Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 51(4): 251-253, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301625

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States, including chlamydia and gonorrhea, are rising. Point-of-care (POC) testing could increase access to testing and treatment. This evaluation found POC STI testing to be concordant with the results of traditional laboratory testing for 100% of patients who were tested. Ninety-five percent of the patients reported being satisfied with the experience, and 66% preferred it to traditional laboratory testing. The most commonly reported reason for preferring the test was the short amount of time it took to receive results. However, insurance reimbursed less than 30% of what was billed for the POC tests. Low insurance reimbursement rates could be a barrier to implementation long-term financial sustainability of POC STI testing.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections , Chlamydia , Gonorrhea , HIV Infections , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Humans , United States , Point-of-Care Systems , Point-of-Care Testing
2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 51(3): 162-170, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412463

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People experiencing incarceration are disproportionately impacted by HIV and are potential candidates for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We explored factors associated with PrEP interest and PrEP uptake and described barriers to PrEP uptake among incarcerated men in a state correctional system. METHODS: From September 2019 to July 2022, incarcerated men at the Rhode Island Department of Corrections were screened for PrEP eligibility and referred to a PrEP initiation study. We used bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression models to explore factors associated with PrEP interest and uptake in the screening sample. RESULTS: Of the men screened and determined to be eligible for PrEP, approximately half (50%) were interested in taking PrEP. Individuals identifying as men who have sex with men (adjusted odds ratio, 4.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-11.4) and having multiple female sex partners (adjusted odds ratio, 2.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-6.27) were more likely to express interest in PrEP (interested/not interested) than those not reporting these behavioral factors. Preexposure prophylaxis uptake (yes/no) was 38%. Lack of PrEP interest, low self-perceived risk of HIV acquisition, and unpredictable lengths of incarceration were the most frequently encountered barriers to PrEP uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Men reporting sexual transmission behaviors were more interested in PrEP and had higher uptake than other men. Preexposure prophylaxis interest and HIV risk factors were both moderately high, which suggests that men experiencing incarceration should be screened for and offered PrEP as part of standard clinical care. Study findings have important implications for research and practice to adapt PrEP care to correctional systems.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Male , Humans , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Homosexuality, Male , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Sexual Behavior
3.
Public Health Rep ; 139(2): 174-179, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37476929

ABSTRACT

HIV disproportionately affects populations experiencing incarceration. Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective approach to preventing HIV acquisition among populations at increased risk of acquiring HIV. Yet few, if any, efforts have been made to offer PrEP in correctional settings. Beginning in November 2019, the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC) implemented a systemwide PrEP initiation program with linkage to PrEP care in the community upon reentry. Incarcerated individuals identified as being potentially at increased risk of HIV acquisition during standard clinical screenings and medical care were referred to a PrEP care provider for potential PrEP initiation. Of the 309 people who met with a PrEP care provider, 35% (n = 109; 88 men, 21 women) agreed to initiate PrEP while incarcerated. Clinical testing and evaluation were completed for 82% (n = 89; 69 men, 20 women) of those who agreed to initiate PrEP. Of those, 54% (n = 48; 29 men, 19 women) completed the necessary clinical evaluation to initiate PrEP, were determined to be appropriate candidates for PrEP use, and had the medication delivered to a RIDOC facility for initiation. Only 8 people (4 men, 4 women) were successfully linked to a PrEP care provider in the community after release. The RIDOC experience demonstrates notable levels of PrEP interest and moderate levels of PrEP uptake among this population. However, PrEP engagement in care after release and persistence in taking PrEP when in the community were relatively poor, indicating a need to better understand approaches to overcoming barriers to PrEP care in this unique setting.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Prisoners , Humans , Male , United States , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Rhode Island , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Homosexuality, Male
4.
AIDS Behav ; 27(8): 2513-2522, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36633764

ABSTRACT

Men who have sex with men (MSM) with a history of incarceration experience unique risk factors for HIV acquisition. The current study examined unique risk factors for HIV among MSM with a history of incarceration presenting to a sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinic. We analyzed self-reported behavioral data from clinical encounters among patients attending the clinic between January 2012 and April 2021. There were 17,221 unique visits, of which 5988 were MSM. Of these, 4.34% (N = 206) were MSM with a history of incarceration. MSM with a history of incarceration were significantly more likely to report a range of behavioral risk factors for HIV, yet also were significantly less likely to perceive themselves at risk for HIV. Future research and practice should develop culturally tailored biobehavioral HIV prevention services and consider embedding these programs within criminal justice settings to better reach this at-risk group.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Male , Humans , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Homosexuality, Male , Syndemic , Sexual Behavior
5.
Int J STD AIDS ; 34(5): 315-321, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36655673

