Design of the formalized and integrated Alzheimer's Disease Ontology and its application in retrieving textual data via text mining.

As one of the leading causes for dementia in the population, it is imperative that we discern exactly why Alzheimer's disease (AD) has a strong molecular association with beta-amyloid and tau. Although a clear understanding about etiology and pathogenesis of AD remains unsolved, scientists worldwide have dedicated significant efforts to discovering the molecular interactions linked to the pathological characteristics and potential treatments. Knowledge representations, such as domain ontologies encompassing our current understanding about AD, could greatly assist and contribute to disease research. This paper describes the construction and application of the integrated Alzheimer's Disease Ontology (ADO), combining selected concepts from the former version of the ADO and the Alzheimer's Disease Mapping Ontology (ADMO). In addition to the existing entities available from these knowledge models, essential knowledge about AD from public sources, such as newly discovered risk factor genes and novel treatments, was also integrated. The ADO can also be leveraged in text mining scenarios given that it is conceptually enriched with domain-specific knowledge as well as their relations. The integrated ADO consists of 39 855 total axioms. The ontology covers many aspects of the AD domain, including risk factor genes, clinical features, treatments and experimental models. The ontology complies with the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology principles and was accepted by the foundry. In this paper, we illustrate the role of the presented ontology in extracting textual information from the SCAIView database and key measures in an ADO-based corpus. Database URL:  https://academic.oup.com/database.

Multi-ontology embeddings approach on human-aligned multi-ontologies representation for gene-disease associations prediction.

Objectives: Knowledge graphs and ontologies in the biomedical domain provide rich contextual knowledge for a variety of challenges. Employing that for knowledge-driven NLP tasks such as gene-disease association prediction represents a promising way to increase the predictive power of a model. Methods: We investigated the power of infusing the embedding of two aligned ontologies as prior knowledge to the NLP models. We evaluated the performance of different models on some large-scale gene-disease association datasets and compared it with a model without incorporating contextualized knowledge (BERT). Results: The experiments demonstrated that the knowledge-infused model slightly outperforms BERT by creating a small number of bridges. Thus, indicating that incorporating cross-references across ontologies can enhance the performance of base models without the need for more complex and costly training. However, further research is needed to explore the generalizability of the model. We expected that adding more bridges would bring further improvement based on the trend we observed in the experiments. In addition, the use of state-of-the-art knowledge graph embedding methods on a joint graph from connecting OGG and DOID with bridges also yielded promising results. Conclusion: Our work shows that allowing language models to leverage structured knowledge from ontologies does come with clear advantages in the performance. Besides, the annotation stage brought out in this paper is constrained in reasonable complexity.

On the influence of several factors on pathway enrichment analysis.

Pathway enrichment analysis has become a widely used knowledge-based approach for the interpretation of biomedical data. Its popularity has led to an explosion of both enrichment methods and pathway databases. While the elegance of pathway enrichment lies in its simplicity, multiple factors can impact the results of such an analysis, which may not be accounted for. Researchers may fail to give influential aspects their due, resorting instead to popular methods and gene set collections, or default settings. Despite ongoing efforts to establish set guidelines, meaningful results are still hampered by a lack of consensus or gold standards around how enrichment analysis should be conducted. Nonetheless, such concerns have prompted a series of benchmark studies specifically focused on evaluating the influence of various factors on pathway enrichment results. In this review, we organize and summarize the findings of these benchmarks to provide a comprehensive overview on the influence of these factors. Our work covers a broad spectrum of factors, spanning from methodological assumptions to those related to prior biological knowledge, such as pathway definitions and database choice. In doing so, we aim to shed light on how these aspects can lead to insignificant, uninteresting or even contradictory results. Finally, we conclude the review by proposing future benchmarks as well as solutions to overcome some of the challenges, which originate from the outlined factors.