Salivary immune markers are not associated with self-reported childhood maltreatment or psychopathology in adults.

BACKGROUND: Psychological stress has repeatedly been found to be associated with pro-inflammatory markers in blood, and neuro-inflammation may play a role in the development of psychopathology after early life stress. Salivary immune testing is a novel method to non-invasively assess immune functioning. We examined a large range of salivary immune markers in relation to self-reported childhood maltreatment and psychopathology in an adult sample. METHODS: Participants (N = 118, 51% female, mean age = 46.6 yrs, range 22-64) were drawn from a cross-sectional three-generation study, and supplied 2 ml of saliva via passive drool. They reported on childhood maltreatment experiences and on psychopathological symptoms in the last 6 months. Hair cortisol was additionally assessed in a subsample (n = 68). Levels of IL1ß, IL6, IL8, IFNγ, TNFα, tIgE, sIgA, FLCƛ, and FLCƙ were assessed. RESULTS: Linear mixed model analyses showed that several salivary immune markers were associated with age (sIgA and IgE), BMI (sIgA, IL1ß, and IL6), sex (FLCs and IgE), and bad health (IL6, IL8, TNFα). No associations with (anti-inflammatory) medication use or oral health problems were found. Notably, no associations between the immune markers and self-reported childhood maltreatment, psychopathology, or hair cortisol were found. CONCLUSIONS: Salivary immune measures were found to be sensitive to individual differences in age, sex, health and BMI. However. in the current sample there was no indication of inflammation in relation to chronic psychological stress. Larger studies, including participants with higher stress levels, are needed to further examine associations between salivary immune markers and psychological stress.

The STRESS-NL database: A resource for human acute stress studies across the Netherlands.

Stress initiates a cascade of (neuro)biological, physiological, and behavioral changes, allowing us to respond to a challenging environment. The human response to acute stress can be studied in detail in controlled settings, usually in a laboratory environment. To this end, many studies employ acute stress paradigms to probe stress-related outcomes in healthy and patient populations. Though valuable, these studies in themselves often have relatively limited sample sizes. We established a data-sharing and collaborative interdisciplinary initiative, the STRESS-NL database, which combines (neuro)biological, physiological, and behavioral data across many acute stress studies in order to accelerate our understanding of the human acute stress response in health and disease (www.stressdatabase.eu). Researchers in the stress field from 12 Dutch research groups of 6 Dutch universities created a database to achieve an accurate inventory of (neuro)biological, physiological, and behavioral data from laboratory-based human studies that used acute stress tests. Currently, the STRESS-NL database consists of information on 5529 individual participants (2281 females and 3348 males, age range 6-99 years, mean age 27.7 ±â€¯16 years) stemming from 57 experiments described in 42 independent studies. Studies often did not use the same stress paradigm; outcomes were different and measured at different time points. All studies currently included in the database assessed cortisol levels before, during and after experimental stress, but cortisol measurement will not be a strict requirement for future study inclusion. Here, we report on the creation of the STRESS-NL database and infrastructure to illustrate the potential of accumulating and combining existing data to allow meta-analytical, proof-of-principle analyses. The STRESS-NL database creates a framework that enables human stress research to take new avenues in explorative and hypothesis-driven data analyses with high statistical power. Future steps could be to incorporate new studies beyond the borders of the Netherlands; or build similar databases for experimental stress studies in rodents. In our view, there are major scientific benefits in initiating and maintaining such international efforts.

Augmenting PTSD treatment with physical activity: study protocol of the APPART study (Augmentation for PTSD with Physical Activity in a Randomized Trial).

Background: New intensive trauma-focused treatment (TFT) programmes that incorporate physical activity have been developed for people with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, the unique contribution of physical activity within these intensive TFT programmes has never been investigated in a controlled manner. Objectives: This randomized controlled trial will investigate the effectiveness of physical activity added to an intensive TFT programme. In addition, the study aims to investigate the underlying mechanisms of the effects of physical activity on the change in PTSD symptoms. Methods: Individuals with PTSD (N = 120) will be randomly allocated to two conditions: a physical activity or a non-physical active control condition. All participants will receive the same intensive TFT lasting eight days within two consecutive weeks, in which daily prolonged exposure and EMDR therapy sessions, and psycho-education are combined. The amount of physical activity will differ per condition. While the physical activity condition induces daily physical activities with moderate intensity, in the non-physical active control condition no physical activity is prescribed; but instead, a controlled mixture of guided (creative) tasks is performed. The two primary outcome measures are change in PTSD symptoms from pre- to post-treatment and at six months follow-up, measured with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5), and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Additionally, self-reported sleep problems, depressive symptoms, emotion regulation, dissociation symptoms and anxiety sensitivity will be measured as potential underlying mechanisms. Conclusions: This study will contribute to the research field of augmentation strategies for PTSD treatment by investigating the effectiveness of physical activity added to intensive TFT. Trial registration: This trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (Trial NL9120).

