Evaluation of tracheal intubations in a paediatric intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION: Tracheal intubation is a frequent procedure in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) that carries a risk of complications that can increase morbidity and mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, longitudinal, observational study in patients intubated in a level III PICU between January and December 2020. We analysed the risk factors associated with failed intubation and adverse events. RESULTS: The analysis included 48 intubations. The most frequent indication for intubation was hypoxaemic respiratory failure (25%). The first attempt was successful in 60.4% of intubations, without differences between procedures performed by staff physicians and resident physicians (62.5% vs 56.3%; P = .759). Difficulty in bag-mask ventilation was associated with failed intubation in the first attempt (P = .028). Adverse events occurred in 12.5% of intubations, and severe events in 8.3%, including 1 case of cardiac arrest, 2 cases of severe hypotension and 1 of oesophageal intubation with delayed recognition. None of the patients died. Making multiple attempts was significantly associated with adverse events (P < .002). Systematic preparation of the procedure with cognitive aids and role allocation was independently associated with a lower incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill children, first-attempt intubation failure is common and associated with difficulty in bag-mask ventilation. A significant percentage of intubations may result in serious adverse events. The implementation of intubation protocols could decrease the incidence of adverse events.

Evaluación de las intubaciones endotraqueales en una unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos / Evaluation of tracheal intubations in a paediatric intensive care unit

Introducción: La intubación traqueal es un procedimiento frecuente en las unidades de cuidados intensivos pediátricos con riesgo de complicaciones que pueden aumentar la morbimortalidad. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio descriptivo y analítico de una cohorte prospectiva que incluye a los pacientes intubados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos de tercer nivel entre enero y diciembre de 2020, analizando los factores asociados con el fracaso de intubación y los efectos adversos. Resultados: Se analizaron 48 intubaciones. La indicación más frecuente fue el fallo respiratorio hipoxémico (25%). El primer intento de intubación fue exitoso en el 60,4%, sin diferencias entre los médicos adjuntos y los residentes (62,5 vs. 56,3%; p=0,759). La dificultad en la ventilación con bolsa y mascarilla se asoció con el fracaso del primer intento de intubación (p=0,028). Se objetivaron eventos adversos en un 12,5% de las intubaciones, siendo graves en un 8,3% de los casos, incluyendo una parada cardiorrespiratoria, 2 casos de hipotensión grave y una intubación esofágica detectada de forma tardía. Ninguno de los pacientes falleció. Los intentos múltiples de intubación se asociaron significativamente con la aparición de eventos adversos (p<0,002). La preparación sistemática del procedimiento con ayudas cognitivas y asignación de los papeles del equipo se relacionó de forma independiente con un menor número de eventos adversos. Conclusiones: El éxito en el primer intento de intubación en niños en estado crítico es bajo y se relaciona con la dificultad de ventilación con bolsa y mascarilla. En un porcentaje significativo pueden presentar efectos adversos graves. La utilización de protocolos puede disminuir el número de eventos adversos. (AU)

Introduction: Tracheal intubation is a frequent procedure in paediatric intensive care units that carries a risk of complications that can increase morbidity and mortality. Patients and methods: Prospective, longitudinal, observational study in patients intubated in a level iii paediatric intensive care unit between January and December 2020. We analysed the risk factors associated with failed intubation and adverse events. Results: The analysis included 48 intubations. The most frequent indication for intubation was hypoxaemic respiratory failure (25%). The first attempt was successful in 60.4% of intubations, without differences between procedures performed by staff physicians and resident physicians (62.5 vs. 56.3%; P=.759). Difficulty in bag-mask ventilation was associated with failed intubation in the first attempt (P=.028). Adverse events occurred in 12.5% of intubations, and severe events in 8.3%, including one case of cardiac arrest, 2 cases of severe hypotension and one of oesophageal intubation with delayed recognition. None of the patients died. Making multiple attempts was significantly associated with adverse events (P<.002). Systematic preparation of the procedure with cognitive aids and role allocation was independently associated with a lower incidence of adverse events. Conclusions: In critically ill children, first-attempt intubation failure is common and associated with difficulty in bag-mask ventilation. A significant percentage of intubations may result in serious adverse events. The implementation of intubation protocols could decrease the incidence of adverse events. (AU)

Modified Intraumbilical Versus Infraumbilical Entry Method at Laparoscopy: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal laparoscopic entry method. Whether a transumbilical or periumbilical incision is beneficial for the initial peritoneal access has been debated. These 2 methods have their own advocates, since each has its own benefits and disadvantages. Furthermore, the lack of consensus extends to the type of entry technique [Hasson, Veress needle (VN), direct trocar]. We have conducted a study comparing a modified intraumbilical technique (MIT), a novel method that combines a VN insertion through a modified direct-trocar access, with the standard infraumbilical VN technique. Our aim is to determine which technique is a better route for the initial umbilical trocar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 406 patients from a prospectively maintained database has been performed. Two cohorts of cases have been analyzed (VN=198; MIT=208). Primary outcomes were intraoperative access-related events, entry failure, and long-term wound complications. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 and 6 months and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Subcutaneous emphysema, extraperitoneal insufflation, and difficult entry (>2 VN insertions) occurred more frequently in the VN group (P=0.011, 0.023, and 0.023, respectively). There were 5 (2.52%) failed entries in the VN group and none in the MIT group (P=0.085). Regarding postoperative complications, seroma of the wound occurred more frequently in the VN group (P=0.033). At a mean follow-up of 18.4 months, 13 (3.20%) trocar-site hernias were detected, equally distributed among both groups. CONCLUSIONS: MIT eliminates the risk of failed entries and some complications associated with the VN technique without an increase in umbilical wound infection and facilitates a proper closure of the umbilical incision to secure a low trocar-site hernia rate. Halfway between open and closed techniques for laparoscopic entry, MIT is a safe and feasible procedure that embodies the advantages of both methods and may constitute an advantageous alternative to the infraumbilical VN entry approach.