Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 62(2): 276-281, 2020 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32666761

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Besides an effective screening method for developmental dysplasia of the hip, there is certain number of children in whom the condition has been overseen or they have never been screened and the parents have noticed the odd walking pattern in their toddler. Treatment of such patients is controversial. One of the recommended treatment methods because of the short-term hospitalization, but often considered unsuccessful is closed reduction of the hip followed by cast immobilization. HYPOTHESIS: Closed hip reduction in late diagnosed developmental dysplasia of the hip gives good results. AIM: Our aim in this retrospective study was evaluation of the success of the treatment with closed reduction of hip dislocation in children older than 12 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the study, we included 20 patients treated at our clinic from June 2004 to May 2017. Of these 20 patients, 8 had bilateral involvement, 12 had unilateral, in a total of 28 hips. In all patients we noted preoperatively the range of movement, the presence of limp, any limb inequality, and hip pain. We used clinical and radiological parameters for evaluation. Clinically, we examined the range of movement, limb inequality as well as limb function and we classified it according to the modified McKay's criteria. Same examinations were done at 1, 3, and 5 years after closed reduction. RESULTS: At the last follow-up examination, using McKey's criteria for clinical evaluation we rated the hips in two patients (7%) as grade III, i.e. fair grade, 10 hips (36%) were grade II - rated good, and 16 hips (57%) were evaluated as grade I. In four hips, there were signs of avascular necrosis of the hip, while in one patient the avascular necrosis developed after the closed reduction. Radiographic assessment (Figs 3, 4) using Severin's scoring system showed no hips with types V and VI, type IV was observed in 7%, type III in 21%, type II in 29%, while most of the hips (12, 43%) were type I. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the procedure was justified. An advantage of this method is that it is inexpensive; it entails no direct operative changes of the bone structures and gives good results.


Subject(s)
Casts, Surgical , Delayed Diagnosis , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/therapy , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Age Factors , Child, Preschool , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Range of Motion, Articular , Severity of Illness Index
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 85(5): 798-801, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12728027

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis is a serious complication of the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The purpose of the present study was to identify factors influencing the development of osteonecrosis. METHODS: Two hundred and forty patients who had been treated for slipped capital femoral epiphysis between 1965 and 1999 were retrospectively evaluated. Treatment included stabilization with a spica cast or fixation with one to four pins or screws. Radiographs that had been made at the time of presentation, before and after the operation, and at consecutive follow-up examinations were reviewed. Osteonecrosis was defined retrospectively on the basis of radiographic evidence of sclerosis and collapse of the femoral head. The risk of development of osteonecrosis was correlated with various clinical and radiographic parameters. RESULTS: All twenty-one patients in whom osteonecrosis developed had presented with an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. None of the 204 patients who had presented with a stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis, regardless of grade, had development of osteonecrosis. In the group of patients who had presented with an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis, the risk of development of osteonecrosis increased with the severity (grade) of the slip. Osteonecrosis was more likely to develop in patients who had been treated with multiple pins than in those who had been treated with a single cannulated screw. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have a stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis are not at risk for the development of osteonecrosis when treated with pinning in situ. Patients who have an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis have a decreased risk of osteonecrosis when treated with pinning in situ. Complete or partial reduction of an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis increases the risk of development of osteonecrosis. Pinning in situ without reduction with a single cannulated screw is the method of choice for the treatment of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis.


Subject(s)
Epiphyses, Slipped/surgery , Femur Head Necrosis/etiology , Femur Head , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Bone Nails , Bone Screws , Child , Delaware/epidemiology , Epiphyses, Slipped/pathology , Femur Head Necrosis/diagnostic imaging , Femur Head Necrosis/epidemiology , Humans , Prevalence , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...