Complications and complaints in craniofacial fractures - Finnish national data for 20 years.

OBJECTIVE: Research on reasons for malpractice claims in oral and maxillofacial surgery is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the causes and prevalence of permanent harm among craniofacial fracture related malpractice claims. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective register study was designed and implemented. All patients with a complaint and a diagnosis of facial or cranial fracture were included. The main outcome was the presence of permanent harm, and the predictor variable was the cause of complaint. Chi-square test was used for estimation of statistical significance. RESULTS: Delay in correct diagnosis was the leading cause of malpractice claims (63.2%), and permanent harm was found in 23.1% of the population. 82.4% of injuries were facial fractures in total population. 65.3% (n = 98) of facial trauma were related with delayed diagnostics (p < 0.001). Permanent harm was more frequent in patients with delayed diagnosis (71.4%) than those without (60.7%, p = 0.299). CONCLUSIONS: Claims of craniofacial trauma are related with under-diagnostics, and un-diagnosed facial fracture can lead to a high rate of permanent harm. Systematic clinical evaluation and facial trauma specialist consultation is recommended to set early correct diagnosis for and improve treatment of craniofacial trauma patients.

Causes and treatment of temporomandibular luxation-a retrospective analysis of 260 patients.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to clarify the etiology, diagnostic process, and treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) luxation, as the standard care is mainly based on case-reports and systematic studies are lacking. The hypotheses were that luxation occurs spontaneously, recurrence manifests particularly among geriatric patients, and surgery is needed infrequently. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective study of TMJ luxation patients (n = 260) from 2007 to 2020 was designed and implemented. The primary outcome was type of TMJ luxation (i.e., recurrent or non-recurrent), and secondary outcomes were the need for and type of surgical intervention. Predictor variables comprised age, sex, presence of neurological condition, and mechanism of luxation. Administered treatment and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Of luxation, 61.9% was recurrent and 40.0% due to spontaneous cause. Only 1.9% of patients underwent surgical intervention. The presence of neurological condition caused a 1.34-fold risk for recurrence of luxation and general condition a 1.57-fold risk. CONCLUSIONS: TMJ luxation is often recurrent, bilateral, and spontaneous. Recurrent luxation is associated with geriatric and neurological conditions, and in this group recurrent TMJ luxation predicted death. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings contribute to more effective diagnostics and treatment of TMJ luxation patients. We show that there is a need to standardize diagnostic measures and treatment patterns. Moreover, collaboration with other specialities, especially neurology and geriatrics, is important.

Maxillofacial injuries among ice hockey players: a retrospective study from a Finnish trauma Centre.

OBJECTIVE: Ice hockey players are at risk of a variety of injuries. In our investigation, we aimed to evaluate the types of facial fractures, injury mechanisms and need for surgical intervention in professional and recreational ice hockey players. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients presenting to a tertiary trauma centre with any ice hockey-related facial fracture during the period from January 2013 to July 2020. The primary outcome variable was the need for surgical treatment, and the primary predictor variable was the injury mechanism. Demographic and clinically relevant variables were statistically evaluated and presented. RESULTS: Of 66 total patients, the most frequent fracture type was isolated mandible fracture (56.1%). Males were overrepresented (98.5%) in the patient population. Puck strikes were the most common mechanism of injury (74.2%). Surgical intervention was performed in nearly half of the patients (48.5%), and was significantly more common in younger patients (p = 0.006). Associated dental injuries were present in 27.3% of the cases and they were significantly associated with puck strikes (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Mandible fractures and puck strikes, the most common injury site and fracture mechanism respectively, sustained by ice-hockey players required surgical intervention in the majority of cases.

Primary reconstruction of combined orbital and zygomatic complex fractures with patient-specific milled titanium implants - A retrospective study.

