Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 3(12): e0002498, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38134001

ABSTRACT

Adolescent bullying victimization is recognized as a public health and mental health problem in many countries. However, data on bullying victimization's prevalence and risk factors is scarce in sub-Saharan Africa Sierra Leone. This research aimed to determine bullying victimization prevalence and its associated factors among Sierra Leonean school-going adolescents. The Sierra Leone 2017 Global School-based Health Survey (GSHS) dataset was analyzed. The outcome variable was the respondent's self-report of bullying victimization ("How many days in the previous 30 days were you bullied?"). Descriptive, Pearson chi-square and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted. The regression analysis yielded adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a significance level of p 0.05. Bullying victimization was prevalent among 48.7% of the in-school adolescents. Adolescents who drank alcohol [aOR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.50-4.10], who reported feelings of loneliness [aOR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.07-2.14] and who had attempted suicide [aOR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.03-2.87] were also more likely to be bullied. Also, school truancy [aOR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.24-1.88] among teenagers was associated with an increased risk of being bullied. Our findings suggest that bullying is a widespread problem among Sierra Leonean school-aged youth, and alcohol drinking, loneliness, suicide attempt and school truancy are potential risk factors. In light of the aforementioned causes of bullying in schools, policymakers and school administrators in Sierra Leone need to develop and execute anti-bullying policies and initiatives that target the underlying risk factors of bullying among teenagers.

2.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22281019

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThere is uncertainty about the mortality impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa because of poor ascertainment of cases and limited national civil vital registration. We analysed excess mortality from 1st January 2020-5th May 2022 in a Health and Demographic Surveillance Study in Coastal Kenya where the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence reached 75% among adults in March 2022 despite vaccine uptake of only 17%. MethodsWe modelled expected mortality in 2020-2022 among a population of 306,000 from baseline surveillance data between 2010-2019. We calculated excess mortality as the ratio of observed/expected deaths in 5 age strata for each month and for each national wave of the pandemic. We estimated cumulative mortality risks as the total number of excess deaths in the pandemic per 100,000 population. We investigated observed deaths using verbal autopsy. FindingWe observed 16,236 deaths among 3,410,800 person years between 1st January 2010 and 5th May 2022. Across 5 waves of COVID-19 cases during 1st April 2020-16th April 2022, population excess mortality was 4.1% (95% PI -0.2%, 7.9%). Mortality was elevated among those aged [≥]65 years at 14.3% (95% PI 7.4%, 21.6%); excess deaths coincided with wave 2 (wild-type), wave 4 (Delta) and wave 5 (Omicron BA1). Among children aged 1-14 years there was negative excess mortality of -20.3% (95% PI -29.8%, -8.1%). Verbal autopsy data showed a transient reduction in deaths from acute respiratory infections in 2020 at all ages. For comparison with other studies, cumulative excess mortality risk for January 2020-December 2021, age-standardized to the Kenyan population, was 47.5/100,000. InterpretationNet excess mortality during the pandemic was substantially lower in Coastal Kenya than in many high income countries. However, adults, aged [≥]65 years, experienced substantial excess mortality suggesting that targeted COVID-19 vaccination of older persons may limit further COVID-19 deaths by protecting the residual pool of naive individuals. FundingWellcome Trust

3.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22273516

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThe impact of COVID-19 on all-cause mortality in sub-Saharan Africa remains unknown. MethodsWe monitored mortality among 306,000 residents of Kilifi Health and Demographic Surveillance System, Kenya, through four COVID-19 waves from April 2020-September 2021. We calculated expected deaths using negative binomial regression fitted to baseline mortality data (2010-2019) and calculated excess mortality as observed-minus-expected deaths. We excluded deaths in infancy because of under-ascertainment of births during lockdown. In February 2021, after two waves of wild-type COVID-19, adult seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 was 25.1%. We predicted COVID-19-attributable deaths as the product of age-specific seroprevalence, population size and global infection fatality ratios (IFR). We examined changes in cause of death by Verbal Autopsy (VA). ResultsBetween April 2020 and February 2021, we observed 1,000 deaths against 1,012 expected deaths (excess mortality -1.2%, 95% PI -6.6%, 5.8%). Based on SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence, we predicted 306 COVID-19-attributable deaths (a predicted excess mortality of 30.6%) within this period. Monthly mortality analyses showed a significant excess among adults aged [≥]45 years in only two months, July-August 2021, coinciding with the fourth (Delta) wave of COVID-19. By September 2021, overall excess mortality was 3.2% (95% PI -0.6%, 8.1%) and cumulative excess mortality risk was 18.7/100,000. By VA, there was a transient reduction in deaths attributable to acute respiratory infections in 2020. ConclusionsNormal mortality rates during extensive transmission of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 through February 2021 suggests that the IFR for this variant is lower in Kenya than elsewhere. We found excess mortality associated with the Delta variant but the cumulative excess mortality risk remains low in coastal Kenya compared to global estimates.

