Simplified 10-day bismuth triple therapy for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection: experience from clinical practice in a population with a high frequency of metronidazole resistance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cure rate of Helicobacter pylori infection, including the impact of in vitro metronidazole resistance (M-R), and the side effects of a simplified 10-day bismuth triple therapy in routine clinical practice. METHODS: From September 1995 to March 1996, 248 consecutive H. pylori-positive patients received 10 days of bismuth subnitrate 150 mg, oxytetracycline 500 mg, and metronidazole 400 mg, all t.id. Before treatment, upper endoscopy, including biopsy specimens for microbiological analysis and IgG serology were performed. M-R was found in 45% of females and 36% of males. At least 2 months after treatment, H. pylori status was assessed by the 14C urea breath test (n = 131), endoscopy (n = 37), urea breath test and endoscopy (n = 63), or solely by IgG serology (n = 7). Ten patients withdrew. IgG serology was performed again after 1 yr. RESULTS: H. pylori infection was cured in 205 patients: 86% by all-patients-treated analysis and 83% by intention-to-treat analysis. When patients were classified according to pretreatment metronidazole susceptibility, cure of infection was achieved in 76% of females harboring M-R strains versus 96% of those with sensitive strains (p = 0.002) and in 81% versus 88% (p = 0.34) of males with M-R versus sensitive strains, respectively. Twelve patients (5 %) had to stop treatment prematurely because of severe side effects, but eight of them were treated successfully. One case of H. pylori infection (0.6 %) was detected at 1-yr follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Ten-day bismuth triple therapy t.i.d. was effective in curing H. pylori infection in the context of routine clinical practice. The efficacy was reduced in females harboring M-R strains.

A comparison between omeprazole-based triple therapy and bismuth-based triple therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective randomized 1-yr follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and side effects of standard bismuth triple therapy with those of omeprazole-based triple therapy in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection and duodenal ulcer disease. METHODS: One hundred patients were prospectively recruited and randomized to receive either bismuth subnitrate 75 mg q.i.d., oxytetracycline 500 mg q.i.d., and metronidazole 400 mg b.i.d. (regimen BTM), or omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 400 mg b.i.d. (regimen OAM), both for 14 days. Upper endoscopy (with antral biopsy specimens for microbiology and antral and corpus biopsy specimens for histology) was performed before treatment, after 2 months, and again 1 yr after treatment. Serum samples for serology (IgG) were taken. Patients with in vitro metronidazole-resistant (M-R) H. pylori strains were excluded. In a nonrandomized study, 41 patients with M-R strains were given either BTM or OAM. RESULTS: According to intention-to-treat analysis, H. pylori cure rates were 91% and 96% with BTM and OAM, respectively (p = 0.45). In the BTM group, the mean total side effect score was higher (p < 0.001), and more severe side effects were reported (32% vs. 4%, p < 0.001). In the nonrandomized group of patients with M-R strains, H. pylori cure rates were 88% and 67% with BTM and OAM, respectively. All of the successfully treated patients were still H. pylori-negative after 1 yr. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment regimens were highly effective in curing H. pylori infection in patients with metronidazole-sensitive strains. Omeprazole-based triple therapy was tolerated better than standard bismuth-based triple therapy.

Highly effective twice-daily triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease: does in vitro metronidazole resistance have any clinical relevance?

OBJECTIVES: To compare cure rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, ulcer healing, and side effects of three simplified regimens of triple therapy in patients with peptic ulcer disease. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-one patients were prospectively randomized to receive either regimen OAM (omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 400 g b.i.d.), OCM (omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 400 mg b.i.d.), or BCM (bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 400 mg b.i.d.), all for 10 days. Side effects were reported immediately afterward in a self-administered questionnaire. Upper endoscopy was carried out before treatment and 2 months after treatment. Three antral and three corpus biopsy specimens were analyzed microbiologically and with rapid urease test to determine the presence of H. pylori. Altogether 143 patients (62%) had an active ulcer at start of treatment. Metronidazole resistant (M-R) H. pylori strains were found in 30% of patients, while none had clarithromycin resistant (C-R) strains. RESULTS: According to intention-to-treat analysis, H. pylori cure rates were 91, 95, and 95% with OAM, OCM, and BCM, respectively (p = 0.63). In patients with metronidazole-sensitive (M-S) strains versus M-R strains, the cure rates were 96 versus 77% with OAM (p = 0.025), 94 versus 94% with OCM, and 94 versus 96% with BCM. Ulcer healing rates were 95, 94, and 92%, respectively (p = 0.91). There were no significant differences in side effects between the regimens, and only five patients (2%) had to stop the treatment prematurely. CONCLUSIONS: All treatment regimens were highly effective for cure of H. pylori infection and for ulcer healing. Metronidazole resistance reduced the efficacy of OAM, but was of no importance for the efficacy of OCM or BCM. Side effects were of minor importance.

Highly effective second-line anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy in patients with previously failed metronidazole-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: In this study we compared the cure rates of two clarithromycin-based regimens in patients in whom anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy had previously failed. METHODS: Thirty-three patients were randomized to receive either regimen OAC (20 mg omeprazole, 750 mg amoxicillin, and 250 mg clarithromycin) or BTC (240 mg bismuth subcitrate, 750 mg oxytetracycline, and 250 mg clarithromycin), all twice daily for 10 days. A further 28 patients were all treated with OAC. Previously failed therapy included combinations of bismuth (B), omeprazole (O), tetracycline (T), metronidazole (M), amoxicillin (A), or clarithromycin (C) in BTM (n = 48), OAM (n = 13), OA (n = 7), OCM (n = 2), or BCM (n = 1). H. pylori infection was confirmed by culture of biopsy specimens, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with the E test. RESULTS: H. pylori infection was cured in all patients (n = 18) with OAC and in 8 patients (53%) with BTC (P = 0.001) in the randomized group and in 27 patients (96%) receiving OAC in the open-label group. CONCLUSIONS: Ten-day OAC is highly effective and superior to BTC in patients in whom metronidazole-based treatment has previously failed.