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is the most effective biomedical intervention for HPV infections. HPV vaccination rate among sexually active young adults is largely unknown. METHODS: Patients aged 18-26 years, who attended the Rhode Island Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic between 2013-2018, were included in the study. We extracted demographics, behavioral characteristics, and HPV vaccination status from electronic medical records. Exploratory logistic regressions were conducted to identify factors associated with vaccination status. RESULTS: Among 2729 eligible individuals, the median age was 23 years (interquartile range: 22-25). Only 8.1% of males and 24.8% of females received at least one dose of HPV vaccine. Females were 144% (crude odds ratio [cOR]: 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.03, 2.94) more likely to receive at least one dose of HPV vaccine than males. Being Black/African American (B/AA) or Hispanic/Latino (H/L) was associated with a 21% (cOR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.00) and 34% (cOR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.81) decrease in the odds of vaccination, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HPV vaccination rate was low among sexually active young adults. Gender and racial/ethnic disparities existed in HPV vaccination. Interventions are needed to promote HPV vaccination among sexually active young adults, especially B/AA and H/L communities.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Male , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Vaccination Coverage , Vaccination
6.
PLoS One ; 17(6): e0268587, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35648751

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccines are effective in preventing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Vaccine hesitancy defined as delay of acceptance or refusal of the vaccine is a major barrier to effective implementation. METHODS: Participants were recruited statewide through an English and Spanish social media marketing campaign conducted by a local news station during a one-month period as vaccines were becoming available in Rhode Island (from December 21, 2020 to January 22, 2021). Participants completed an online survey about COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy with constructs and items adopted from the Health Belief Model. RESULTS: A total of 2,007 individuals completed the survey. Eight percent (n = 161) reported vaccine hesitancy. The sample had a median age of 58 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 45, 67), were majority female (78%), White (96%), Non-Hispanic (94%), employed (58%), and reported an annual individual income of $50,000 (59%). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was associated with attitudes and behaviors related to COVID-19. A one unit increase in concern about COVID-19 was associated with a 69% (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.26-0.37) decrease in vaccine hesitancy. A one-level increase in the likelihood of getting influenza vaccine was associated with a 55% (AOR: 0.45 95% CI: 0.41-0.50) decrease in vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was relatively low in a state-wide survey in Rhode Island. Future research is needed to better understand and tailor messaging related to vaccine hesitancy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , Urogenital Abnormalities , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Rhode Island/epidemiology , Vaccination Hesitancy
7.
AIDS Behav ; 25(11): 3754-3757, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34114166

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is a public health crisis that has fundamentally altered health care provision. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of COVID-19 on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care. We reviewed all patient records for those who presented for PrEP care at a PrEP program in Providence, Rhode Island from September 1st, 2019 to May 29th, 2020. The number of PrEP encounters decreased but was not significantly different over time (ps > .05). Patients were still able to access PrEP clinical services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Implementing flexible and timely PrEP delivery approaches in this setting likely minimized the disruption of PrEP care during COVID-19.


RESUMEN: COVID-19 es una crisis de salud pública que ha alterado fundamentalmente la prestación de servicios de salud. El propósito de este estudio fue examinar el impacto de COVID-19 en los servicios de la profilaxis preexposición (PrEP). Revisamos todos los registros de pacientes que se presentaron para recibir atención de PrEP en un programa de PrEP en Providence, Rhode Island desde el 1 de septiembre de 2019 hasta el 29 de mayo de 2020. El número de encuentros de PrEP disminuyó pero no fue significativamente diferente con el paso del tiempo (ps > .05). Los pacientes aún pudieron acceder a los servicios clínicos de PrEP durante la pandemia de COVID-19. La implementación de enfoques de entrega de PrEP que eran flexibles y oportunos en este entorno probablemente minimizó la interrupción de la atención médica de la PrEP durante COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , COVID-19 , HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
8.
R I Med J (2013) ; 104(5): 20-23, 2021 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34044432

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its associated disease (COVID-19) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality across the United States. Internal medicine (IM) residents are a critical component of the healthcare workforce yet their seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is largely unknown. The aim of this research was to ascertain the seroprevalences of SARS-CoV-2 among internal medicine residents during the first peak of COVID-19. METHODS: IM residents were enrolled in a surveillance program that included PCR and antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2 in June 2020. Residents also completed a short questionnaire to obtain sociodemographic information and characterize potential workplace exposure to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 101 IM residents participated in the study (out of N=162). Of the 101 samples, three (2.9%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. No residents tested PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2. DISCUSSION: The implementation of COVID-19 patient cohorting and the incorporation of telemedicine to communicate with hospitalized patients into clinical practice early in the pandemic may have prevented the spread of the virus among the surveyed clinical trainees. CONCLUSION: Despite significant engagement with COVID-19 patients, IM residents demonstrated a low rate of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Testing , Female , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional , Male , Occupational Exposure , Prevalence , Rhode Island/epidemiology , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Seroepidemiologic Studies
9.
Sex Transm Dis ; 48(1): e5-e7, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33181578

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 is responsible for a global pandemic and has impacted health care accessibility and delivery. Clinic data were reviewed for an STI clinic from September 2019 to May 2020. A significant decrease in rates of STI visits and treatments during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was observed.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Rhode Island , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...