4.
Afr. j. reprod. health ; 26(6): 1-7, 2022. tables
Article in English | AIM (Africa) | ID: biblio-1382113

ABSTRACT

Informed decisions about one's sexual and reproductive health can be made through family planning. Women of reproductive age in rural Sierra Leone's Western area were asked to participate in a survey to determine their attitudes and knowledge toward family planning and the use of contraceptives. A descriptive cross-sectional study survey was conducted in the Western Area Rural of Sierra Leone. Females in the range of 15 to 49 years old were included in the study. The research was conducted from November 2021 to December 2021. Using a pre-designed and pretested questionnaire, 180 women were assessed for their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding family planning. According to the study, all participants knew about family planning, but only 68.3% had used contraceptives. There were more than half who learned about it from the media. The study found that 95% of participants had a positive attitude towards contraceptives. Most commonly, contraceptives used were oral pills (31.6), injections (21.1%), implants (19.1%), lactational amenorrhea (13.8%), condoms (8.8%), and intrauterine devices (5%). In our study, the most common reasons given by participants for not using contraceptives were; not willing to disclose 52.6%, a desire for a child 19.2%, fear of side effects 15.7%, currently pregnant 8.7%, and against religious beliefs 3.5%. The study shows that even if people are aware and educated about contraceptives, they may not use them. Educating and motivating people and improving access to family planning services are still necessary to improve the effectiveness and appropriateness of contraceptive use and halt the population growth trend. (Afr J Reprod Health 2022; 26 [6]:15-21).


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Contraceptive Agents, Female , Family Practice , Attitude , Knowledge , Family Planning Services , Hospitals
5.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21262114

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVESThe aim of this analysis was to quantify the relative risk of childhood deaths across the whole of England during the first year of the COVID pandemic, compared to a similar period of 2019. DESIGNThis work is based on data collected by the National Child Mortality Database (NCMD) which collates data on all children who die in England. The number of deaths, and their characteristics, from 1st April 2020 until 31st of March 2021 (2020-21), were compared to those from the same period of 2019-20. Relative risk and excess mortality were derived for deaths in 2020-21 vs 2019-20. SETTINGAll deaths reported to NCMD in England of children under 18 years of age, between April 2019 and March 2021. PARTICIPANTS6490 deaths of children, under the age of 18 years, reported to the NCMD over the study period. RESULTSChildren who died between April 2020 and March 2021 had similar demographics to those who died in 2019-20. Overall, there were 356 (198 to 514) fewer deaths in 2020-21 than in 2019-20 (RR 0.90 (0.85-0.94), p<0.001). Repeating the analysis by category of death, suggested that deaths from infection (RR 0.49 (0.38-0.64)) and from other underlying medical conditions (RR 0.75 (0.68-0.82)) were lower in 2020-21 than 2019-20, and weak evidence (p=0.074) that this was also true of deaths from substance abuse. CONCLUSIONSChildhood mortality in England during the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was the lowest on record, with over 300 fewer deaths than the preceding 12 months. The greatest reduction was seen in children less than 10 years old. It is important that we learn from this effect, that potentially offers alternative ways to improve the outcome for the most vulnerable children in our society.

6.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21260366

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThere is concern about the impact of COVID-19, and the control measures to prevent the spread, on childrens mental health. The aim of this work was to identify if there had been a rise of childhood suicide during the COVID pandemic; using data from Englands National Child Mortality Database (NCMD). MethodChild suicide rates between April to December 2020 were compared with those in 2019 using negative binomial regression models, and characteristics compared. In a subset (1st January to 17th May 2020) further characteristics and possible contributing factors were obtained. ResultsA total of 193 likely childhood deaths by suicide were reported. There was no evidence overall suicide deaths were higher in 2020 than 2019 (RR 1.09 (0.80-1.48), p=0.584) but weak evidence that the rate in the first lockdown period (April to May 2020) was higher than the corresponding period in 2019 (RR 1.56 (0.86-2.81), p=0.144). Characteristics of individuals were similar between periods. Restriction to education and other activities, disruption to care and support services, tensions at home and isolation appeared to be contributing factors. LimitationsAs child suicides are fortunately rare, the analysis is based on small numbers of deaths with limited statistical power to detect anything but major increases in incidence. ConclusionWe found no consistent evidence that child suicide deaths increased during the COVID-19 pandemic although there was a concerning signal they may have increased during the first UK lockdown. A similar peak was not seen during the following months, or the second lockdown.

7.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20219097

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo describe the incidence and nature of co-infection in critically ill adults with COVID-19 infection in England. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of adults with COVID-19 admitted to seven intensive care units (ICUs) in England up to 18 May 2020, was performed. Patients with completed ICU stays were included. The proportion and type of organisms were determined at <48 and >48 hours following hospital admission, corresponding to community and hospital-acquired co-infections. ResultsOf 254 patients studied (median age 59 years (IQR 49-69); 64.6% male), 139 clinically significant organisms were identified from 83(32.7%) patients. Bacterial co-infections were identified within 48 hours of admission in 14(5.5%) patients; the commonest pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (four patients) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (two patients). The proportion of pathogens detected increased with duration of ICU stay, consisting largely of Gram-negative bacteria, particularly Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. The co-infection rate >48 hours after admission was 27/1000 person-days (95% CI 21.3-34.1). Patients with co-infections were more likely to die in ICU (crude OR 1.78,95% CI 1.03-3.08, p=0.04) compared to those without co-infections. ConclusionWe found limited evidence for community-acquired bacterial co-infection in hospitalised adults with COVID-19, but a high rate of Gram-negative infection acquired during ICU stay.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...