Implementation and effectiveness of a physician-focused peer support program.

BACKGROUND: The practice of medicine faces a mounting burnout crisis. Physician burnout leads to worse mental health outcomes, provider turnover, and decreased quality of care. Peer support, a viable strategy to combat burnout, has been shown to be well received by physicians. METHODS: This study evaluates the Peer Outreach Support Team (POST) program, a physician-focused peer support initiative established in a 2-hospital system, using descriptive statistical methodologies. We evaluate the POST program using the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) framework to describe important contextual factors including characteristics of the intervention, recipients, implementation and sustainability infrastructure, and external environment, and to assess RE-AIM outcomes including reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. RESULTS: This program successfully trained 59 peer supporters across 11 departments in a 2-hospital system over a 3-year period. Trained supporters unanimously felt the training was useful and aided in general departmental culture shift (100% of respondents). After 3 years, 48.5% of physician survey respondents across 5 active departments had had a peer support interaction, with 306 successful interactions recorded. The rate of interactions increased over the 3-year study period, and the program was adopted by 11 departments, representing approximately 60% of all physicians in the 2-hospital system. Important implementation barriers and facilitators were identified. Physician recipients of peer support reported improved well-being, decreased negative emotions and stigma, and perceived positive cultural changes within their departments. CONCLUSIONS: We found that POST, a physician-focused peer support program, had widespread reach and a positive effect on perceived physician well-being and departmental culture. This analysis outlines a viable approach to support physicians and suggests future studies considering direct effectiveness measures and programmatic adaptations. Our findings can inform and guide other healthcare systems striving to establish peer support initiatives to improve physician well-being.

Wound Care Follow-Up From the Emergency Department Using a Mobile Application: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) do not have primary care and risk being lost to follow-up. Technology has been used successfully in surgical populations for wound care follow-up yet this is not well studied in ED populations. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to conduct a pilot study demonstrating "smartphone" application-based follow-up after wound care in the ED. METHODS: We enrolled participants in 2 urban EDs using a smartphone application called Mobile Post-Operative Wound Evaluator (mPOWEr) and defined participation as photographic submission at any time during the study period. We collected demographic data, frequency of use of mPOWEr, number of photographs uploaded, and timing of uploads. RESULTS: We approached patients for study enrollment, and 67 patients (28%) were not enrolled because they had no access to a smartphone. Seventy-one patients (30%) declined to enroll, leaving 100 (42%) successfully enrolled. Smartphone ownership was more common among patients <40 years of age (81% vs. 64%, p = 0.004), more common among white patients than nonwhite patients (75% vs. 15%, p = 0.046), more common among patients approached at the university medical center than the trauma center (84% vs. 66%, p = 0.003), and among patients with commercial or other insurance than those with Medicare or Medicaid (92% vs. 54%, p < 0.001). Of those enrolled, 58% submitted a photograph. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting for wound care to the ED will participate in smartphone-based app communication for wound care follow-up and are satisfied with this option. Disparities in smartphone access must be considered when using this follow-up method.

Initial arterial carbon dioxide tension is associated with neurological outcome after resuscitation from cardiac arrest.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationships between partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2), prescribed minute ventilation (MV), and neurologic outcome in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing a multicenter database of adult patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was neurologic status at hospital discharge, defined by Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score: CPC 1-2 was favorable, CPC 3-5 was poor. We compared rates of initial normocarbia (PaCO2 31-49mmHg) and mean sequential PaCO2 measurements obtained over the first 24h. We also assessed the influence of MV on the PaCO2 at initial, 6, 12, 18, and 24h after cardiac arrest using univariate linear regression. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients from 3 institutions met inclusion criteria. Overall, 46/114 (40.4%, 95% CI: 31.4-49.4%) patients survived to hospital discharge, and 33/114 (28.9%, 20.6-37.2%) had CPC 1-2 at the time of discharge. A total of 38.9% (95% CI: 29.9-47.9%) of patients had initial normocarbia; 43.2% (28.6-57.8%) of these patients were discharged with CPC 1-2, compared with 20.3% (10.8-29.8%) of dyscarbic patients. By 6h, neurologic outcomes were not significantly associated with PaCO2. Prescribed MV was not associated with PaCO2 at any time point with the exception of a weak correlation at hour 18. CONCLUSION: Initial normocarbia was associated with favorable neurological outcome in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. This relationship was not seen at subsequent time points. There was no significant association between prescribed MV and PaCO2 or neurologic outcome.