ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Information on epidemiology of prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) patients in the acute care setting in Japan is totally lacking. We aimed to investigate clinical features, impact, and long-term outcomes of PMV patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Adult patients who were admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from April 2009 to March 2014 and required mechanical ventilation (MV) for ≥ 2 days were included. PMV was defined as having MV for ≥ 21 consecutive days. RESULTS: Among 1282 MV patients, 93 (7.3%) required PMV, and median duration of MV was 37.0 days. Compared with the non-PMV patients, PMV patients had longer total ICU and high care unit (HCU) stay (34.0 vs. 7.0 days, p < 0.001), longer hospital stay (74.0 vs. 35.0 days, p < 0.001), and higher hospital mortality (54.8 vs. 21.4%, p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, emergency ICU admission and steroid use during MV were associated with PMV. The Kaplan-Meier curves for MV withdrawal and ICU/HCU discharge were almost identical. Among PMV patients, 52 (55.9%) died, 29 (31.2%) were successfully liberated from MV during hospitalization, and 12 (12.9%) still required MV at discharge. CONCLUSION: In this investigation, 7.3% of the patients with MV required PMV. Most PMV patients were liberated from MV during hospitalization, while occupying critical care beds for an extended period. A nationwide survey is required to further elucidate the overall picture of PMV patients and to discuss whether specialized weaning centers to treat PMV patients are required in Japan.
ABSTRACT
This case highlights the probable association of significantly displaced posterior first-rib fracture and jagged edges of the fracture line following blunt chest trauma with delayed ipsilateral subclavian artery rupture. Early angiography and first-rib repair should promptly be considered under such circumstances.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: One of the concerns in the use of propofol is the pain on injection of the drug. Many attempts were made to prevent such pain, none of which has been reasonably successful. We hypothesized that the pain is attenuated when the patient is directed to concentrate on counting numbers while propofol is injected. METHODS: Ninety-one patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to counting or non-counting group. Patients in counting group were instructed to verbally count numbers backwards starting 100 when propofol was injected, while patients in non-counting group were injected propofol without any instructions. The size of the i.v. cannula, the temperature of the drug, and speed by which the drug was injected were controlled. No premedication was given. We interviewed the patients after the surgery and scored the pain on propofol injection, the pain on the placement of the iv cannula, and the anxiety level on entering the operating room. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of pain on injection of propofol (34% and 33% in the counting and the non-counting group, respectively). A multiple logistic-regression analysis revealed that the significant factors to cause pain on the injection of propofol were age and the degree of pain on inserting intravenous line. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive counting did not reduce the incidence of pain on injection of propofol. Age and the degree of pain on inserting intravenous cannula can be a useful predictor for an intolerable pain on injection of propofol.
