ABSTRACT
AIMS: False negative cases in the intraoperative assessment of sentinel node (SN) metastases in breast cancer prompt for a secondary axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Such ALND is technically demanding and prone to complications in patients with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) if there is a microvascular anastomosis or the thoracodorsal pedicle of a latissimus dorsi flap in the axilla. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer patients undergoing IBR. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive breast cancer patients undergoing SNB with the intraoperative diagnosis of SN metastases simultaneously with mastectomy and IBR between 2004 and 2006 were included in this study. Results of the SNB and especially the false negative cases in the intraoperative diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven patients had tumor positive SN. Nine of these cases were detected intraoperatively. The two false negative cases in the intraoperative diagnosis constituted of isolated tumor cells only. CONCLUSIONS: Our present study suggests that SNB with intraoperative diagnosis of SN metastases is feasible in patients undergoing IBR if the risk of nodal metastasis is low and the sensitivity of intraoperative SNB diagnosis is high.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Adult , Aged , Axilla , False Negative Reactions , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Lymph Node Excision , Lymphatic Metastasis , Mammaplasty , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the outcome of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer patients with large primary tumours. METHODS: Nine hundred and eighty-four patients with invasive breast cancer and SNB were studied. The histological tumour size was larger than 3 cm in 70 patients. The advantages of SNB like avoiding axillary clearance (AC) or more accurate staging by detecting micrometastases or parasternal sentinel node metastases were evaluated in relation to the tumour size. RESULTS: Axillary metastases were detected in 351/914 patients with a tumour size of 3 cm or smaller and in 50/70 patients with larger tumours (p<<0.0001). Micrometastases or isolated tumour cells only, were observed in 134/351 node positive patients with tumours not larger than 3 cm and in 10/50 cases with larger tumours (p=0.022). Parasternal sentinel node metastases were detected in 17/914 patients with a tumour size of 3 cm or smaller and 2/70 patients with larger tumours (p=ns). AC was omitted because of tumour negative sentinel node findings 168 of the 232 patients with stage T1 a-b tumours and 281 of those 489 with T1c tumours. Twenty of the 70 patients with tumours larger than 3 cm avoided AC. CONCLUSIONS: SNB is not sensible in breast cancer patients with tumours larger than 3 cm, because of the small proportion avoiding AC after SNB.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Axilla , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Statistics, Nonparametric , SternumABSTRACT
AIMS: The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of and risk factors for non-sentinel node (NSN) involvement in breast cancer patients with sentinel node (SN) micrometastases. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with SN micrometastases were included. Both the SN and NSN were examined using serial sectioning and immunohistohemistry. Various indices were evaluated as possible risk factors for NSN involvement. RESULTS: NSN involvement was found in 22/84 patients. The median size of the NSN metastases was 1.25 mm (0.01-12 mm). The NSN metastases were larger than 2 mm in 8 patients and smaller than 0.2 mm in 6 patients. NSN involvement was observed in 14/35 patients with metastatic findings in all removed SN. Three of the 23 patients with 2 or 3 tumour negative SN had NSN metastases. None of the 12 patients with 4 or more uninvolved SN had NSN metastases. NSN involvement could not excluded by other patient, tumour or sentinel node related factors. CONCLUSIONS: Every fourth patient will have residual disease in the axilla, 10% even large metastases, if axillary clearance is omitted in patients with SN micrometastases. The risk of NSN involvement seems negligible in patients with a single SN micrometastasis and four or more healthy SN harvested.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Axilla/pathology , Chi-Square Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Lymph Node Excision , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
AIMS: To compare two methods of histological assessment with intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel node metastases in breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 204 consecutive breast cancer cases with lymphatic mapping, sentinel node biopsy and intraoperative diagnosis were included. The sentinel nodes in the first 102 cases (method A) were bisected and serially sectioned. In the other 102 cases (method B) the nodes were sliced thinly with a razor blade. All 1-1.5 mm thick slices were mounted on prechilled mounting medium on frozen section buttons. Cytological imprints were also made of the attached tissue slices. Postoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node metatases was taken as gold standard. Sentinel node metastases were found in 28 (27%) cases in group A and in 42 (40%) cases in group B (P = 0.05). The median size of the sentinel node metastases was 4.3 mm in group A and 3.3 mm in group B (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Method B finds more and smaller metastases and takes less time and effort in the laboratory. When using method A, many small metastases are not detected at all.
