 months (actuarial local recurrence rate=18.5%). All of them underwent salvage surgery (2 with radical surgery and 2 local resections) without any further recurrence. Disease-free survival actuarial rate at 3 years follow-up was 94.1% (95% CI 82.9-100). None of the 7 patients that were treated by local excision had local recurrence. The organ preservation rate for the whole group was 93%. CONCLUSION: The strategy of organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancer is feasible in cases with good response to neoadjuvant therapy. When implemented in a highly selected group of patients this strategy is associated with satisfactory oncologic results.
