Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 12(2): e7125, 2020 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32257671

ABSTRACT

Transhiatal herniation of the pancreas is rare with only 17 cases reported in 25 years. Presentation of pancreatic herniation is diverse. In the majority of cases, the pancreatic herniation is found incidentally on CT-scans made for evaluating complaints related to a large or giant hiatal hernia. We present a literature review and case series of three patients with symptomatic type IV hiatal hernia with incidental, asymptomatic pancreatic herniation. All cases were managed laparoscopically with robotic assistance.

2.
J Robot Surg ; 10(1): 33-9, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26809755

ABSTRACT

Surgery for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia leads to recurrence or persisting dysphagia in a minority of patients. Redo antireflux surgery in GERD and hiatal hernia is known for higher morbidity and mortality. This study aims to evaluate conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo antireflux surgery, with the objective to detect possible advantages for the robot-assisted approach. A single institute cohort of 75 patients who underwent either conventional laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent GERD or severe dysphagia between 2008 and 2013 were included in the study. Baseline characteristics, symptoms, medical history, procedural data, hospital stay, complications and outcome were prospectively gathered. The main indications for redo surgery were dysphagia, pyrosis or a combination of both in combination with a proven anatomic abnormality. The mean time to redo surgery was 1.9 and 2.0 years after primary surgery for the conventional and robot-assisted groups, respectively. The number of conversions was lower in the robot-assisted group compared to conventional laparoscopy (1/45 vs. 5/30, p = 0.035) despite a higher proportion of patients with previous surgery by laparotomy (9/45 vs. 1/30, p = 0.038). Median hospital stay was reduced by 1 day (3 vs. 4, p = 0.042). There were no differences in mortality, complications or outcome. Robotic support, when available, can be regarded beneficial in redo surgery for GERD and hiatal hernia. Results of this observational study suggest technical feasibility for minimal-invasive robot-assisted redo surgery after open primary antireflux surgery, a reduced number of conversions and shorter hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Laparoscopy , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fundoplication , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/mortality , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Reoperation/adverse effects , Reoperation/methods , Reoperation/mortality , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/mortality , Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Failure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...