Antecedentes: Se han desarrollado para personas con TEPT nuevos programas de tratamiento intensivos centrados en trauma (TFT por sus siglas en inglés) que incorporan actividad física. Sin embargo, la contribución única de la actividad física dentro de estos programas de TFT intensivos nunca se ha investigado de manera controlada.Objetivos: Este ensayo controlado aleatorizado investigará la efectividad de la actividad física agregada a un programa intensivo de TFT. Además, el estudio tiene como objetivo investigar los mecanismos subyacentes de los efectos de la actividad física sobre el cambio en los síntomas de TEPT.Métodos: Las personas con TEPT serán asignadas en forma aleatoria a dos condiciones: una actividad física o una condición de control activo no físico. Todos los participantes recibirán la misma TFT intensiva que durará 8 días dentro de dos semanas consecutivas, en las que se combinarán diariamente la exposición prolongada y las sesiones de terapia EMDR y psicoeducación. La cantidad de actividad física diferirá según la condición. Mientras que la condición de actividad física induce actividades físicas diarias de moderada intensidad, en la condición de control activo no físico no se prescribe actividad física, sino que se realiza una mezcla controlada de tareas guiadas (creativa). Las dos medidas de resultado primarias son el cambio en los síntomas de TEPT antes y después del tratamiento y a los seis meses de seguimiento, medidos con la Escala de TEPT administrada por el clínico (CAPS-5) y la Lista de verificación de TEPT del DSM-5 (PCL-5). Adicionalmente, los problemas del sueño autoinformados, los síntomas depresivos, la regulación de emociones, los síntomas disociativos y la sensibilidad a la ansiedad se medirán como potenciales mecanismos subyacentes.Conclusiones: Este estudio contribuirá al campo de la investigación de las estrategias de potenciación para el tratamiento del TEPT al investigar la efectividad de la actividad física agregada a la TFT intensiva.Registro de ensayo: este ensayo esta registrado en el Registro de ensayos de los Países Bajos (ensayo NL 9120).

Solitary sleeping in young infants is associated with heightened cortisol reactivity to a bathing session but not to a vaccination.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective longitudinal study, we investigated the relation between sleeping arrangements and infant cortisol reactivity to stressors in the first two post-natal months. Co-sleeping, as compared to solitary sleeping, is hypothesized to provide more parental external stress regulation by night, thus reducing general stress sensitivity. We therefore expected lower cortisol reactivity to stress in infants who co-slept more regularly. METHODS: Participants were 163 mothers and infants from uncomplicated, singleton pregnancies. Mothers completed daily diaries on sleeping arrangements in the first 7 weeks of life. Co-sleeping was defined as sleeping in the parents' bedroom (i.e. own or parents' bed). Cortisol reactivity was measured twice: to a mild physical stressor (bathing session) at 5 weeks of age and to a mild pain stressor (vaccination) at 2 months of age. RESULTS: Infants with a solitary sleeping arrangement in their first month of life showed a heightened cortisol response to the bathing session at 5 weeks compared to infants that co-slept regularly. This effect was not explained by breastfeeding practices, maternal caregiving behavior, or infants' night waking and sleep duration. No effects were found of co-sleeping on the cortisol response to the vaccination at 2 months. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that solitary sleeping in the first month of life is associated with heightened sensitivity of the HPA-axis to a mild stressor, possibly due to less nocturnal parental availability as external stress regulator. Whether this effect continues in later life, remains to be investigated.

Maternal prenatal stress and cortisol reactivity to stressors in human infants.

Early life factors can shape the development of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis. Maternal prenatal stress might constitute such an early environmental factor. As little is known about the relation between maternal prenatal stress and cortisol reactivity in human offspring, we performed a longitudinal study including four assessments of infant cortisol reactivity to stressful events in a non-clinical population. General and pregnancy-related feelings of stress and anxiety, as well as circadian cortisol levels, were measured in 173 mothers in the last trimester of pregnancy. Infant cortisol reactivity was measured at 5 weeks to a bathing session, at 8 weeks to a vaccination, at 5 months to a stressful mother-infant interaction (still face procedure), and at 12 months to a maternal separation (strange situation procedure). Maternal prenatal fear of bearing a handicapped child was a consistent predictor of infant cortisol reactivity. Although the effects were mild, higher fear was significantly related to higher salivary cortisol reactivity to the bathing session and to decreased cortisol reactivity to vaccination and maternal separation. Thus, pregnancy-specific anxieties predict infant cortisol reactivity in the first year of life, but the direction of the effect depends on infant age and/or the nature of the stressor. While this specific anxiety was a better predictor than stress experience or maternal cortisol concentrations, the underlying mechanisms of these associations remain unclear. Future studies should try to incorporate multiple measures of HPA-axis reactivity during development when studying the long-term consequences of maternal prenatal stress.