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare mid-facial symmetry and clinical outcomes between patients treated with patient-specific and standard implants in primary fracture reconstructions of combined orbital and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Patients who underwent primary reconstruction of orbital and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures during the study period were identified and background and clinical variables and computed tomography images were collected from patient records. Zygomaticomaxillary complex dislocation and orbital volume were measured from pre- and postoperative images and compared between groups. Out of 165 primary orbital reconstructions, eight patients treated with patient-specific and 12 patients treated with standard implants were identified with mean follow-up time of was 110 days and 121 days, respectively. Postoperative orbital volume difference was similar between groups (0.2 ml for patient-specific vs 0.3 ml for standard implants, p = 0.942) despite larger preoperative difference in patient-specific implant group (2.1 ml vs 1,5 ml, p = 0.428), although no statistical differences were obtained in symmetricity or accuracy between the reconstruction groups. Within the limitations of the study it seems that patient-specific implants are a viable option for primary reconstructions of combined zygomaticomaxillary complex and orbital fractures, because with patient-specific implants at least as symmetrical results as with standard implants can be obtained in a single surgery.

Mandibular fractures in aged patients - Challenges in diagnosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Delayed treatment of a mandibular fracture can lead to complications. Therefore, early diagnosis is important. The aim of this study was to clarify the specific features of mandibular fractures in aged patients and the effect of age on possible missed diagnoses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients aged over 60 years with a recent mandibular fracture were included in the study. The outcome variable was a missed mandibular fracture during the patient's first assessment in the primary health care facility. Predictor variables were age group, categorized as older adults (aged ≥60 and <80 years), elders (aged >80 years), patient's age as a continuous variable and age sub-group divided into decades. Additional predictor variables were the patient's memory disease and injury associated with intracranial injury. Explanatory variables were gender, injury mechanism, type of mandibular facture, combined other facial fracture, edentulous mandible/maxilla/both, surgical treatment of the mandibular fracture, and scene of injury. RESULTS: Mandibular fractures were missed in 20.0% of the 135 patients during their first healthcare assessment. Significant associations between missed fractures and age group, gender, fracture type, or injury mechanism were not found. By contrast, memory disorder (p = .02) and site of injury (p = .02) were significantly associated with missed fractures. Fractures were missed more frequently in patients who were in hospital or in a nursing home at the time of injury. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of undiagnosed mandibular fractures in the aged population. Small injury force accidents may cause fractures in old and fragile individuals. Careful examination is necessary, especially in patients with memory disorder.

"A" stands for airway - Which factors guide the need for on-scene airway management in facial fracture patients?

BACKGROUND: Numerous guidelines highlight the need for early airway management in facial trauma patients since specific fracture patterns may induce airway obstruction. However, the incidence of these hallmark injuries, including flail mandibles and posterior displacement of the maxilla, is contentious. We aim to evaluate specific trauma-related variables in facial fracture patients, which affect the need for on-scene versus in-hospital airway management. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with any type of facial fracture, who required early airway management on-scene or in-hospital. The primary outcome variable was the site of airway management (on-scene versus hospital) and the main predictor variable was the presence of a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The association of fracture type, mechanism, and method for early airway management are also reported. Altogether 171 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Of the 171 patients included in the analysis, 100 (58.5) had combined midfacial fractures or combination fractures of facial thirds. Altogether 118 patients (69.0%) required airway management on-scene and for the remaining 53 patients (31.0%) airway was secured in-hospital. A total of 168 (98.2%) underwent endotracheal intubation, whereas three patients (1.8%) received surgical airway management. TBIs occurred in 138 patients (80.7%), but presence of TBI did not affect the site of airway management. Younger age, Glasgow Coma Scale-score of eight or less, and oro-naso-pharyngeal haemorrhage predicted airway management on-scene, whereas patients who had fallen at ground level and in patients with facial fractures but no associated injuries, the airway was significantly more often managed in-hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Proper preparedness for airway management in facial fracture patients is crucial both on-scene and in-hospital. Facial fracture patients need proper evaluation of airway management even when TBI is not present.

Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Analysis of 293 Isolated Blowout Fractures - Which Radiological Findings Guide Treatment Decision?

