Patient-Defined Treatment Success: Perspectives of Patients With Advanced-Stage Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: In the United States, lung cancer accounts for 14% of cancer diagnoses and 28% of cancer deaths annually. Because no cure exists for advanced lung cancer, the primary treatment goal is to prolong survival. OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to determine whether individual preferences, characteristics, and treatment experiences affect the meaning of treatment success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quantitative study using an observational, longitudinal cohort of patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer was conducted. Data sources included medical records and patient interviews. Data were analyzed using χ2, Fisher's exact, and McNemar's tests, as well as logistic regressions. RESULTS: At the first interview of 235 individuals, 12% considered survival alone as their definition of treatment success; others defined treatment success as survival plus other aspects, such as quality of life and reaching an important personal goal. As they moved through chemotherapy, 47% of the patients changed their definition of treatment success. Bivariate analysis showed that patients with lower incomes tended to be more likely to change their definition of treatment success compared with their counterparts with higher income (P = .0245). CONCLUSION: By taking chemotherapy, patients expect to increase their odds of survival and want to maintain the quality of life and functionality. A patient's definition of treatment success is often changing as treatment continues, making it appropriate to ensure patient-provider communication throughout their clinical care. The study results are limited to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and drawn from a predominantly white patient population, mainly from the US Midwest.

BRAF V600Q-mutated lung adenocarcinoma with duodenal metastasis and extreme leukocytosis.

Driver mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can lead to distinct behaviors and patterns of metastasis. Mutations in the proto-oncogene B-raf (BRAF) occur in approximately 3% of NSCLC cases. In the literature, reports of patients with lung adenocarcinomas metastasizing to the duodenum are rare, and most of the only 21 cases reported were from before the advent of next-generation sequencing. We present here a case involving a 57-year-old female who had a lytic lesion in her lesser trochanter. Biopsy showed metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung origin. Chest X-ray showed a large left upper lobe mass. Next-generation sequencing analysis confirmed the presence of BRAF V600Q mutation. The patient presented with persistent anemia and melena. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy confirmed the presence of duodenal metastasis. She also had suspected paraneoplastic leukemoid reaction. To our knowledge, this is only the second well-documented case of gastrointestinal metastasis from BRAF-mutated lung cancer.

Weekly vinorelbine and paclitaxel in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II Fred and Pamela Buffet Cancer Center Clinical Trials Network study.

OBJECTIVE: Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is the standard for most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Toxicity concerns limit chemotherapy for patients over 70years. Vinorelbine and paclitaxel are effective as single agents in advanced NSCLC. This phase II study evaluates safety and efficacy of a combination of these two agents in patients >70years with advanced NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with treatment naïve metastatic NSCLC received two cycles comprising 6 weekly doses of vinorelbine and paclitaxel, with restaging scans at week 8. Patients with radiographic progression came off study. The estimated sample size was 29. Toxicity analyses were conducted after 10 patients and again after 19 patients were enrolled. Outcomes were safety and efficacy, progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: The study closed at second interim analysis as 6/19 patients had ≥grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity (respiratory failure, sepsis, ischemic encephalopathy, pneumonia, hypoxemia, cardiopulmonary arrest, neutropenic fever, death). Of the 16 evaluable patients, 7 completed the study. Disease control rate (partial response+stable disease) was 47% (n=9); 37% (n=7) progressed. No complete responses were seen. Median PFS was 3.5months (95% CI: 1.4, 5.5) and OS 7.8months (95% CI: 1.9, 13.6). QOL did not change compared to baseline, at week 9, but increased at week 17. CONCLUSIONS: Although the combination met its response end points, increased toxicity makes this combination unsuitable for older patients. While QOL improved over the study, the small sample hinders interpretation.

Coping with an Advanced Stage Lung Cancer Diagnosis: Patient, Caregiver, and Provider Perspectives on the Role of the Health Care System.

Although lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the USA, there have been few studies on patient-centered advanced lung cancer treatment practices. As part of a larger research study on how to use a patient-inclusive approach in late-stage lung cancer treatment, this present study describes patient, caregiver, and provider perspectives on the role of the health care system in helping patients cope with an advanced stage lung cancer diagnosis. Four focus group sessions were conducted with six to eleven participants per group for a total of 36 participants. Two focus groups were held with patients and family members/caregivers and two with physicians and nurses. A major theme that emerged concerned coping with an advanced lung cancer diagnosis, which is the subject of this paper. The patients, caregivers, and providers spoke passionately about interactions with the health care system and volunteered examples of supportive and non-supportive relationships between patients and clinicians. They advocated for better patient-provider communication practices as well as the expanded use of patient navigation and new patient orientation programs. This study contributes additional knowledge by including the perspectives of caregivers and providers who live and work closely with patients with advanced lung cancer. The findings can inform the development of comprehensive patient-centered care plans for patients living with an advanced lung cancer diagnosis.

Engaging patients and caregivers in patient-centered outcomes research on advanced stage lung cancer: insights from patients, caregivers, and providers.

Participatory and patient-centered approaches to cancer research have been highlighted as the most appropriate means of engaging patients in the conduct of clinical research. However, there is a paucity of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) on lung cancer. Previous studies seeking to define lung cancer treatment success have generally not included patients' and caregivers' perceptions and views in treatment decision-making. Additionally, little is known about effective strategies for the engagement of lung cancer patients in PCOR. We sought to gain insights into the perceptions of patients, caregivers, and providers on lung cancer treatment success, as well as on strategies for patient engagement in lung cancer PCOR. Four focus groups were conducted with provider, patient, and caregiver participants from four cancer centers in Nebraska and South Dakota. A total of 36 providers, patients, and caregivers participated in this study. Patients and caregivers confirmed that survival alone should not be the measure of lung cancer treatment success and that definitions of treatment success should emphasize factors such as effective clinical guidance throughout treatment, symptom management, functionality, and quality of life. Clinician participants noted that the definition of treatment success evolved over time and appeared to be linked to patients' experiences with chemotherapy. Participants identified barriers to and facilitators of research participation and suggested strategies for the recruitment and retention of research participants. Our study indicates that patients can successfully play active and engaged roles in clinical research, ranging from participant to partner. Judging from the enthusiasm of our focus group attendees, patients and caregivers want to participate and be engaged in clinical research.