Usefulness of breath-hold compressed sensing accelerated three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) added to respiratory-gating conventional MRCP.

PURPOSE: To clarify the clinical usefulness of breath-hold compressed sensing three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (BH-MRCP) added to conventional respiratory-gating MRCP (RG-MRCP), we prospectively evaluated the image quality of BH-MRCP and compared it with that of RG-MRCP. We also evaluated to what extent the overall image quality was improved by adding BH-MRCP to RG-MRCP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 113 patients who underwent RG-MRCP and BH-MRCP at a 3-T MR unit were enrolled. We set a scan time of approximately 180 s for RG-MRCP and 20 s for BH-MRCP before examination, and measured actual scan time and assessed image quality using a 5-point scale (5, good; 1, poor). Image quality scores of 1, 2 and 3 were considered clinically inadequate. Image quality scores of RG-MRCP and BH-MRCP were compared. In addition, we compared "RG-MRCP alone" and "hybrid MRCP" (the best-scoring image was picked from RG-MRCP and BH-MRCP when the RG-MRCP score was clinically inadequate). RESULTS: The mean actual scan time of RG-MRCP/BH-MRCP was 191/20 s. The mean scores of RG-MRCP, BH-MRCP and hybrid MRCP were 3.67, 3.35 and 3.92, respectively. The score of hybrid MRCP was significantly better than that of RG-MRCP (P <  0.05). The image quality of RG-MRCP was clinically inadequate in 43/113 (38 %) cases and the inadequate image quality was improved to be clinically adequate in 13/43 (30 %) cases by adding BH-MRCP. CONCLUSION: BH-MRCP brings added value to RG-MRCP because an additional examination of BH-MRCP could compensate for the image deterioration of RG-MRCP caused by motion artifacts.

Usefulness of free-breathing readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE) for detection of malignant liver tumors: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI).

PURPOSE: We aimed to clarify the usefulness of free-breathing readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE), which is multi-shot echo-planar imaging based on a 2D-navigator-based reacquisition technique, for detecting malignant liver tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 77 patients with malignant liver tumors, free-breathing RESOLVE and respiratory-triggered single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) at 3-T MR unit were performed. We set a scan time up to approximately 5 min (300s) before examination, measured actual scan time and assessed (1) susceptibility and (2) motion artifacts in the right and left liver lobes (3, no artifact; 1, marked), and (3) detectability of malignant liver tumors (3, good; 1, poor) using a 3-point scale. RESULTS: The median actual scan time of RESOLVE/SS-EPI was 365/423s. The median scores of each factor in RESOLVE/SS-EPI were as following in this order: (1) 3/2 (right lobe); 3/3 (left lobe), (2) 2/3 (right lobe); 1/2 (left lobe), and (3) 3/3, respectively. Significant differences were noted between RESOLVE and SS-EPI in all evaluated factors (P<0.05) except for susceptibility of left lobe and detectability of the lesions. CONCLUSION: Despite the effect of motion artifacts, RESOLVE provides a comparable detectability of the lesion and the advantage of reducing scanning time compared with SS-EPI.

Radial volumetric imaging breath-hold examination (VIBE) with k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) for dynamic gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI of the liver: advantages over Cartesian VIBE in the arterial phase.

OBJECTIVES: To compare radial volumetric imaging breath-hold examination with k-space weighted image contrast reconstruction (r-VIBE-KWIC) to Cartesian VIBE (c-VIBE) in arterial phase dynamic gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the liver. METHODS: We reviewed 53 consecutive DCE-MRI studies performed on a 3-T unit using c-VIBE and 53 consecutive cases performed using r-VIBE-KWIC with full-frame image subset (r-VIBEfull) and sub-frame image subsets (r-VIBEsub; temporal resolution, 2.5-3 s). All arterial phase images were scored by two readers on: (1) contrast-enhancement ratio (CER) in the abdominal aorta; (2) scan timing; (3) artefacts; (4) visualisation of the common, right, and left hepatic arteries. RESULTS: Mean abdominal aortic CERs for c-VIBE, r-VIBEfull, and r-VIBEsub were 3.2, 4.3 and 6.5, respectively. There were significant differences between each group (P < 0.0001). The mean score for c-VIBE was significantly lower than that for r-VIBEfull and r-VIBEsub in all factors except for visualisation of the common hepatic artery (P < 0.05). The mean score of all factors except for scan timing for r-VIBEsub was not significantly different from that for r-VIBEfull. CONCLUSIONS: Radial VIBE-KWIC provides higher image quality than c-VIBE, and r-VIBEsub features high temporal resolution without image degradation in arterial phase DCE-MRI. KEY POINTS: Radial VIBE-KWIC minimised artefact and produced high-quality and high-temporal-resolution images. Maximum abdominal aortic enhancement was observed on sub-frame images of r-VIBE-KWIC. Using r-VIBE-KWIC, optimal arterial phase images were obtained in over 90 %. Using r-VIBE-KWIC, visualisation of the hepatic arteries was improved. A two-reader study revealed r-VIBE-KWIC's advantages over Cartesian VIBE.