PURPOSE: Our study purpose was to clarify the extent of isolated unilateral orbital blowout fracture in relation to surgical treatment and other factors behind the treatment decision. The specific aim was to determine which computer-aided measurements based on radiological images associate with treatment choice. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was implemented on patients with an isolated unilateral orbital blowout fracture. Computer-aided measurement of fracture extent was performed. The study variables included treatment as primary outcome (surgical vs nonsurgical), post-traumatic orbital volume difference (mL) compared to contralateral orbit, fracture area (mm2), fracture depth (mm) as predictor variables, and age, sex, injury mechanism, side and site of orbital fracture and positions of recti muscles as explanatory variables. Postoperative outcomes were reported. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for surgery. The statistical significance level was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Of 293 patients, 28.0% received surgical and 72.0% nonsurgical treatment. Volume difference, fracture area and fracture depth predicted surgical outcome (P < .001). In adjusted univariate regression analyses, fractures with moderate and severe displacement of recti muscles were more likely to receive surgical treatment than fractures with mild or no displacement (OR 6.15 and 30.75, respectively, P < .001). Isolated medial wall fractures were significantly less often (OR 0.05, P = .006) and patients with older age (OR 0.97, P = .013) slightly less often treated with surgery. Patients with preoperative symptoms had more often persisting postoperative symptoms than patients without preoperative symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Positions of the recti muscles are an independent radiological factor guiding orbital blowout fracture treatment decision. The bony fracture extent is a combination of volume difference, fracture area and fracture depth which are strongly correlated to each other. A computer-aided method significantly facilitates the systematic evaluation of bone fragments, and the extent of orbital fractures.

Zygomatico-Orbital Fracture-Dislocation in Surgical Treatment: Novel 3-Dimensional Software Automated Analysis.

PURPOSE: The human capability to detect the degree of zygomatico-orbital (ZMO) fracture-dislocation in surgical treatment is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between ZMO fracture-dislocation and injury etiology and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented a retrospective cross-sectional study, enrolled a sample composed of patients with an isolated unilateral ZMO fracture, and analyzed fracture-dislocation from computed tomography images with an automatic algorithm. The primary predictor variable was mean surface point-to-point dislocation (the mean distance of dislocation for all surface points in isolated ZMO fracture segments between the original position and after virtual repositioning). The primary outcome was the treatment choice (operative vs nonoperative). Other studied variables were gender, age group, injury mechanism, clinical asymmetry, and human-evaluated dislocation on computed tomography images. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed, and the threshold for statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 115 patients with a mean age of 66.3 years, 66.1% of whom were male patients, and the most common cause of injury was falling on the ground (49.6%). Operative treatment was required in 58 patients (50.4%). A significant association was found between mean dislocation and operative treatment. Mean dislocation of operatively versus nonoperatively treated fractures was 2.39 mm versus 1.05 mm (P < .001). Mean fracture-dislocation was greatest in injuries caused by assault (2.41 mm) and smallest in motor vehicle accidents (1.08 mm) and ground-level falls (1.25 mm). The threshold of human-eye detection for ZMO fracture-dislocation was 1.97 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the threshold for operative treatment of ZMO fracture-dislocation is over 2 mm, which the human eye is able to detect. True dislocation is greater in younger patients than elderly patients and in injuries caused by assault compared with falling.

Associated Injuries Are Frequent and Severe Among Geriatric Patients With Zygomatico-Orbital Fractures.

PURPOSE: Associated injuries (AIs) are hypothesized to be frequent in geriatric zygomatico-orbital (ZMO) fractures. The study aim was to determine the relation between ZMO fractures and AIs in geriatric patients compared with younger adult patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-and-control study was carried out on geriatric patients at least 65 years of age (n = 93) and younger adult patients 20 to 30 years of age (n = 68) diagnosed with pure unilateral ZMO fractures. The main exposure was age, the primary outcome was AI outside the face, and the secondary outcomes were type and severity of AI, ocular injuries, restriction of mandibular movement, and ZMO buttress asymmetry. The confounding variables were gender, trauma mechanism, type of ZMO fracture, and dislocation. Statistical analyses included χ2 tests, risk evaluation with 2 × 2 tables, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: AIs outside the face, and particularly brain injuries, were significantly more frequent in the geriatric group than in the control group (P < .001). The significant predictors of AIs outside the face were fall from a height (66.7%), motor vehicle accidents (66.7%), and absence of ZMO dislocation (59.5%; P < .001). The adjusted risk of brain injury was 2.5-fold in the absence of dislocation. The geriatric group had a more than 5-fold higher risk of brain injuries compared with the younger control group (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: AIs in general, and particularly brain injuries, are frequent in geriatric ZMO fractures. Intracranial injuries should be ruled out, particularly in geriatric patients diagnosed with a non-dislocated ZMO fracture.

Isolated Orbital Fractures Are Severe Among Geriatric Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to clarify the reasons for, types of, and degree of involvement of the orbital wall and the severity of orbital fractures in geriatric patients and to compare the differences between geriatric and younger adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of geriatric patients aged at least 65 years (n = 72) and younger controls aged 20 to 50 years (n = 58) with a diagnosis of a unilateral isolated orbital fracture was designed and implemented. The main exposure was age, the primary outcome was the isolated orbital fracture type, and the secondary outcomes were the associated orbital zones, fracture area (cm2), degree of dislocation (mm), involvement of anatomic landmarks, diplopia, altered ocular position, restricted eye movement, and ocular injuries. The confounding variables were gender, trauma mechanism, and alcohol abuse. The statistical methods included χ2 tests and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Among the geriatric patients, the great majority of isolated orbital fractures had been caused by falls (66.7%; P < .001). Geriatric orbital fractures were significantly more often extensive (2 cm2 or larger; P = .045) and associated with the middle-posterior orbital third (P = .032). In the logistic regression analyses, the elderly had a 2.2-fold greater risk of fractures of the middle-posterior orbital third and a 2.3-fold greater risk of extensive fractures compared with the younger controls. Ocular injuries were only diagnosed in the geriatric patients (5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Falling is the most common mechanism of elderly orbital fractures. Isolated orbital fractures are extensive and mainly affect the globe supporting the middle and posterior parts of the orbital floor among geriatric patients.

Among Patients With Facial Fractures, Geriatric Patients Have an Increased Risk for Associated Injuries.

PURPOSE: It is hypothesized that facial trauma-associated injuries (AIs) are more frequent and severe in elderly than in younger adult patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of, reasons for, and severity of AI in geriatric facial fractures and to compare the differences between geriatric and younger adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two patient cohorts were included in this cross-sectional retrospective study. Geriatric patients were at least 65 years old (n = 117) and younger controls were 20 to 50 years old (n = 136). The main predictor was age, the primary outcome was AI, and secondary outcomes were affected organ system, multiple AIs, polytrauma, and mortality during hospitalization. The other explanatory variables were gender, trauma mechanism, and type of facial fracture. Statistical methods included χ(2) tests, risk analyses with 2 × 2 table, and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: AIs were significantly more common in geriatric patients (44.0%) than in younger controls (25.0%; P < .001). Also, multiple AIs (P = .003), polytrauma (P = .039), mortality (P = .008), limb injuries (P = .005), and spine injuries (P = .041) were significantly more common in the elderly. In the risk analyses, geriatric patients had a 1.8-fold risk for AI, a 2.6-fold risk for multiple AIs, and a 2.2-fold risk for polytrauma. CONCLUSIONS: AIs are much more frequent and severe in geriatric patients, and the elderly die more often of their injuries. The results emphasize that elderly patients require specific attention and multi-professional collaboration in the diagnosis and sequencing of trauma treatment.

Etiology of facial fractures in elderly Finns during 2006-2007.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to clarify the trauma mechanisms and resulting facial fractures in geriatric patients and to compare them with those of younger adults. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 117 geriatric patients was compared with 136 patients aged 20 to 50 years. The statistical significance of differences between the age groups was evaluated with χ(2) tests. RESULTS: Falls on the ground were significantly more frequent among geriatric patients (P < .001), whereas assault was more frequent in controls (P < .001). Accident rates in geriatric patients were significantly higher during the winter months (P = .04). Fractures of the midface in general (P = .001) and of the nasal bone (P = .004) and orbit (P = .015) in particular were more frequent in geriatric patients. CONCLUSIONS: Age-related factors and preexisting medical problems predispose the elderly to falls and subsequent fractures. Footwear traction devices are recommended during the cold season. Orbital fractures should be strongly suspected in the elderly.